Kaaya was a good quarterback. He could make some great throws and was tougher than ****. His biggest issue was pocket awareness. People think you need to be fast to avoid getting sacked but that’s not the case at all. You have to have a feel for pressure and make adjustments. That was the weakest part of Kaaya’s game. People say he left because of Richt’s RPO system but ironically he played his best ball the second half of 2016 when Richt dumped the pro style garbage and just decided to let Kaaya sling it from the shotgun since our running game wasn’t exactly carrying the load. People put way too much emphasis on a quarterback’s ability to win games. A great quarterback on a bad team isn’t going to win a ton of games. Just like a mediocre quarterback on a great team will win a lot of games.
He wasn't great, but he was pretty **** good. A great QB can take over a game and find a way to win even when the D and ST's aren't doing the offense any favors. That wasn't Kaaya, but he wasn't THE reason we lost every game while he was here.
Kaaya was 1 dude out of 85. He throws an INT in the redzone and mother ****ers never forget. But for every bad pass there are dozens of missed blocks, dropped passes, bad routes, missed cuts/holes, blitzes that don't get picked up, missed FG's, muffed punts, missed tackles, blown coverages, penalties, coaching mistakes, the list goes on and they all have critical impacts on the outcome of a game. There are three phases to the game and the QB is only on the field for one of them.
Here's a hot take for you: we don't need last minute, miracle catches by Langham to beat GT and FSU, and we beat Pitt if Kaaya is QB in 2017 instead of Rosier. That's not a knock on Rosier, I appreciate everything he did for us, but Kaaya doesn't get benched for Evan Shirreffs in a game that probably gets us into the CFP.