1-12 in bowl games is nothing to just blow off. It represents our horrendous play down the stretch for a long time now.amazing that people care so much about meaningless bowl games
Is what teams who don't win bowl games say. They're not championships or runner-ups like we want/ expect but let's be honest. If we were 12-1 in our bowl games instead of what we are, 1-12 we would be saying the exact opposite.amazing that people care so much about meaningless bowl games
I agree with what you are saying in principle, but bowl games are truly pointless now with the playoff, opt-outs, and the portal.Is what teams who don't win bowl games say. They're not championships or runner-ups like we want/ expect but let's be honest. If we were 12-1 in our bowl games instead of what we are, 1-12 we would be saying the exact opposite.
I agree as well but it’s like a fighter with a 1-12 record and their excuse is they’re not really trying because the opponents aren’t tough enough.I agree with what you are saying in principle, but bowl games are truly pointless now with the playoff, opt-outs, and the portal.
amazing that people care so much about meaningless bowl games
Yeah, I was one who thought it was at least somewhat important to win the Pop Tarts Bowl last year when that debate was going on here. Just the optics of the 11th win and ending the season with some momentum after just missing the playoff seemed important. In the end it may not have made any practical difference, and the second half was basically a B team scrimmage on our side, but winning always beats the alternative.I agree as well but it’s like a fighter with a 1-12 record and their excuse is they’re not really trying because the opponents aren’t tough enough.
If the opponents aren’t tough enough, why are you 1-12? Because the opponents aren’t tough enough and the stage isn’t big enough. Well wouldn’t that mean you would have a better record? No because it doesn’t matter…
So I get it because it doesn’t mean anything but beating Georgia Tech, UNC, BC regularly doesn’t mean anything either and we don’t beat them regularly. So at what point does it matter and at what point are we able to say this program has underperformed full-stop without caveats or conditions because it’s true?
There are plenty of more meaningful stats to show that. How we did in the Sun Bowl or Russell Athletic Bowl is not. With player opt outs, etc…1-12 in bowl games is nothing to just blow off. It represents our horrendous play down the stretch for a long time now.
ThisIs what teams who don't win bowl games say. They're not championships or runner-ups like we want/ expect but let's be honest. If we were 12-1 in our bowl games instead of what we are, 1-12 we would be saying the exact opposite.
Maybe - but mentioning 1-12 in bowl games is the easiest stat to point out.There are plenty of more meaningful stats to show that. How we did in the Sun Bowl or Russell Athletic Bowl is not. With player opt outs, etc…
Maybe - but mentioning 1-12 in bowl games is the easiest stat to point out.
People can spin it all they want but that record is trash. We should NEVER get shut out by Louisiana Tech and IDGAF what bowl we're playing in or how many players opt out
If we were 12-1, the same people would be using that stat to help get an erection.
My whole issue with this “debate” has been the inability to use words other than meaninglessYeah, I was one who thought it was at least somewhat important to win the Pop Tarts Bowl last year when that debate was going on here. Just the optics of the 11th win and ending the season with some momentum after just missing the playoff seemed important. In the end it may not have made any practical difference, and the second half was basically a B team scrimmage on our side, but winning always beats the alternative.
Does anyone have any doubt at all that we'd have won the bowl game had Ward stayed in?
My whole issue with this “debate” has been the inability to use words other than meaningless
Not saying you but it’s just a dumb hyperbolic nonsense word
Is the pop tarts bowl a big deal? No. Is it life or death? No.
Does it ******* matter in some way to a team that has 1 bowl win since many fans have been alive? Yes. Yes it does. And it matters to many players that play in the game and the coaches
So when dorks get on a message board and say it’s meaningless from their couches it’s just laughable really
I’ve explainedI loved paying intramural football in college too, but it didn't mean anything.
Ok you should've left it alone and not gone with your "lazy" remark because now I'm gonna really embarrass you with some grown *** man research since a simple "lazy" bowl stat didn't satisfy you.It's a stat for morons is what it is. "Easiest stat to point out". More like laziest stat to point out.
13 ****** bowl games, not one of which was in January. OK, the 2017 Orange Bowl was a good bowl, so let's make it 12 ****** bowl games.
Randy Shannon (2)
Jeff Stoutland
Al Golden (2)
Larry Scott
Mark Richt (3)
Manny Diaz (2)
So that total includes THREE fired head coaches (Miami has only fired four head coaches in the entire history of our football program) and two interim coaches. Unfortunately, Mark Richt only went 1-2, everyone else lost all their games. Maybe we should bring back Larry Coker, who went 4-2 in bowl games. You know, if we just want some easy/lazy stats to point out.
Why don't we just state the truth and stop living in the past? We have hired some bad coaches. Which, of course, has no bearing or control on whether we can win bowl games in the future.
What a worthless stat. "1-12 in bowl games". We truly have some lazy non-fans.