forums

Arch vs Mateer

OBLIVION said:
Mateer has actually shown he can be good within the right situation while Manning hasn’t.
Click to expand...

Yeah just has to play powder puffs like did at WSU

Trumpycane initially liked Mateer and then checked out his game logs

Was bad against any team with a pulse at WSU

9-19 1 TD 1 INT against TT
17-34 1 TD 1 INT against Washington
17-35 0 TD, 1 INT against Fresno

18 of his 29 passing touchdowns came against Portland State, Hawaii, Utah State, New Mexico, San Diego State

And another 4 against San Jose State
 
Numb Nuts said:
Before the season, you had Arch listed as one of the top 5 players going into the 2026 season. You had Toney, Jeremiah Smith, Colin Simmons, Arch, and CJ Carr...and you even said "in no particular order" meaning Arch very well could be your pick as the best player in college football which would CERTAINLY garner him #1 overall pick and a generational talent. But now he's downgraded to simply a first round pick. Only matter of time before you have him as a 4th rounder (and that might still be too high).
Click to expand...
Yeah, he's not playing as well as the other guys.

Not a step back but not a huge step forward.
 
DMoney said:
Very good prospect. Not generational. In a perfect world, he stays another year. More of a first-round pick than a #1 overall right now.
Click to expand...
First round is being kind D, very kind. Maybe if he stays another year but what he’s put out so far, is not first round quarterback material.
 
DMoney said:
Yeah, he's not playing as well as the other guys.

Not a step back but not a huge step forward.
Click to expand...

Not a step back because if he took one more step back, he'd fall right off that perch that the media put him on - he literally has nowhere else to go but forward. I'm not gonna say Arch sucks, but he sure does a stellar job of underwhelming.....which is the verbal equivalent of "not a step back but not a huge step forward".
 
Back
Top