- Joined
- Sep 29, 2014
- Messages
- 4,946
U are funny.
I'm just trying to understand you, my G.
I mean ****.. Do you actually read the **** you type?
Help us help you.
U are funny.
If we're going strictly off recruiting rankings, Texas A&M and Clemson are more talented and UNC is probably a toss up.we have the talent to win every game on our schedule. We wont win them all, but not because we're less talented, other than Clemson maybe
having the best QB on the field makes a big difference too, which we'll have vs all 3 of those teamsIf we're going strictly off recruiting rankings, Texas A&M and Clemson are more talented and UNC is probably a toss up.
I know I can't.You can't talk me out of it
Go back to sleep.I'm fascinated at the sudden effort to lower expectations by some here (not just in this thread). 2 years ago we were 8-2 regular season with one of those losses to the #1 team. Last year if Van Dyke had been starting from the beginning we likely would have eeked out those 3 and 4 more points against UVA and UNC, giving us 9 wins. He starts this year from the beginning with much more experience.
And what sort of "predictions" did we hear at the beginning of the last 2 seasons from CIS? Not so much predictions as angry demands that there are "no excuses" for anything less than 10 wins and that failure to do that would be a "fireable offense." Well where did all that go? We've been reading gushing comments for the last couple of month about how outrageously more competent this new staff is than the last one, so with the new class and new coaches, why is lack of talent such a limitation that was NOT supposed to limit the last staff?
Were people lying before about their expectations? Or are they lying now about the vast difference between the staffs? Pick one. You can't have it both ways
This. Playoff talk should not even been on the table until at the latest 2024 if the recruiting and development trend up. Have to also hope around that time Garcia/Brown have fully matured at the QB postion.Easily enough talent and depth to win the Coastal. Maybe enough depth and talent to win the ACC if Clemson struggles again. Nowhere near enough talent or depth yet to compete in the playoffs against teams like Bamma or UGA.
People with low IQ’s knee jerk to situations all the time. The same ones thinking playoffs or championships will be the same ones to kill Mario when he loses his first game, instead of having perspective on the situation.Why can’t this fan base be patient? How about setting your expectations for the ‘23 and ‘24 seasons?
My Mfkn dawg!!! Talk to these n!ggas mane.I'm fascinated at the sudden effort to lower expectations by some here (not just in this thread). 2 years ago we were 8-2 regular season with one of those losses to the #1 team. Last year if Van Dyke had been starting from the beginning we likely would have eeked out those 3 and 4 more points against UVA and UNC, giving us 9 wins. He starts this year from the beginning with much more experience.
And what sort of "predictions" did we hear at the beginning of the last 2 seasons from CIS? Not so much predictions as angry demands that there are "no excuses" for anything less than 10 wins and that failure to do that would be a "fireable offense." Well where did all that go? We've been reading gushing comments for the last couple of month about how outrageously more competent this new staff is than the last one, so with the new class and new coaches, why is lack of talent such a limitation that was NOT supposed to limit the last staff?
Were people lying before about their expectations? Or are they lying now about the vast difference between the staffs? Pick one. You can't have it both ways