forums

CFP Selection Committee to incorporate "new data point"

NC_Canes_11 said:
It matters. They’ve already showed AP vs CFP ranking the past couple years. They’re overwhelmingly the same.
Click to expand...


I'm not disagreeing with that point as to the first CFP vote. What I AM saying is that if they NOW add this new "data point", it would have possibly put Indiana at the bottom of the "top 25 ranked" Big 10 teams last year. Which is hilarious.

Of Indiana's 9 Big 10 regular season wins last year, 6 of them came against the 7 worst teams in the Big 10. Abysmal. But Indiana was "the best" when it came time to the Big 10 Championship. And in the CFP rounds.

So, I don't know...maybe strength of schedule is...deceptive? Obviously, you have to use SOMETHING, I just find it hilarious that the "best team in the country" in 2025 had one of the weakest possible conference slates.
 
So Miami goes 3-0 against the SEC last year. The ACC goes 8-6 vs the SEC last year. Georgia Tech plays a down to the wire game with UGA for the second year in a row.

Louisville almost beats Ole Miss this year, arguably the best team in the SEC. NC State beats Vandy (and then doesn't). FSU, who is terrible, is beating Bama for the second year in a row late into the game.

Are these data points? Because you'd think the ACC is absolute trash based on narratives yet the SEC seems to not be near the level the network pretends it to be.
 
HighPerformance said:
LuCane said:
Lmao. What a joke.
Click to expand...
Why is it a joke? Is it because Miami happens to play in the ACC and this metric will be more of a detriment to teams in the ACC- and teams in the SEC and BIG, who play in a tougher conference, will get a much deserved benefit? Isn’t that how it should be?
Click to expand...
Tougher conference based on what? Random people saying Missouri is better than Duke or Oregon is better than Louisville? The point is, random people and networks who have agendas will always skew towards what fits their narrative.

Duke won the ACC, started 3-0 with two wins vs power 4 teams and still unranked. A Big10 or SEC team with that resume is likely top 15 if not higher.

So come the end of the season, this extra metric will be used to favor certain conferences
 
TheOriginalCane said:
I'm not disagreeing with that point as to the first CFP vote. What I AM saying is that if they NOW add this new "data point", it would have possibly put Indiana at the bottom of the "top 25 ranked" Big 10 teams last year. Which is hilarious.

Of Indiana's 9 Big 10 regular season wins last year, 6 of them came against the 7 worst teams in the Big 10. Abysmal. But Indiana was "the best" when it came time to the Big 10 Championship. And in the CFP rounds.

So, I don't know...maybe strength of schedule is...deceptive? Obviously, you have to use SOMETHING, I just find it hilarious that the "best team in the country" in 2025 had one of the weakest possible conference slates.
Click to expand...
Right but it’s not for that situation. I don’t think this is gonna hurt teams who go undefeated, unless they’re up against another undefeated team. But they’re in anyway. This is a way to manufacture the 7-12 seeds they want in.
 
TwentySix said:
Are some on this board still telling themselves the ACC is actually an advantage because we have an easier path to the playoffs? Just curious.
Click to expand...
I couldnt believe that ****.. Lol.. Some actually still dont get that ACC is a dead league and its just the titanic taking its time to fill with water and sink.. Its faith was sealed long ago with tv deal.
 
NC_Canes_11 said:
Why is LSU ranked ahead of Louisville? Why isn’t Duke ranked? Why is Texas A&M ranked (especially ahead of a team that just dominated them on their home field)? Why is Oregon ranked? Why isn’t WVU ranked?
Click to expand...
Don't forget about micheatagain. Every one knows they got beat by WMU yet they're ranked.. to give oklahoma a quality loss. It's a ******* joke at this point.
 
NC_Canes_11 said:
Why is LSU ranked ahead of Louisville? Why isn’t Duke ranked? Why is Texas A&M ranked (especially ahead of a team that just dominated them on their home field)? Why is Oregon ranked? Why isn’t WVU ranked?
Click to expand...
Another issue or one that might get missed is when you silo to your conference and play nobody,, you can just hop on Indiana plan and get top 10 rank when done with weak ooc schedule.. Penn St. is already up to 13 and they play NOBODY...



 
LuCane said:
The problem isn't the top tier of those conferences getting their due credit. It's the inflated teams getting more credit than earned merely to provide a safety net to teams who also occasionally lose games to garbage teams. It's a nonsense system mostly at the bottom of the Top 25. Your evidence is blue chip ratio? Missouri is currently ranked 19th with a blue chip ratio around 34%. There are 6 ACC teams with the same or higher blue chip ratio. There are another 4 ACC teams right around that or close (less than 7 percentage points). Are those teams getting the same inflation Missouri or Miss St receive? Nope. It's inflation and ESPN has a conflict of interest.
Click to expand...
This. If Texas beats a trash Missouri team by 9 points, it’s a “tough SEC win” because the pollsters have overrated Missouri. Meanwhile an ACC or Big XII team with a similar resume will go unranked.
 
LuCane said:
The problem isn't the top tier of those conferences getting their due credit. It's the inflated teams getting more credit than earned merely to provide a safety net to teams who also occasionally lose games to garbage teams. It's a nonsense system mostly toward the bottom of the Top 25. Your evidence is blue chip ratio? Missouri is currently ranked 19th with a blue chip ratio around 34%. There are 6 ACC teams with the same or higher blue chip ratio. There are another 4 ACC teams right around that or close (less than 7 percentage points). Are those teams getting the same inflation Missouri or Miss St receive? Nope. Can't fairly view this until that's reconciled.
Click to expand...
And why isn’t it already entirely accounted for in SOS and SOR? Lmao.
 
LuCane said:
The problem isn't the top tier of those conferences getting their due credit. It's the inflated teams getting more credit than earned merely to provide a safety net to teams who also occasionally lose games to garbage teams. It's a nonsense system mostly toward the bottom of the Top 25. Your evidence is blue chip ratio? Missouri is currently ranked 19th with a blue chip ratio around 34%. There are 6 ACC teams with the same or higher blue chip ratio. There are another 4 ACC teams right around that or close (less than 7 percentage points). Are those teams getting the same inflation Missouri or Miss St receive? Nope. Can't fairly view this until that's reconciled.
Click to expand...

The Missouri scam. I feel like they’re ranked every year around the T15 on their way to 7-5.
 
HighPerformance said:
Throwing out made up “facts” about Wake doesn’t really mean much. Miami fans like you have a weird complex when it comes to the strength of a conference. The ACC has consistently been several notches below the SEC- no reasonable person would argue that.

Don’t blame me for it- blame that troll of a president at Miami for being in the ACC.

But to think teams in the SEC or BIG shouldn’t be given the benefit of the doubt over ACC or BIg 12 teams is a notch below being retarded.
Click to expand...
Thanks Token
 
Back
Top