What I'm looking for on Friday statistically

The way you slow down a fast & unorthodox Offense like Wake's, it take the ball from them.

It forces their OC to go away from the gameplan & start calling their sequences more cautiously.

Mario is very familiar with Jake ****ert from when he was at Wash ST, he also has history with Rob Ezell from the Bama days. That should/could be a caveat to give Dawson & Heatherman some pretty good psychological insight into their tendencies as play callers.

If we win the turnover battle on Friday I don’t think it’s possible for the game to even be close, nevermind lose.

We haven’t lost a game where we had a plus turnover margin since Louisville in 2023.

All 3 losses in 2024 and 2025 we were even or negative in the turnover battle.

As a matter of fact, if you want to get really crazy, we are 23-6 in the last 2 years (2024 and 2025, not counting this year yet)

In the 26 wins, we are +21 turnovers.
In the 6 losses, we are -9 turnovers.

Don’t lose the turnover battle and we don’t lose the game. Been that way for over 2 seasons now.
 
When we have the football:

- 40+ points -- Only 2 teams averaged 40+ last year (4 if you round up and include Indiana and Utah at 39.5). Our team total is right at about 38. Wake is bad on defense. We need to drop 40 on them, period.
- 3.4+ points per drive -- Mario has talked several times about how the college game is seeing fewer possessions per game compared to prior years. The clock rules have a lot to do with that, but he's expanded on it talking about the need for explosives. This year, Miami has 7 plays of 40+ yards. Last year, in 16 games, we had 14. Explosive plays lead to points, and in games where possessions are limited, you need to score points every drive. 3.4 points per drive is easily a Top 5 mark in the country, I want it on Friday
- 7.0+ yards per play -- A favorite of Shannon Dawson's, in 2024 we led the country with 7.56 yards per play. If this is the best offense in America, and it might be, you go get 7.0+ per play against Wake Forest
- 15 plays of 10+ yards, 6 plays of 20+ yards, 3 plays of 30+ yards. -- Last year, Miami averaged 13.4 plays of 10+ yards, but only 4 plays of 20+ yards, and less than 2 plays of 30+ yards per game. Not good enough. We need to be more explosive.
- Snapping the ball no more than 25 seconds apart -- this one can be skewed if we get up late, but we are WAY too slow on offense. We need to increase the number of plays, and increase the pace. 25 seconds between plays ranked 39th fastest last year, so I'm not looking for some breakneck fast-paced operation, but Miami was 129th in pace last year. Even with Cam in 2024, we were 77th. We have to get much faster.

Our starters haven't played a full 3 quarters yet, and most games they won't need to.

The pace was a pleasant improvement last game. There was definitely some urgency and, as long as we continue to execute at a high level, I expect we'll continue to play fast. Our ceiling as a team will depend on OL development and how fast we can operate this season.
 
I think a "quicker pace" has just become the norm for offenses and people confuse "more plays" with a Chip Kelly-esque leap when he really first brought it on tbe scene.

"More snaps" = routine game plan today

I still believe though,a brutal tuff n fyzical ground game keeps the other O (and their tempo) off the field...that becomes a multi-pronged O + D strategy in one.
 
We start slow on defense for whatever reason. Heatherman likes to play off and feel you out and then try to bow up in the redzone. Then he makes halftime adjustments and it’s over.

So expect them to march down the field on their first drive and get a fg or td and have 10 points at the half. Should be 21/24 - 10 at half and final score 45 - 17.

We were #4 in the country in 1st quarter scoring defense last season, at 2.2 points per 1Q allowed.

We were #3 in the country in 1st half scoring defense last season.

Pretty sure we gave up 3 TDs in the first quarter the entire season. 16 games.
Interesting. Felt like we got better as the game went on. So perhaps we’ll give up some yards and a couple of first downs but that’s it
 
The defense has heard all the negativity and noise. I think they’re going to come out with a fire under their *** and dominate. This is the perfect opportunity for Mario to prove he’s taken the next step and assert his dominance in the conference once and for all.
People need to relax on the D. Teams have been getting the ball out quick to avoid QB sacks and pressure. I'm just glad we aren't blitzing to get there when we won't get there anyway. We know teams are getting it out quick, and when that happens it shortens the area where they can throw the ball. Our D is doing just fine, giving up only 6 points in two games.
 
We start slow on defense for whatever reason. Heatherman likes to play off and feel you out and then try to bow up in the redzone. Then he makes halftime adjustments and it’s over.

So expect them to march down the field on their first drive and get a fg or td and have 10 points at the half. Should be 21/24 - 10 at half and final score 45 - 17.
I think secretly we have a deal with the broadcasters of our games, if that game is 24-10 at the half, imagine the eyeballs that will get pulled in, lol!
 
I think the bottom line is, especially based on our competition, the defense has looked underwhelming. Unfortunately, they’re being measured against last year’s defense and the havoc they were able to cause.
The season is shaping up very oddly at this point.
Wakes QB is nicked up, Central Michigan is not going to provide much of a test. Clemson just replaced their quarterback. And FSU is well… FSU.
Point is, it doesn’t look like we’re going to see an offense with a lot of potential until the end of the season.
 
I think the bottom line is, especially based on our competition, the defense has looked underwhelming. Unfortunately, they’re being measured against last year’s defense and the havoc they were able to cause.
The season is shaping up very oddly at this point.
Wakes QB is nicked up, Central Michigan is not going to provide much of a test. Clemson just replaced their quarterback. And FSU is well… FSU.
Point is, it doesn’t look like we’re going to see an offense with a lot of potential until the end of the season.
It rarely works out like that, though. Usually some team will have a breakthrough game. Wake can score I just don’t think they can score more than 20-25 points on us and I don’t think they have a chance to keep us under 25 points
 
I get what you’re saying, but I look at teams that try the high-tempo thing and are there really any that were dominant championship teams? Sure they’re fun and flashy, but if you run into a team that can stop you, all you’re doing is speeding up putting your defense back on the field with little rest, which hurts your overall team. I love this offense so far. It’s fun but it’s still grounded and Mensah is completing 90% of throws. Obviously that won’t hold for the season, but it’s an absolute dagger to defensive morale and confidence when you systematically pick them apart.

I prefer to use tempo strategically to catch defenses off guard. Suddenly go fast and they start wondering if they have time to sub and what defense to run.

I’m not saying go berserk. We don’t need to be Alex Golesh. But instead of 130th in the country, which se were last year, can we get to 50th? We have a massive athletic advantage, the more plays you run, the more you can exploit that advantage.

We averaged just under 63 offensive snaps per game last season. That's well below average for college football. To @OrangeBowlMagic's point, we aren't advocating for a "high tempo" offense, but a better pace to increase snap count more consistent with the modern trend. Looking at this team, it's in our best interest to average something like 70-72 snaps per game (about average). If we can average ~7.0 yards per play with this offense (I think we can; we average ~7.4 with Cam), that translates to 49-63 extra yards per game. And those extra yards equate to extra points.
 
Add this to the list. This is a very concerning chart. Now, let’s be real, it’s a super small sample; and the level of competition is all over the place for various teams. So in Week 2, it is what it is. But in Week 6-7, we gotta be out of this area.

I would bet you every single team that’s won a national championship in the last 20 years was in the upper left quadrant. You have to generate pressure and you have to protect the passer. This is nowhere near good enough. Very interested to see how this goes from here.

View attachment 372846

My biggest knock currently. As you stated, only 2 games so not ringing the alarm or anything but underwhelmed with pass rush thus far considering what we have there and who we have faced. Let’s see where we are on this after these next 2 games heading into Clemson.
 
We averaged just under 63 offensive snaps per game last season. That's well below average for college football. To @OrangeBowlMagic's point, we aren't advocating for a "high tempo" offense, but a better pace to increase snap count more consistent with the modern trend. Looking at this team, it's in our best interest to average something like 70-72 snaps per game (about average). If we can average ~7.0 yards per play with this offense (I think we can; we average ~7.4 with Cam), that translates to 49-63 extra yards per game. And those extra yards equate to extra points.
O average yds per play is 15 right now.

Granted skewed due to competition level, but holy 1st downs Batman.
 
Points allowed most important defensive stat imo. 6 allowed in 2 games underwhelming?

Obviously not.

But there are underlying metrics that have my attention that we need to improve. And we haven’t played 2 games. We played 1 game and a scrimmage against a high school team. Literally. But yes, 6 points per game is obviously great. However, I need to see more pressure on the quarterback. Against Stanford and the high school, we have 6 TFLs. We’ve forced 0 turnovers. So yes, 6 points is great. But I’m not even looking at Stanford and Wake and the rest of the ACC. If we’re even challenged in more than 1 ACC game, I’ll be floored. I’m trying to win a natty.

I’ll be more focused on the defense than the offense this week. I know what I have on offense. A disgusting wagon who is gonna make every DC we play bite the curb. Can we create havoc on defense that’s commensurate?
 
I have concerns about the defense, I just hope I’m wrong.
And yes, I know the stats from last week.

I’ll say this much though if their, Wakes , pass defense doesn’t play significantly better they’re cooked.
Ahmmon did a good breakdown.. Lots of cover 3. Seams wide open. Unless our OL communication is horrible I think the offense will roll.
 
Underrated post.

I know people have PTSD from D’Onofrio’s “bend and break” system but good defenses make opponents execute over and over to score. Explosive plays mean everything in college football and nothing breaks a defense worse than giving up a 60 yard play because you got overly aggressive trying to stop a three yard gain.

Before some idiot quotes me and says “are you supposed to let teams just move up and down the field?” Of course not. It’s just the idea that if you’re faced with the decision of “should I risk giving up the long play to make a play that saves my defense three yards?” You protect against the big play and you live to fight another down.

College offenses, even the good ones, struggle to consistently move the ball by executing perfectly for ten+ plays. Even if they manage to move the ball between the 20’s, many offenses stall in the red zone where the defense doesn’t have to defend against the deep pass at all. Make your opponent have to execute multiple plays in a row and if they manage to do that, hold them to a field goal attempt.
D'oritos's defenses bent AND broke. We just didn't have the horses, and were insistent on playing 3-4 without a true nose. One season our starting safeties were AJ Highsmith and Kacy Rodgers. Seriously.
 
Back
Top