- Joined
- Jul 24, 2012
- Messages
- 24,507
I mean addict is in his name. He needs treatment. This is a call for help.
I have to say, I respect the commitment to the bit. One way we might be able to overcome penalties and a few passing mistakes is by being more effective in other areas of the game.I said the running game didn't cause that loss. Quit bringing up previous games. We literally, without exaggeration, lost on Saturday because of penalties and incompetence in completing passes.
You could do a draw or low risk play and see how it goes so it's not complaining to complain
You don’t think @htownkidd ’s post is intelligently arrived at? It’s true:See above. It was described as an intelligent post.
It’s Jagr man. I know better than to jump in here but I felt like some exercise. Now I’m good I’ve had enough. I could never keep pace with him, Cali or TOC. Those guys are relentless and know no hill they can’t climb and defend.I have to say, I respect the commitment to the bit. One way we might be able to overcome penalties and a few passing mistakes is by being more effective in other areas of the game.
We are running the ball as effectively as Temple with multiple NFL offensive linemen and you are completely unwilling to admit that is a concern.
We were pass blocking well. Spread the lanes and attack. You’d be amazed at how well that works for Cignetti.Yes, the whole offensive operation is ****, which is why it's so funny that people think we lost the game because we didn't try to go 40 yards in 25 seconds with no running game and a QB who throws interceptions.
We were pass blocking well. Spread the lanes and attack. You’d be amazed at how well that works for Cignetti.
Lol not trying to win it in regulation? Playing not to lose… or win for that matter?And that is such a minuscule thing to focus on in that disaster of a game.
I'm not a "butch da gawd" guy like some. But even back then we knew the team was missing 50 scholarships, the offense was a pretty big change that would take time, and the discipline had to be cleaned up from Coach E's tenure.Feels like Butch before we all loved him
No. They run that system at times, until they clam up when Mario gets scared and go into bunch set mode. They can run it.If you want to run a different system, that would require changing things in practice. Not drawing up plays on a whiteboard with 25 seconds left.
With all the things that went wrong to cause us to lose, yes, that is the most random and minor thing to post about for four days (and counting).Lol not trying to win it in regulation? Playing not to lose… or win for that matter?
No. They run that system at times, until they clam up when Mario gets scared and go into bunch set mode. They can run it.
Im talking about coaching decisions. I think the refs cost us the game in the end though I don’t think we should have been in a dogfight to begin with.With all the things that went wrong to cause us to lose, yes, that is the most random and minor thing to post about for four days (and counting).
Welp, Mario chose Beck. Mario chose to come back with Emory as first man up after that bowl game last year. You win though.We had good pass protection on all of the interceptions and dropped passes and OL penalties as well.
Welp, Mario chose Beck. Mario chose to come back with Emory as first man up after that bowl game last year. You win though.
You can’t stop Jagr, you can only hope to contain him.
Now that's a curious question. And that Harbaugh stuff was very public. Then again it is a public school vs. a private school.I remember during Harbaugh's tenure at Michigan he took a pay cut. Would Mario do the same?
So we have thousands of posts screaming about how bad the running game is.....
.....but we probably would have won if we had just tried a draw.