I’m ok with you disagreeing.
But word around the program is that Richt told Rosier he would never play for him. Instead of pouting and going away, he stayed and earned his spot. Irvin, Jr. was in the doghouse. Stayed, earned his spot. And played when Herdon was hurt.
Linder ran for the hills when he lost his spot. Odogwu, too.
Some guys stick it out, others search for an easy exit. Yearby thought going pro early was an easier path than staying another year. No other explanation makes any sense ... Even using your logic of staying being his 3rd best option. Even if it wasn’t.
On Walton ... Read my post with some nuance. I didn’t say he will ONlY be drafted for special teams. I’m saying his ability to b a special teams ace will be the reason he can run a 4.7 and still get drafted. The tape says he makes tackles. The tape says he makes blocks and gets off blocks. NFL teams need those guys. It’s why New England drafted a guy who played more rugby than football at Ohio State.
You’re already on record suggesting there is no difference between Walton and Yearby as a running back. ****, you don’t even think Walton is the faster back. You’d think you’d actually agree with me, to give yourself an out when Walton gets drafted after running a 4.65 at the combine. Lol
If Walton runs a 4.65, where do you think he gets drafted? What round? What do you expect Walton to run, and where do you expect him to get drafted?
I'm on record as saying I personally prefer Yearby to Walton, but I think they're very similar talents levels. I have no problem if you think Walton is better, but there's very little separation between the 2 either way. Both are solid college RB's, but neither are NFL RB's. Mainly because neither have the size or athleticism.
If Yearby runs a 4.73 and Walton runs a 4.65, the takeaway shouldn't be Walton is faster. The takeaway should be they're both really slow. Yearby and Walton both didn't test well athletically coming out of HS. They were similar, but Yearby tested better (I can post the stats if you don't believe me).
Your example of Nate Ebner proves my point. Ebner ran a 4.53, had a 39" vertical, broad jumped 10-8, and had a 6.59 3 cone drill. He was a SICK athlete. You can turn a great athlete into a great special teams player. You can't turn Walton into a great athlete. There s a reason why Homer has 8 solo ST tackles to Walton's 4, and it's because he's another level athletically.
If Walton returns kicks and is awful at it, like he was, that doesn't help his draft stock for just doing it. Same with ST coverage. 1 big hit vs. WVU doesn't make him a special teams "ace".
As for Yearby not wanting to stick it out, I'm sure he felt he outplaying Walton when he got demoted to 3rd string, which is a valid argument (I've got stats for that too if you don't believe me).
I'm sure Yearby was salty he was behind Walton, felt he couldn't earn more PT no matter what, and that rubbed Richt wrong. Richt didn't care because he had enough RB's on the roster and coming in (so he thought at the time). He wasn't running away or taking the easy route - he wasn't getting a fair shake. Walton is Richt's dude, and Richt was sticking with Walton no matter what. That was made clear both last year and this year.