You are the only person who veers back and forth between arguing for ACTUAL on-campus home games (which are not neutral site) and then claiming that somehow the championship is not "decided on the field" due to the regionality of 90% of all bowl sites.
Are the Bucs an illegitimate Super Bowl winner because the game was played in Tampa? Is the NCAA Tournament a bogus way to crown a champion because the PRE-SET regional locations will, at some point, probably give a "geographic advantage" to some teams over other teams?
Oh, and while we're at it, should the University of Miami give back any national championships that were awarded after Orange Bowl wins?
Your arguments are trash. That's not a personal attack. That's just reality.
You somehow claim that giving higher seeds a home field advantage is the only way to "settle it on the field". But then you complain about "northern teams" losing their "geographic advantages" if they have to play in the south in NFL stadiums.
But you fail to acknowledge that over 100 years of college football have played the vast majority of bowl games (and thus the games that decided national championships) in warm-weather climates. And you fail to acknowledge that NOTHING about those post-season games has changed. Even worse, you act like these playoff games (and apparently the seedings) would be manipulated SOLELY to have, say, LSU play in the Sugar Bowl for one game (who knows which one, as there are three rounds, even though the first round is currently proposed to be played on campus).
Just ridiculous.