forums

Another coaching blooper reel

Advertisement
So if everything is standard run of the mill defenses that other teams run, what is the problem? This question is for coach Macho and please don't tell me the players are missing their assignments. Theres clearly a coaching problem.
 
So basically we got outschemed on that play and put ourselves in a position where there's a guaranteed five yard pick up, because theres no way crawford can get up there fast enough to make a real play there.

Thats what im getting out of this. And if both the TE and WR go out, how does burns cover both of them if they both go to his zone?
 
weownfsu said:
So basically we got outschemed on that play and put ourselves in a position where there's a guaranteed five yard pick up, because theres no way crawford can get up there fast enough to make a real play there.

Thats what im getting out of this. And if both the TE and WR go out, how does burns cover both of them if they both go to his zone?
Click to expand...

SMH. Oh man.

#1 - I'm talkin about the Strong Safety that's lined up over the #2 receiver. Not talkin about Crawford lined up deep.

#2 - Burns only has a TE on his side. The only passing threats that can threaten his zone are the TE or Running Back.


If you move Burns over to the 3 Wide Receiver side, like you're hinting at, THEN NOBODY WOULD BE COVERING PASS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SCREEN!
 
NVA CANE said:
So if everything is standard run of the mill defenses that other teams run, what is the problem? This question is for coach Macho and please don't tell me the players are missing their assignments. Theres clearly a coaching problem.
Click to expand...

There is no problem on this particular play.
 
Coach Macho said:
weownfsu said:
So basically we got outschemed on that play and put ourselves in a position where there's a guaranteed five yard pick up, because theres no way crawford can get up there fast enough to make a real play there.

Thats what im getting out of this. And if both the TE and WR go out, how does burns cover both of them if they both go to his zone?
Click to expand...

SMH. Oh man.

#1 - I'm talkin about the Strong Safety that's lined up over the #2 receiver. Not talkin about Crawford lined up deep.

#2 - Burns only has a TE on his side. The only passing threats that can threaten his zone are the TE or Running Back.


If you move Burns over to the 3 Wide Receiver side, like you're hinting at, THEN NOBODY WOULD BE COVERING PASS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SCREEN!
Click to expand...

My bad, I meant RB. If the only passing threats that can threaten his zone are the RB and TE, what happens when both of them go to his zone? How does he cover both of them?

So basically, we put our players in positions where they're outnumbered and still expect them to make the play. I'm beginning to understand why our defense sucks so badly.
 
weownfsu said:
Coach Macho said:
weownfsu said:
So basically we got outschemed on that play and put ourselves in a position where there's a guaranteed five yard pick up, because theres no way crawford can get up there fast enough to make a real play there.

Thats what im getting out of this. And if both the TE and WR go out, how does burns cover both of them if they both go to his zone?
Click to expand...

SMH. Oh man.

#1 - I'm talkin about the Strong Safety that's lined up over the #2 receiver. Not talkin about Crawford lined up deep.

#2 - Burns only has a TE on his side. The only passing threats that can threaten his zone are the TE or Running Back.


If you move Burns over to the 3 Wide Receiver side, like you're hinting at, THEN NOBODY WOULD BE COVERING PASS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SCREEN!
Click to expand...

My bad, I meant RB. If the only passing threats that can threaten his zone are the RB and TE, what happens when both of them go to his zone? How does he cover both of them?

So basically, we put our players in positions where they're outnumbered and still expect them to make the play. I'm beginning to understand why our defense sucks so badly.
Click to expand...

Burns isn't the only defender on that side of the ball dude.

There's a LB and Burns.

LB would cover the RB. Burns would cover the TE.
 
OK, so riddle me this: why is the OLB on top of PErryman in the pic lined up where he is? Why he isn't he lined up closer to the WR's so he can make a play on the slot guy if it's a quick pass?
 
Advertisement
yeah i don't see anything wrong with the first one... burns was in his right position...
 
Coach Macho said:
See, I don't mind if people are gonna dog the pre-snap alignments but atleast know WTF you're talkin about.

The first play in question...

Burns HAS to be on the TE side. We're playing zone. Who do you think is covering the TE if he goes vertical? Also, what if they run toss? The problem is yall don't know the difference between zone and man. In zone, LB's match up with WR's all the time. Burn is either playing Cover-2, in which case he has the flats, or Cover-3 where he has the TE releasing vertical. The Linebacker that's lined up on the #2 is covering flats. Just cause he's got a ******' WR across from him doesn't mean he's playing man on him. SMH


Honestly, not a single alignment (screen shot) in this thread is wrong. They're all pretty standard.
Click to expand...

If the opponent was 50-50 run, pass I'd agree with you. But with Nebraska that isn't the case. We already knew Ameer was going to get 30+ touches.
 
weownfsu said:
imlive365 said:
The second play I know exactly what your talking about. Deon was signaling over for somebody they snapped it and threw it out to him nobody touched him for ten yards. Before the snap I was yelling at everybody with me what was gonna happen before the play even happened cause nobody was on him
Click to expand...

Yep same here.

Here's that play:


View attachment 25772
Click to expand...

According to corch macho, theres nothing wrong with this alignment. No wonder this guy thought that corch D was some kind of defensive genius.
 
luke137 said:
Coach Macho said:
See, I don't mind if people are gonna dog the pre-snap alignments but atleast know WTF you're talkin about.

The first play in question...

Burns HAS to be on the TE side. We're playing zone. Who do you think is covering the TE if he goes vertical? Also, what if they run toss? The problem is yall don't know the difference between zone and man. In zone, LB's match up with WR's all the time. Burn is either playing Cover-2, in which case he has the flats, or Cover-3 where he has the TE releasing vertical. The Linebacker that's lined up on the #2 is covering flats. Just cause he's got a ******' WR across from him doesn't mean he's playing man on him. SMH


Honestly, not a single alignment (screen shot) in this thread is wrong. They're all pretty standard.
Click to expand...

If the opponent was 50-50 run, pass I'd agree with you. But with Nebraska that isn't the case. We already knew Ameer was going to get 30+ touches.
Click to expand...

What exactly are you disagreeing with?
 
weownfsu said:
weownfsu said:
imlive365 said:
The second play I know exactly what your talking about. Deon was signaling over for somebody they snapped it and threw it out to him nobody touched him for ten yards. Before the snap I was yelling at everybody with me what was gonna happen before the play even happened cause nobody was on him
Click to expand...

Yep same here.

Here's that play:


View attachment 25772
Click to expand...

According to corch macho, theres nothing wrong with this alignment. No wonder this guy thought that corch D was some kind of defensive genius.
Click to expand...


I didn't say anything about this play, you dumb *****.
 
Advertisement
weownfsu said:
OK, so riddle me this: why is the OLB on top of PErryman in the pic lined up where he is? Why he isn't he lined up closer to the WR's so he can make a play on the slot guy if it's a quick pass?
Click to expand...

Drrrr...

Cause he's the edge player and he's blitzing.

Again, you don't know WTF you're looking at. Teams like up this way against trips all the time.
 
Coach Macho said:
See, I don't mind if people are gonna dog the pre-snap alignments but atleast know WTF you're talkin about.

The first play in question...

Burns HAS to be on the TE side. We're playing zone. Who do you think is covering the TE if he goes vertical? Also, what if they run toss? The problem is yall don't know the difference between zone and man. In zone, LB's match up with WR's all the time. Burn is either playing Cover-2, in which case he has the flats, or Cover-3 where he has the TE releasing vertical. The Linebacker that's lined up on the #2 is covering flats. Just cause he's got a ****in' WR across from him doesn't mean he's playing man on him. SMH


Honestly, not a single alignment (screen shot) in this thread is wrong.[/B] They're all pretty standard.
Click to expand...


So when you said not a single alignment in this thread was wrong, you weren't talking about one of the alignments in this thread?

Stick to telling us about the genius of Dorito, not reading.
 
Coach Macho said:
weownfsu said:
OK, so riddle me this: why is the OLB on top of PErryman in the pic lined up where he is? Why he isn't he lined up closer to the WR's so he can make a play on the slot guy if it's a quick pass?
Click to expand...

Drrrr...

Cause he's the edge player and he's blitzing.

Again, you don't know WTF you're looking at. Teams like up this way against trips all the time.
Click to expand...

You dumbass, I'm talking about the LB next to Perryman that isn't lined up on the edge. Why is he towards the middle of the field and not towards the 3 WR's so that he'd be in a good position to clean up any short passes?

No wonder you coach ****** HS ball for a living. Jesus.
 
Lets try a different tact Wildcat. Tell us why what we run is wrong and how we tried to stop the run last night was the wrong scheme.

What would you have done differently?
 
Back
Top