scrantoncane
Sophomore
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 3,193
I am in agreement re: Lashlee - not only the Brevin/Mallory scheming failure, but the RBs should've been used in tandem better as well. Also agree on the route tree... Lashlee showed the ability to scheme guys open, but he didn't really show the ability to maximize the players' abilities and create space. The King jab step was his most effective means of scheming guys open.He’s never gotten a chance to high point the ball or use his height / athletic ability. Lashlee didn’t impress me how he used the two te’s together. His route concepts didn’t blow me away either , it’s not malzahn bad , but still. Mallory is 6’5 255 with good athletic ability. He should constantly be motioning / flexing out wide in the red zone. Leaving BJ inline , then throw jump balls or post ups to Mallory if he has a smaller defender on him. Being In 22 personnel inside the five would’ve be an issue with our two te’s. The defense would have to go big because of the formation then you’d have our te’s on higher players or a cb/s on Mallory flanked out.
Mallory and BJ are different players , so hopefully we don’t use Mallory the exact same way as Brevin.
That said, it doesn't excuse Mallory's lack of production. Chaney and Knighton saw plenty of snaps as Fr. That leads me to believe the best guy played. Brevin went in the 5th round and Mallory couldn't pass him? I get the injury concerns dropped Brevin's stock, but those same injuries also gave Mallory a huge opportunity to steal his spot. Isn't there some saying in the 30 for 30 documentary, something like "if we got hurt, we knew we would lose our starting spot so we played through pain"? Now I'm supposed to believe Mallory is better than Brevin?
So far I see a Greentree All-Star. By no means am I writing him off, but he needs to show it to me.