D_G87
Sophomore
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2014
- Messages
- 2,139
Really good post. That Goal Line picture vs GTECH is laughable.
Like some have posted, Louisville is a good example. Here's what they do:
![]()
Notice the LB depth and DB's on 3rd and 8. This play resulted in an INT in the endzone.
![]()
Part 1. Again, look at the hats in the box and the DB's
![]()
Part 2. DT disrupted the pitch lane resulting in another turnover.
Now, here's what we do
![]()
![]()
The results:
We have given up 22 TD's, 328 yards per game and 171 points.
They have given up 9 TD's, 230 yards per game and 99 points.
NO ONE HAS REACHED 300 YARDS IN A GAME AGAINST THEM THIS YEAR. THEY HELD CLEMSON TO 229 YARDS.
![]()
THE CLOUD/TALENT/TOO COMPLEX CRAP:
Everyone knows this is Year 4 of running a 3-4 (or whatever it is) for us and Year 1 for Louisville. Grantham used the existing 4-3 personnel at Louisville. We have recruited and handpicked the players we wanted to run the system for 4 years.
-We have two 5 Stars, seven 4 Stars and five 3 Stars in heavy rotation along with Fentress (NR).
-They have zero 5 Stars, two 4 Stars (both from Miami, FL) and nine 3 Stars (5 from Florida).
Conclusion: Less time to implement, less talent, night and day results on the field. Why?