Mnhurricane
Assistant to the regional manager
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
- Messages
- 3,180
This is the internet version of self harm. You’re setting yourself up for failure
Yeap we are not winning the coastal. So sad because the coastal sucks.We aren't winning the coastal... the end. That ship sailed last week. Miami has 3 road games again ACC teams that have better records (FSU, Pitt, Duke). Miami has been downright ugly on the road for the last 2-3 years. Great if we win out but I'm not counting on wins before that changes.
The best case scenario for this program is Miami winning out and...Virginia also winning out...
Took them almost halfway into the season.Coastal? I'm just happy we beat a P5 team.
We don’t...im like do we really want to see this oline vs clemson
Chances are low but still a chance. Let’s keep our ACCCG aspirations in this thread going forward. I’ll update it each week:
#6 in the Coastal
Need UVA to lose to Duke and or UNC.
Need UNC to lose to Duke and or Pitt
Need VT to lose to UNC, Wake, UVA, PITT,
GT is going to all but eliminate themselves.
Miami obviously needs to win out.
Let’s see how the games play the test of the season! We aren’t eliminated yet.
8-4 and 4th-5th in the Coastal.......with losses to Gaytas and Willie the Clown.....Manny fails the "Corch" litmus test9 and 3 or 8 and 4. Dont care about the acc champ game. Give me the Orlando bowl though
Wouldn’t that go to Virginia?
We aren't winning the coastal... the end. That ship sailed last week. Miami has 3 road games again ACC teams that have better records (FSU, Pitt, Duke). Miami has been downright ugly on the road for the last 2-3 years. Great if we win out but I'm not counting on wins before that changes.
Gotcha. Hard to think of us as ranked I guessIt would go to the higher ranked team and I’d think we would outrank them if we had the same record.
And if all this happens we go get our doors blown off, AGAIN, by Clemson???? That’s sounds exciting!Make this easier:
1. Miami wins out, beats GaTech, at Pitt, at F$U, Louisville, at Duke, finishes 6-2 in ACC with losses to UNC and VaTech.
2. Virginia must lose ONE (preferably two) of Duke, at Louisville, at UNC, GaTech, VaTech.
3. UNC must lose TWO of at VaTech, Duke, Virginia, at Pitt, at NC State.
4. Duke would lose head-to-head tiebreak to Miami (assuming #1), so it would be nice to have them lose one of GaTech, at UVa, UNC, Syracuse, at Wake Forest.
5. Pitt would lose head-to-heat tiebreak to Miami (assuming #1), so it would be nice to have them lose one of at Syracuse, at GaTech, UNC, at VaTech, Boston College.
6. VaTech must lose ONE of UNC, Wake Forest, at GaTech, Pitt, at UVa.
---GaTech is out (assuming #1).
So, for Week 7:
4. Root for GaTech to beat Duke (completes #4).
For Week 8:
2. Root for Duke to beat UVa (completes #2).
5. Root for Syracuse to beat Pitt (completes #5).
That's it, take it one week at a time. UVa MUST lose 1, UNC MUST lose 2, VaTech MUST lose 1.
UVa plays VaTech, so one will lose. UVa plays UNC, so one will lose. UNC plays VaTech, so one will lose.
1. ACC Teams have a set number of ACC games. That number is 8.
2. If you look at the schedules of UNC and Wake, you’ll see that number is 9.
3. UNC and Wake petitioned the ACC to play that game as an “out-of-conference” game (Before the season)...maybe neither wanted to play ODU.
4. That’s why the UNC loss, and the Wake win does NOT count towards their ACC standings totals; It was an “out-of-conference“ game.
I think it’s a decent strategy that allows teams to stay connected to conference teams they rarely play. Here’s a decent article on a proposal to change that that references the ACC even though the article addresses the issue from the framework of the SEC
Why the SEC needs to scrap divisions, and more Week 6 thoughts
When Florida and Auburn play only once or twice a decade, it's a problem. Here's how to fix it.www.espn.com
it was brought up a while back. Basically, NC teams need to play each other once every so often as conference games. Wake and UNC were going to hit that mark this year so they forced them to play with the condition that it would not be a conf game