Bandas comment that bothers me

Advertisement
Some of you dudes are just straight up idiots. You either aren't Miami fans, never actually played tackle football or just trolls. Tackling is the single most important task of the 11 guys on defense so STFU and go complain about something else. Its a dumb interview that you all get bent out of shape about.
 
Bro ..... you good , your not the only one i'm sure. Many of us fans are a little sick and tired of the coaches why' it didn't??? instead of the how... it work!!!!

(If they want Knowles on the field because of tacking then move him in the box because he dang sure can't cover anyone!) He probably be a better fit . Coach Banda missed me on that 1 . SMDH

Damnnn once again... I missed this Coaching ish!!! 📝 🗒 🖇
Go Canes!

I rewatched the CMU game and CMU QB was hitting targets and a few times Ivey got balls caught on him but he was in position and it just got by him, but on some of the longer passes it seemed like Knowles made the tackles from behind but had bad coverage and that’s why WR was open.

I’m guessing we aren’t recruiting safety’s that can’t tackle so Bandas whole comment doesn’t make sense
 
Some of you dudes are just straight up idiots. You either aren't Miami fans, never actually played tackle football or just trolls. Tackling is the single most important task of the 11 guys on defense so STFU and go complain about something else. Its a dumb interview that you all get bent out of shape about.

Who ****ed in your captain crunch????

Like previously posted obviously tackling is important and most important but than why does everyone ***** when we sign a LB who runs a 5.3 but can tackle????? That’s because there’s more to it than just tackling, if we recruiting 5.3 LB we wouldn’t beat anyone. Other skills are important not just tackling
 
You guys love to overract. Perhaps playing Knowles against lesser teams is a ploy to get Gurvan to push harder and develop as a player? Coaches do stuff like that all the time.
 
I rewatched the CMU game and CMU QB was hitting targets and a few times Ivey got balls caught on him but he was in position and it just got by him, but on some of the longer passes it seemed like Knowles made the tackles from behind but had bad coverage and that’s why WR was open.

I’m guessing we aren’t recruiting safety’s that can’t tackle so Bandas whole comment doesn’t make sense


Exactly bro! Doesn't make sense at all . As coaches you have to put your best players on the field to win not how long they been with a team. This is the common theme here. Forget that mess! Miss me on that.
 
You guys love to overract. Perhaps playing Knowles against lesser teams is a ploy to get Gurvan to push harder and develop as a player? Coaches do stuff like that all the time.


My brother with respect not when it's 17 to 12 and you about to lose against CMU. You can't be serious?
 
Colbert
Jenkins
Johnson
Redwine

All were beasts here. All are in the show.

And all some people on here can do is rail on Robert Knowles and bad angles by a freshman.
 
Advertisement
Exactly bro! Doesn't make sense at all . As coaches you have to put your best players on the field to win not how long they been with a team. This is the common theme here. Forget that mess! Miss me on that.

I guess what this reminded me of is when we all got mad at that clip of DNofrio saying offer the kid because he’s not exceptional at anything other than safety, and that was a reason to justify offering him. To me that shows us passing on other more athletic guys because you as a coach don’t feel like you can mold them.

I guess I’ve never been impressed by Banda, he reminds me of the guy who can BS his way into successful roles but all his peers know he doesn’t know 💩 about coaching.

Remember Richt was promoting both Banda and Patke to Co DC, why do you think that was???? He thought he needed Banda to keep recruits but knew he doesn’t know how to call successful plays, POOF that’s why Patke was getting named CO DC. We had no other reason to promote Patke, he wasn’t recruiting at a high level.
 
@For_The_U its been mentioned before kids go to Rumph for technique questions.
But you can't have it both ways. You can't bag on Banda for poor safety play, say he can't develop players and he's dog sh-t and needs to be fired... and then turn around and say Banda DOESN'T deserve credit when safeties play well or develop really well like Redwine did. That makes no sense.
 
But you can't have it both ways. You can't bag on Banda for poor safety play, say he can't develop players and he's dog sh-t and needs to be fired... and then turn around and say Banda DOESN'T deserve credit when safeties play well or develop really well like Redwine did. That makes no sense.

Sometimes things that seem cut and dry aren’t always as is. It doesn’t matter either way he’s Mannys boy and isn’t going anywhere

Banda is Mannys Recruiting Pitbull. Guy doesn’t always land the kids but that’s is niche. Manny says you need to visit XYZ recruit he’s going.

I think we need to appreciate Rumph as a coach more
 
Sometimes things that seem cut and dry aren’t always as is. It doesn’t matter either way he’s Mannys boy and isn’t going anywhere


One guy playing great isn’t cut and dry. What happened with Jenkins and especially Colbert in one year then then the way Redwine turned into a monster by his senior year makes it crystal clear he’s done a GREAT job developing guys.
 
One guy playing great isn’t cut and dry. What happened with Jenkins and especially Colbert in one year then then the way Redwine turned into a monster by his senior year makes it crystal clear he’s done a GREAT job developing guys.

I’m saying Banda is contributing to getting some of these kids here but Rumph is doing more with teaching them.
 
Sometimes things that seem cut and dry aren’t always as is. It doesn’t matter either way he’s Mannys boy and isn’t going anywhere

Banda is Mannys Recruiting Pitbull. Guy doesn’t always land the kids but that’s is niche. Manny says you need to visit XYZ recruit he’s going.

I think we need to appreciate Rumph as a coach more
I definitely agree re Rumph. Huge fan of that dude.
 
Advertisement
Am I overreacting?

Banda in interview today when discussing the progression of Hall and saying first couple games it’s what he expected (a lot of running around not knowing what he’s doing) and Knowles over took him because of how well he tackled. Banda than said speaking about Hall progressing is he got better at “The Only Thing I Care about, which is tackling”.

Just seemed like an odd comment, while tackling in open space is obviously important what about coverage?

I read it as Hall has recently improved his tackling; seems like he wants to keep Hall positive.
I’m sure there are many factors Banda considers regarding safety play; they likely have a checklist with graduate asisitants charting all the factors and the player’s performance.
Coverage is assuredly one factor. Recall (as a few unfavorable examples) the UNC game where Hall was too far behind the receiver on 4th and 17 and then got beat in coverage for the winning TD a few plays later.
 
Agreed but I think a lot of that is because of Rumph not really Bandas X and Os skill

So Rumph is more responsable for the development of Redwine than Banda?

Rumph actually coached him and couldn’t do anything with him... According to BrooklynDee , Redwine was so bad that Banda lost a coin flip to Rumph had to coach him ..

And our CBs have taken a huge step back this year too. Tackling has been a big issue, getting off blocks has been garbage and they were getting torched by those UNC WRs
 
So Rumph is more responsable for the development of Redwine than Banda?

Rumph actually coached him and couldn’t do anything with him... According to BrooklynDee , Redwine was so bad that Banda lost a coin flip to Rumph had to coach him ..

And our CBs have taken a huge step back this year too. Tackling has been a big issue, getting off blocks has been garbage and they were getting torched by those UNC WRs

Rumph couldn’t do anything with him because he’s not a fit for CB not that he was uncoachable
 
Back
Top