D
deleted19794
Guest
When you get another break from day care, post something with some substance or refute my post that you responded to!You are really g.ay.
When you get another break from day care, post something with some substance or refute my post that you responded to!You are really g.ay.
You realize that we still got Joe Jackson, Jon garvin, Jon Ford, Greg Rousseau, and Nesta ******* Silvera right? Even with as little effort Kool put into recruiting, thats what he was still able to get.
I think the problem is that Richt and Diaz underestimated his recruiting ability from the getgo. Remember everyone saying Kool had complete control of who we target recruiting wise at DL and who we offer? Well thats a problem when the dude doesn't really care much about recruiting. If we had somone like Hartley, Banda, or Patke doing the heavy lifting for the DL recruiting from the very beginning, I doubt we'd be in the position depth wise we are.
The problem wasn't the skill of the players we got. The problem was there wasn't a plan. Theres no way in **** we should have been left with 5 ******* DEs this year. Thats a problem. But that could have been solved, even with Kool as coach. He's a great coach, and this is a loss, even if we bring in KP or Partridge.
I mean thats my point. Even with a guy who couldn't care less about recruiting we got studs. My point wasn't to show Kool was such a good recruiter we got them.joe jack really wanted to be a cane he committed to golden, gravin was a under the radar kid until the end, ford lost some steam with the bigger schools, roseau is a project kid, the only one that was elite and had major schools going after was silvera and he wavered at times, kool was so trash at recruiting dude was a amazing teacher but his recruiting success is that of rumphs in terms of who he got
see broke I'm critical of another coaches recruiting failures
Let's be real, our sacks improved because Diaz blitzes every play. Michael Sam won SEC defensive player of the year with 11.5 sacks, yet he couldn't make a NFL roster.
I mean thats my point. Even with a guy who couldn't care less about recruiting we got studs. My point wasn't to show Kool was such a good recruiter we got them.
Thats not going to change next yr or the year after regardless who our DL coach is. We're still going to get local studs that want to be Canes just like Jackson, Garvin, Rousseau. So at the very least with a guy that hates recruiting we'll be okay. The problem was there was no plan for what we needed, because Kool just didn't care, and it left us with poor depth especially at DE. But This yrs DE/DT class is loaded. All we need to do is land 3 DTs and 3-4 DEs and we are gucci.
DT: Daxon, Brown, Sorrels and maybe derrick Hunter
DE: Bogle, Williams for sure. Then add 2 of Ingraham, Summerall, Jafhari Harvey, maybe a nation dude like Thibodeaux, Hinton, etc etc
You realize that we still got Joe Jackson, Jon garvin, Jon Ford, Greg Rousseau, and Nesta ******* Silvera right? Even with as little effort Kool put into recruiting, thats what he was still able to get.
I think the problem is that Richt and Diaz underestimated his recruiting ability from the getgo. Remember everyone saying Kool had complete control of who we target recruiting wise at DL and who we offer? Well thats a problem when the dude doesn't really care much about recruiting. If we had somone like Hartley, Banda, or Patke doing the heavy lifting for the DL recruiting from the very beginning, I doubt we'd be in the position depth wise we are.
The problem wasn't the skill of the players we got. The problem was there wasn't a plan. Theres no way in **** we should have been left with 5 ******* DEs this year. Thats a problem. But that could have been solved, even with Kool as coach. He's a great coach, and this is a loss, even if we bring in KP or Partridge.
Yeah I'm sure Saban will just let him coastThe NFL is loaded with those type of guys, so i don't think that played a role. I just think he was comfortable at Mizzou doing his thing, being good at it, and being left alone. Miami is a different animal. I do think he enjoyed molding kids as well and watching them burst on to the scene. Most Dline coaches in the NFL get zero credit.....it all goes to the players.
I think what kept Kool from the NFL is the hours and the grind. He didn't have to grind at Mizzou, he didn't want to grind at Miami and he would be expected to grind in the NFL with the longer season, off-season camps, etc.
Kool is so bad that Nick Saban, the most successful college coach in modern times, hired him! Kool is one of the most respected D Line coaches in the business and his players showed that on the field. People come here spewing nonsense, "he can't recruit," "he's lazy," and so on. Here's what I know, he had the best D Lines in the last 15 years at Miami and anyone debating that has no clue. Saban's other interview was Partridge and from the latest updates he is our top target.miami got them, not kul
kul is terrible
Position coaches get paid for developing players and Kool did a better job than anyone in the country developing D linemen. The following are Mizzou guys with their star ratings coming out of high school:
How many of those guys did UM recruit? How many D-Linemen did we have drafted in the first round in the last 10 years?
- Charles Harris – 2 star, 1st rd NFL draft pick
- Shane Ray – 3 star, 1st rd
- Aldon Smith – 3 star, 1st rd
- Ziggy Hood – 3 star, 1st rd
- Markus Golden – 3 star juco, 2nd rd
- Kony Ealy – 4 star, 2nd rd
Now pair that with the development of UM's D linemen during Kool's tenure here and get back to me. Also, your Saban conspiracy theory is in line with believing in the Easter Bunny. I guess the Rooney's called Saban two months ago and told him the Steelers were going to hire Karl Dunbar sometime in early February. After the call, Nick called Kool and told him "Don't recruit at Miami, I will hire you in two months at Bama!"
A job at Bama came open on February 8th, Kool interviewed, and was offered the job. He took it because it is more money and a better situation for him and his family.
Kool is so bad that Nick Saban, the most successful college coach in modern times, hired him! Kool is one of the most respected D Line coaches in the business and his players showed that on the field. People come here spewing nonsense, "he can't recruit," "he's lazy," and so on. Here's what I know, he had the best D Lines in the last 15 years at Miami and anyone debating that has no clue. Saban's other interview was Partridge and from the latest updates he is our top target.
That's fantastic. For 30 years of coaching.
As the HC during mostly probation-filled years, how many guys went in the first round during the Butch era? And that was 5 years.
No bonus points for not being able to get big-time players.
All that shows is that you can't recruit well and/or are too lazy to do the work.
That's fantastic. For 30 years of coaching.
As the HC during mostly probation-filled years, how many guys went in the first round during the Butch era? And that was 5 years.
No bonus points for not being able to get big-time players.
All that shows is that you can't recruit well and/or are too lazy to do the work.
who cares what an incredible technician he is if he doesn't have anyone to teach it to
Yep the difference is recruiting, and you either have it or you don’tWhen did the fake argument morph into UM fans saying Tool sucks? Who are you even arguing against? Tool is a very good technician. No one doubts that or questions it. That's only half the job as a position coach though. Aggressive and hard recruiting is where we can upgrade significantly.
I think people are putting too much stock in the technical expertise of position coaches. Everything Tool knows is available to any other DL coach who studies his craft diligently. He holds no magical pixie dust when it comes to technique.
He, like every other coach in the world, gets a lot smarter when he has better players to work with. Put Tyreic Martin and Ryan Big Hoss Fines out there instead of RJ McIntosh and Norton, and then tell me what a genius Tool is.
When did the fake argument morph into UM fans saying Tool sucks? Who are you even arguing against? Tool is a very good technician. No one doubts that or questions it. That's only half the job as a position coach though. Aggressive and hard recruiting is where we can upgrade significantly.
I think people are putting too much stock in the technical expertise of position coaches. Everything Tool knows is available to any other DL coach who studies his craft diligently. He holds no magical pixie dust when it comes to technique.
He, like every other coach in the world, gets a lot smarter when he has better players to work with. Put Tyreic Martin and Ryan Big Hoss Fines out there instead of RJ McIntosh and Norton, and then tell me what a genius Tool is.