forums

Ed Reed

Advertisement
M3N said:
People really just can’t admit we have some coaches who are subpar at coaching and/or recruiting.
Click to expand...

oh I can admit it

diaz is a major question at this point

patke.. that's a good joke, good one richt

banda.. lol

rumph.. **** poor recruiter, like good lord i'd take kul's recruiting over him.. yah

searls.. our o line got pushed around by toledo and at times BCC

in fact the entire showing at pittsburg just makes me question a LOT.

the fact that richt had the team sing kumbaya or however it's spelled.. is alarming
 
brock said:
Miami was 1 game away from where Georgia was. They were the luckiest team all year think about it they simply just did not have any significant injuries outside of eason(who fromm turned out to be an upgrade over)
Click to expand...

Brock, nobody gives a crap besides those trying to defend this team, coach, and its season. They made it, we didn't, injuries are part of the game (are there asterisks given or taken away based on injuries or health I'm unaware of somewhere?), luck isn't real and it's just another excuse, etc. We finished how we finished, records matter more. Excuses are for losers. We've been on the winning side of injuries in games and on the losing side. They happen, move on from that bs.
 
SayWhat said:
Brock, nobody gives a crap besides those trying to defend this team, coach, and its season. They made it, we didn't, injuries are part of the game (are there asterisks given or taken away based on injuries or health I'm unaware of somewhere?), luck isn't real and it's just another excuse, etc. We finished how we finished, records matter more. Excuses are for losers. We've been on the winning side of injuries in games and on the losing side. They happen, move on from that bs.
Click to expand...
their season would have been a lot different if mecole hardeman went down, another offensive weapon, as well as a starting rb. Oh and let’s not forget the clear advantage they had over Miami at qb. Hard to overcome all of that period on the offensive side of things. Yes we ****ed the end of the season a way but sh*t did happen period. Miss me with the uga was so much better than Miami last year
 
Last edited:
SayWhat said:
Brock, nobody gives a crap besides those trying to defend this team, coach, and its season. They made it, we didn't, injuries are part of the game (are there asterisks given or taken away based on injuries or health I'm unaware of somewhere?), luck isn't real and it's just another excuse, etc. We finished how we finished, records matter more. Excuses are for losers. We've been on the winning side of injuries in games and on the losing side. They happen, move on from that bs.
Click to expand...

Nah we **** the bed against Pitt.

We smack Pitt, we probably be the #1 or #2 team in CFP heading into the ACC championship. Win or Lose, we would have been in the CFP regardless and probably playing UGA or Alabama in the Rose Bowl.
 
Advertisement
brock said:
there season would have been a lot different if mecole hardeman went down, another offensive weapon, as well as a starting rb. Oh and let’s not forget the clear advantage they had over Miami at qb. Hard to overcome all of that period on the offensive side of things. Yes we ****ed the end of the season a way but sh*t did happen period. Miss me with the uga was so much better than Miami last year
Click to expand...

Let's try this again, real simple like.

Your "if's" don't work. They didn't happen.

Who cares at what you see as an advantage, that's what happens in games and ultimately decides wins and losses. FSU could say we had that kicker, they had this kicker, now what? We had Sean Taylor, now what?

By the way, we could've had all our offensive firepower back, it wouldn't have had us beating Clemson that game. Now what?

Quit being stupid.
 
SayWhat said:
Let's try this again, real simple like.

Your "if's" don't work. They didn't happen.

Who cares at what you see as an advantage, that's what happens in games and ultimately decides wins and losses. FSU could say we had that kicker, they had this kicker, now what? We had Sean Taylor, now what?

By the way, we could've had all our offensive firepower back, it wouldn't have had us beating Clemson that game. Now what?

Quit being stupid.
Click to expand...
Quit swinging on Kirby smart and uga d*ck,
 
M3N said:
We have the money don’t be fooled. And with the ACC network deal coming in next year. We will definitely have the funds.

But at the same token as a HC you have to work with what you got. If MIAMI doesn’t have A decent pool of cash for assistants (hypothetical) then we need to find up an coming guys with a a little bit of a track record.

Ok. St HC Gundy hires dudes that people never heard about.

Pruitt was a HS seconday coach like 6 years ago.
Click to expand...

That's completely ******* false lol. Pruitt was the defensive backs coach for Alabama after their 2009 season LOL. He was hired by Alabama in 2007 to be the director of player development under Saban. Do some research before you post **** like this because the simpletons here are dumb enough to take this as fact. Learn how to use Google, it's your friend.
 
Advertisement
GuptaKnows said:
That's completely ******* false lol. Pruitt was the defensive backs coach for Alabama after their 2009 season LOL. He was hired by Alabama in 2007 to be the director of player development under Saban. Do some research before you post **** like this because the simpletons here are dumb enough to take this as fact. Learn how to use Google, it's your friend.
Click to expand...

I was a couple years off. Relax **** face
 
SayWhat said:
Let's try this again, real simple like.

Your "if's" don't work. They didn't happen.

Who cares at what you see as an advantage, that's what happens in games and ultimately decides wins and losses. FSU could say we had that kicker, they had this kicker, now what? We had Sean Taylor, now what?

By the way, we could've had all our offensive firepower back, it wouldn't have had us beating Clemson that game. Now what?

Quit being stupid.
Click to expand...
His point is ur right ifs dont mean ****. Uga was not that much better than us. His only problem is hes trying to rationalize with yall. It doesnt take a genius to realize uga had an elite running game... they also had a qb who could make plays at times... thats simply stating facts. Injuries or not thats what seperated us from them.
 
Brooklyndee said:
This narrative is redundant & flawed. Heres the problem. #1 a coach is brought here first and foremost for his ability to coach up whatever kids are in his position group. So while we all may find chinks in the armor for our db coaches the only one widely considered over his head is banda. Hes learning. Hes great with the kids,they all love him,hes very motivational but far as coaching up his position and putting kids into a position to succeed he needs and GETS quite a bit of assistance. #2 the bigger flaw in this recruiting arguement for any position coach whether its negative or positive doesnt hold water. All a area/lead recruiter is really asked to do is develop a relationship with a kid and get him on campus as often as possible. He shares in that duty with matt Daugherty and Jorge. Once hes on campus hes "handed off" to cmr or baez or Daugherty in some grouping. Those are the people really responsible for selling a recruit and his family. So anotherwords successful or a failure its a team effort to get a recruit in place. Unless its one of those rare kids who just jumps to commit once he gets an offer.
Click to expand...

this is exactly how it works.

the notion that "one guy" determines who commits and who doesn't, is completely false.

the other thing about banda, is yes, he gets a lot of help in how coaches up these kids. But he has a ton of potential and has certain coaching qualities that you can't teach. it's why he's there. to think otherwise is to say: " many diaz and mark richt don't know what they are doing"

and another thing: your talent as a player has ZERO to do with your talent as a coach. the examples of this throughout history are too numerous to mention, but if talent as a player meant you could automatically be a great coach, then michael Jordan wouldn't have sucked mooseco*k when he tried to coach an NBA team.
 
RedSquare said:
this is exactly how it works.

the notion that "one guy" determines who commits and who doesn't, is completely false.

the other thing about banda, is yes, he gets a lot of help in how coaches up these kids. But he has a ton of potential and has certain coaching qualities that you can't teach. it's why he's there. to think otherwise is to say: " many diaz and mark richt don't know what they are doing"

and another thing: your talent as a player has ZERO to do with your talent as a coach. the examples of this throughout history are too numerous to mention, but if talent as a player meant you could automatically be a great coach, then michael Jordan wouldn't have sucked mooseco*k when he tried to coach an NBA team.
Click to expand...
In large part the player/coaching arguement is true. However there is plenty of exceptions based upon what made the players succeed. For instance players like ed reed,ray lewis even adrian they will be amazing coaches if they choose to be. Because there approaches are all cerebral. They are all amazing hard workers & leaders. Communication & work ethic/preparation is what sets apart coaches. A player who succeeded because of his physical tools is far less likely to be a good coach.
 
Advertisement
Brooklyndee said:
In large part the player/coaching arguement is true. However there is plenty of exceptions based upon what made the players succeed. For instance players like ed reed,ray lewis even adrian they will be amazing coaches if they choose to be. Because there approaches are all cerebral. They are all amazing hard workers & leaders. Communication & work ethic/preparation is what sets apart coaches. A player who succeeded because of his physical tools is far less likely to be a good coach.
Click to expand...

this!
 
Brooklyndee said:
In large part the player/coaching arguement is true. However there is plenty of exceptions based upon what made the players succeed. For instance players like ed reed,ray lewis even adrian they will be amazing coaches if they choose to be. Because there approaches are all cerebral. They are all amazing hard workers & leaders. Communication & work ethic/preparation is what sets apart coaches. A player who succeeded because of his physical tools is far less likely to be a good coach.
Click to expand...
Carrying on from the cerebral note, I remember seeing Ed Reed would spend hours on end in the film room. If at all, in what time frame do you see him being a part of the staff?
 
Advertisement
The fact still remains...since ive followed recruiting.Rumph has the most misses ive ever seen in the short time period.
Not speaking on him as an instructional coach but his recruiting is subpar at best. He never did it before so he was essentially learning on the job...seems hes coming around this recruiting period.
 
gogeta4 said:
The fact still remains...since ive followed recruiting.Rumph has the most misses ive ever seen in the short time period.
Not speaking on him as an instructional coach but his recruiting is subpar at best. He never did it before so he was essentially learning on the job...seems hes coming around this recruiting period.
Click to expand...
So you think Rumph has more misses than Banda? Prove it.
 
gogeta4 said:
The fact still remains...since ive followed recruiting.Rumph has the most misses ive ever seen in the short time period.
Not speaking on him as an instructional coach but his recruiting is subpar at best. He never did it before so he was essentially learning on the job...seems hes coming around this recruiting period.
Click to expand...

You're on the money!

And here's what people miss over & over again.

It's not necessarily that Rumph or Kool is "bad" at recruiting, it's the opportunity cost we pay by not having someone who is absolutely exceptional at recruiting there instead!

Look at Dugans & Hartley. Look at how effective they are and how much that is moving our program forward. You can see real quick how having an exceptional recruiter comes back in spades over just an OK one. Yea they get help internally from Daugherty, Jorge and ultimately CMR - but because they're so exceptional at recruiting, it's just icing on the cake at that point when they bring families and need help from the HC & internal team to seal the deal.
 
Last edited:
gogeta4 said:
The fact still remains...since ive followed recruiting.Rumph has the most misses ive ever seen in the short time period.
Not speaking on him as an instructional coach but his recruiting is subpar at best. He never did it before so he was essentially learning on the job...seems hes coming around this recruiting period.
Click to expand...
Idiotic post, of course it would seem like he has more “misses” than other positions because of the sheer volume of cb prospects south Florida produces, he got his fair share of wins too now
 
Advertisement
Back
Top