Why do we think we need a WR1?

[troyskiles]

I would rather see 4-5 guys or more, just go out and perform like WR1. If they all (or most) are leaders, then all they have to do is catch the ball and they can all be WR1.
Do we need a WR1 to be the best and the other can be average? **** no! We want them ALL to be above average. Yardage will dictate the man, but in this day and age, we need 5 above average WR.
Am I off base here, because I think we have 5 above average receivers. Just think if 5 of them get 500 yards a piece. Not bad. and hard to defend And we have the TE's!!!
I think our WR room is ballin. I want all of them to get the rock equally. This will make us better. How can it not? I do not think we lack leadership in that room, just production.
Please stop with the we need a WR1 to step up, why? Help me understand.
Thanks, just been drinking the Kool-Aid lately. Go motherfvcking CANES!!!!

 

[Rellyrell]

 

[Memnon]

 

[WeBallinBoyz]

 

[Southcane]

I don't know about WR1. I want 2-3 top notch hard to defend WR's.
The ones who are threats to take it to the house every time they catch the ball.

 

[skyman]

Just been drinking the Kool-Aid late. I would rather see 4-5 guys or more, just go out and perform like WR1. If they all (or most) are leaders, then all they have to do is catch the ball and they can all be WR1.
Do we need a WR1 to be the best and the other can be average? **** no! We want them ALL to be above average. Yardage will dictate the man, but in this day and age, we need 5 above average WR.
Am I off base here, because I think we have 5 above average receivers. Just think if 5 of them get 500 yards a piece. Not bad. and hard to defend And we have the TE's!!!
I think our WR room is ballin. I want all of them to get the rock equally. This will make us better. How can it not? I do not think we lack leadership in that room, just production.
Please stop with the we need a WR1 to step up, why? Help me understand.
Thanks, Go motherfvcking CANES!!!!

If you can edit the post and move the "drinking the Kool-Aid lately" line towards the top of post it will help others save time and understand what we dealing with, rock on bro..

 

[SCarolina Ibis]

A #1 WR does a lot more for an offense than what their stats tell u. They aren't just go to guys. They draw the attention of the defense, opening things up for the other guys. They can create one on one opportunities for other WRs just by being on the field.

 

[IndayArtHauz]

 

[Southcane]

I like "who needs" game.
My favorite is Tina Turner "who needs a heart when a heart can be broken"

 

[SinisterCane]

Any offense thats worth a damm has a WR1 to that can takeover a game and make crucial plays. We have a bunch of 3s and 4s and so far 2 out of 3 portal WRs have come in and snatched that WR1

Take the Greentree WRs with a grain of salt

 

[BostonCanes47]

You need a guy who the defense fears and rolls coverages, brackets (double coverage) to. If you don’t have that alpha dog it allows the defense to be more aggressive with their coverages and blitz packages.

Same goes for having a dominant corner. If you have a corner who can take away a third of the field, it gives the defensive coordinator way more flexibility in their game planning and calling.

 

[amanan28]

A WR1 has the ability to break the game open at any point of the game.

We don’t have any difference makers at the position rn just a bunch of bodies

 

[jnf2257]

“Why do we need a WR1?”

“I’d like us to have 4 WR1s!”

Can’t make this up haha

 

[E1k]

Thanks, just been drinking the Kool-Aid lately.

This is all we needed to know

 

[JamesQuall]

I would rather see 4-5 guys or more, just go out and perform like WR1. If they all (or most) are leaders, then all they have to do is catch the ball and they can all be WR1.
Do we need a WR1 to be the best and the other can be average? **** no! We want them ALL to be above average. Yardage will dictate the man, but in this day and age, we need 5 above average WR.
Am I off base here, because I think we have 5 above average receivers. Just think if 5 of them get 500 yards a piece. Not bad. and hard to defend And we have the TE's!!!
I think our WR room is ballin. I want all of them to get the rock equally. This will make us better. How can it not? I do not think we lack leadership in that room, just production.
Please stop with the we need a WR1 to step up, why? Help me understand.
Thanks, just been drinking the Kool-Aid lately. Go motherfvcking CANES!!!!

Thanks for the reminder it's time to start drinking it's waaay past 5.

 

[cway313]

I would rather see 4-5 guys or more, just go out and perform like WR1. If they all (or most) are leaders, then all they have to do is catch the ball and they can all be WR1.
Do we need a WR1 to be the best and the other can be average? **** no! We want them ALL to be above average. Yardage will dictate the man, but in this day and age, we need 5 above average WR.
Am I off base here, because I think we have 5 above average receivers. Just think if 5 of them get 500 yards a piece. Not bad. and hard to defend And we have the TE's!!!
I think our WR room is ballin. I want all of them to get the rock equally. This will make us better. How can it not? I do not think we lack leadership in that room, just production.
Please stop with the we need a WR1 to step up, why? Help me understand.
Thanks, just been drinking the Kool-Aid lately. Go motherfvcking CANES!!!!

I hate @Andrew for taking away my opportunity to dumbvote this. @RVACane this is what CIS "does to people"

 

[CaliforniaCanes]

Jacolby George needs to be that guy.

 

[troyskiles]

What LC El?

 

[troyskiles]

If you can edit the post and move the "drinking the Kool-Aid lately" line towards the top of post it will help others save time and understand what we dealing with, rock on bro..

I'll try harder next time. []_[]!

 

[troyskiles]

A WR1 has the ability to break the game open at any point of the game.

We don’t have any difference makers at the position rn just a bunch of bodies

Nice try, we have a ton of talent, just hasn't been brought out of them yet.