MiamiChris
Freshman
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
- Messages
- 5,368
Please please please someone have the exchange between Marco Wilson and Duwan (spell?) Black
update found it
update found it
Last edited:
Please please please someone have the exchange between Marco Wilson and Duwan (spell?) Black
update found it
View attachment 150537
I could be wrong but it was sent after Marco jokes about his shoe throwing. Black made that comment and I guess they aren’t boysback story?
he's a 4th rounder, should make the 53...not sure about starting...who does AZ have as corners?Lol marco gotta actually make the 53 and become a STARTER to be able to have a MNF intro
The moment OU and Texas become members, UF instantly becomes the 8th best recruiting program in the SEC.
That's not opinion.
![]()
Adding Oklahoma and Texas will boost the SEC’s profile, but prepare for the competitive consequences: Emerson
The SEC would bolster its marquee conference label by adding two bluebloods, but it would come at the expense of some current members.theathletic.com
This is why I think you might see this get blocked. The commissioner is really gonna have to sell this to all current schools on why this will benefit them
I have to imagine OU and Texas have been assured it will get passed for them to go public
I would think that as well but someone said there was some talks about them joining ACC or even Pac at one point as well.
Arkansas A&M and Mizzou are gonna vote no.
There’s a few reasons it might get blocked but I don’t feel like wading through the expansion thread sewer. One major reason is the middle of the road SEC teams that get to reap the benefits of the ESPN tv deal might not be that stoked about their TV appearances getting bumped down from ABC/ESPN to ESPNU/SEC network. If Texas and OU join, that’s the last you’ll see of USCe, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri and others on any of the major networks.This is why I think you might see this get blocked. The commissioner is really gonna have to sell this to all current schools on why this will benefit them
At the end of the Day Money Talk, and BS walks. If they offer a bit more money do you think these lower SEC teams care about not playing on ABC/ESPN for recurring purposes maybe yes but other than that I would say they vote Yes. But I can see Old Miss or whipping boy Miss St. saying NO.There’s a few reasons it might get blocked but I don’t feel like wading through the expansion thread sewer. One major reason is the middle of the road SEC teams that get to reap the benefits of the ESPN tv deal might not be that stoked about their TV appearances getting bumped down from ABC/ESPN to ESPNU/SEC network. If Texas and OU join, that’s the last you’ll see of USCe, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri and others on any of the major networks.
I think Texas used the Pac-12 talk as leverage in their contract with Big 12. But it would be quite interesting to see it get blocked after all this
The billions upon billions of dollars won’t make it a very tough sell… to the administrations at least. The football departments at a&m and fla might raise ****, but a spoon full of Benjamins makes the medicine go down.This is why I think you might see this get blocked. The commissioner is really gonna have to sell this to all current schools on why this will benefit them
We’ve seen 2 SEC teams in a 4 team playoff. If it goes to 12 team playoff with this conference expansion I think the minimum # will be 4 SEC teams in the playoff.I actually hope it does. I dont think its good for CFB. We know preseason polls already put like 10 SEC teams in the top 25 even though some don't deserve to be ranked. This is how they skew the rankings to their favor. Add in those 2 schools and youll easily see 2-3 SEC teams every playoff.