What I'm looking for on Friday statistically

I just feel like this defense does better against teams that are trying to beat it. When teams come out ****y thinking they are just gonna run thier ish and we have to stop them they get their **** pushed in more often than not.

But...

If a team comes out and takes what the D is designed to give them then they have to be patient and happy with small gains, stay on schedule, play mistake free, and hope one of our elite talents don't make some sort of play to upset even the easy stuff we are giving them.

This can be frustrating to watch as a fan because it looks like we are getting beat out there but it's really just a bet that the opposing team can't stay perfect and won't stay "boring" to quote Dawson. It's really hard to beat teams 5 yards at a time all game without making mistakes.
Underrated post.

I know people have PTSD from D’Onofrio’s “bend and break” system but good defenses make opponents execute over and over to score. Explosive plays mean everything in college football and nothing breaks a defense worse than giving up a 60 yard play because you got overly aggressive trying to stop a three yard gain.

Before some idiot quotes me and says “are you supposed to let teams just move up and down the field?” Of course not. It’s just the idea that if you’re faced with the decision of “should I risk giving up the long play to make a play that saves my defense three yards?” You protect against the big play and you live to fight another down.

College offenses, even the good ones, struggle to consistently move the ball by executing perfectly for ten+ plays. Even if they manage to move the ball between the 20’s, many offenses stall in the red zone where the defense doesn’t have to defend against the deep pass at all. Make your opponent have to execute multiple plays in a row and if they manage to do that, hold them to a field goal attempt.
 
Add this to the list. This is a very concerning chart. Now, let’s be real, it’s a super small sample; and the level of competition is all over the place for various teams. So in Week 2, it is what it is. But in Week 6-7, we gotta be out of this area.

I would bet you every single team that’s won a national championship in the last 20 years was in the upper left quadrant. You have to generate pressure and you have to protect the passer. This is nowhere near good enough. Very interested to see how this goes from here.

5DD26394-7201-4486-9BE5-1B8A7DD15701.png
 
I have no concern on offense or the offensive line, you should be able to scheme an offense no matter what in college.

Defense I am very skeptical, looking for the defense to prove me wrong.
I have concerns about the defense, I just hope I’m wrong.
And yes, I know the stats from last week.

I’ll say this much though if their, Wakes , pass defense doesn’t play significantly better they’re cooked.
 
That's a lot of information & I appreciate the thought you always put into your posts.

For me, without much consideration, the only number that matters to me is 40+ every game. I expect us to score 40-45 & them around 20 max. If they score more, I'm gonna feel some type of way about that.
 
I know, just win. We got it.

But how you win, and what you do when you win, can give us some clues about the overall trajectory and ceiling of a team. I think we're going to win a national championship this year, and teams have scares all the time, but I don't expect Wake to even look like they belong on the same field with us, at least when we have the ball.

So what am I looking for from a statistical standpoint on Friday night that will make me encouraged we are truly on our way to being one of the very best teams in America?

When we have the football:

- 40+ points -- Only 2 teams averaged 40+ last year (4 if you round up and include Indiana and Utah at 39.5). Our team total is right at about 38. Wake is bad on defense. We need to drop 40 on them, period.
- 3.4+ points per drive -- Mario has talked several times about how the college game is seeing fewer possessions per game compared to prior years. The clock rules have a lot to do with that, but he's expanded on it talking about the need for explosives. This year, Miami has 7 plays of 40+ yards. Last year, in 16 games, we had 14. Explosive plays lead to points, and in games where possessions are limited, you need to score points every drive. 3.4 points per drive is easily a Top 5 mark in the country, I want it on Friday
- 7.0+ yards per play -- A favorite of Shannon Dawson's, in 2024 we led the country with 7.56 yards per play. If this is the best offense in America, and it might be, you go get 7.0+ per play against Wake Forest
- 15 plays of 10+ yards, 6 plays of 20+ yards, 3 plays of 30+ yards. -- Last year, Miami averaged 13.4 plays of 10+ yards, but only 4 plays of 20+ yards, and less than 2 plays of 30+ yards per game. Not good enough. We need to be more explosive.
- Snapping the ball no more than 25 seconds apart -- this one can be skewed if we get up late, but we are WAY too slow on offense. We need to increase the number of plays, and increase the pace. 25 seconds between plays ranked 39th fastest last year, so I'm not looking for some breakneck fast-paced operation, but Miami was 129th in pace last year. Even with Cam in 2024, we were 77th. We have to get much faster.

When Wake has the ball:

- 17 points, max -- Again, context. If we give them a pick six, or some turnover deep, or they have 13 and score a TD with 5 seconds left against walk-ons when its 55-13, then I'll allow it. But our defense cannot allow more than 17 "real" points.
- Less than 4 yards per carry -- Wake has ran it well in their 2 games, they are 18th in the country in yards per carry, at 5.26. They are getting 194 yards per game on the ground. We held Stanford to 3.39, and remember QB sacks are rushing attempts in college football. So we got 0 sacks, meaning that's a true rushing number, 3.39 YPC. It's not skewed because we sacked the quarterback. We need to hold Wake under 4, and make them throw the ball from behind the sticks.
- Less than 55% completions -- This is a big one, so far this year, Wake is completing only 61% of their passes, good for 78th in America. We know our corners are banged up, we also think we'll have a lead in this game and be playing from ahead. So, if they have to throw it 40 times, can we shut it down to the tune of 55% completions? If we do, and hold them under 4 yards a carry, we win by 30.
- 1.50 points per drive or less -- That number usually ranks you about 15th nationally. If we're going to have a national championship defense, we hold Wake Forest to a number that equates to 15th nationally
- 5.0 Yards per play or less -- Again, a number that's about 20th nationally, year over year. I'm not expecting the 85 bears here, but I will feel very good about our defense if we can hold them under 5 a play. Obviously way early in the season, but Wake is 15th right now in yards per play. They got 8.22 against Akron, and 6.04 last week against Purdue. No reason to think we can't be a yard better than Purdue was.

Overall, Wake looks better on offense than they are on defense. I don't think a team like that has much of a chance against us. You're not going to beat us being one-dimensional, and if you do, I think the team who plays us close is one with an elite defense that can at least hold us in check, and a decent offense that can keep a game close. I just don't see being challenged much by a team that ranks 45th in yards per play allowed, and those 2 games were against Akron and Purdue's offenses.

I'll come back on Saturday and check in on how well we hit these, but I want to see Miami take their crowd out very early, let's do exactly what we did against Stanford and score 2 TDs in the first quarter, and drop 40+ on these dudes. They have given up 80% (!!!!!) completions in their first 2 games. EIGHTY. Akron went 28/33 and Purdue went 32/42. Mensah should be having target practice out there.
Miami has a painful habit of making opposing QBs look lime Heisman locks...

Run D should be OK at worst...key is what happens against the Deacs air attack...

Demon Ds probably beat Stanford by at least 10-14 pts...
We start slow on defense for whatever reason. Heatherman likes to play off and feel you out and then try to bow up in the redzone. Then he makes halftime adjustments and it’s over.

So expect them to march down the field on their first drive and get a fg or td and have 10 points at the half. Should be 21/24 - 10 at half and final score 45 - 17.
 
Underrated post.

I know people have PTSD from D’Onofrio’s “bend and break” system but good defenses make opponents execute over and over to score. Explosive plays mean everything in college football and nothing breaks a defense worse than giving up a 60 yard play because you got overly aggressive trying to stop a three yard gain.

Before some idiot quotes me and says “are you supposed to let teams just move up and down the field?” Of course not. It’s just the idea that if you’re faced with the decision of “should I risk giving up the long play to make a play that saves my defense three yards?” You protect against the big play and you live to fight another down.

College offenses, even the good ones, struggle to consistently move the ball by executing perfectly for ten+ plays. Even if they manage to move the ball between the 20’s, many offenses stall in the red zone where the defense doesn’t have to defend against the deep pass at all. Make your opponent have to execute multiple plays in a row and if they manage to do that, hold them to a field goal attempt.

To these points, defensive RZ success rate is what I’ll be looking at on Friday.
Will the final score be 41-16 or 41-28?
 
I just feel like this defense does better against teams that are trying to beat it. When teams come out ****y thinking they are just gonna run thier ish and we have to stop them they get their **** pushed in more often than not.

But...

If a team comes out and takes what the D is designed to give them then they have to be patient and happy with small gains, stay on schedule, play mistake free, and hope one of our elite talents don't make some sort of play to upset even the easy stuff we are giving them.

This can be frustrating to watch as a fan because it looks like we are getting beat out there but it's really just a bet that the opposing team can't stay perfect and won't stay "boring" to quote Dawson. It's really hard to beat teams 5 yards at a time all game without making mistakes.
Agreed and I think that’s affecting some of the sack numbers because most pass plays are quick throws or they move the pocket.
 
We start slow on defense for whatever reason. Heatherman likes to play off and feel you out and then try to bow up in the redzone. Then he makes halftime adjustments and it’s over.

So expect them to march down the field on their first drive and get a fg or td and have 10 points at the half. Should be 21/24 - 10 at half and final score 45 - 17.

We were #4 in the country in 1st quarter scoring defense last season, at 2.2 points per 1Q allowed.

We were #3 in the country in 1st half scoring defense last season.

Pretty sure we gave up 3 TDs in the first quarter the entire season. 16 games.
 
Last edited:
To the naked eye our pace is vastly improved over last year. What are the metrics so far?

Slow. But the same size is very little, we've only played 1 FBS game, and we were up massively.

But in 2025, we averaged 29.7 seconds between plays. That ranked 129th in the country. We also averaged 66.4 plays per game.

Through a whopping 1 game in 2026, we are averaging 29.0 seconds between plays. Ranks 107th. And we ran 67 plays against Stanford.

So.....pretty much the same. It needs to be a lot faster.
I don’t care about pace when we’re as efficient as we’ve been. I’ll take the extra 4 seconds per play if it’s as successful as our plays have been this year. If every drive ends in 7, that takes way more out of a defense than a faster offense.
 
That should be a given by the fact starters are simply more proficient all around at running within the O scheme

What could hould them back from going lightspeed is too much success. Harder to run more plays when you are team averaging 15+ypc on each throw.
The other part about that with pace… it puts a lot on your defense when you are averaging 15ypc on throws on top of playing with pace. Cause they’re not getting much rest which is why if we continue offensively playing so efficiently. I think Mario has been more concerned of that than others
 
I don’t care about pace when we’re as efficient as we’ve been. I’ll take the extra 4 seconds per play if it’s as successful as our plays have been this year. If every drive ends in 7, that takes way more out of a defense than a faster offense.

But that’s selling yourself short. If you’re efficient on a per play basis, and obviously we have been through 2 games against massively overmatched opponents, then the goal should be to run MORE plays. Not being cool with running less.

I understand what you’re saying, but it’s an archaic way of thinking. If you want to argue going faster would make us less efficient, then that’s a discussion. But saying you’re cool with going slow as long as we score is very flawed logic. If I get 8 yards every time I snap it, I want to snap it 100 times if I can. It’s kind of why Steph Curry is an all-time great. If I shoot 50% on threes, and you shoot 70% on twos, and we take the same amount of shots, who’s gonna win?

At 10 shots each, I win 15-14.

But at 50 shots each, I win 75-70.

The margin increases the more volume increases. Same theory here. Be efficient, but have high volume. That’s how you make the babies.
 
I don’t care about pace when we’re as efficient as we’ve been. I’ll take the extra 4 seconds per play if it’s as successful as our plays have been this year. If every drive ends in 7, that takes way more out of a defense than a faster offense.

But that’s selling yourself short. If you’re efficient on a per play basis, and obviously we have been through 2 games against massively overmatched opponents, then the goal should be to run MORE plays. Not being cool with running less.

I understand what you’re saying, but it’s an archaic way of thinking. If you want to argue going faster would make us less efficient, then that’s a discussion. But saying you’re cool with going slow as long as we score is very flawed logic. If I get 8 yards every time I snap it, I want to snap it 100 times if I can. It’s kind of why Steph Curry is an all-time great. If I shoot 50% on threes, and you shoot 70% on twos, and we take the same amount of shots, who’s gonna win?

At 10 shots each, I win 15-14.

But at 50 shots each, I win 75-70.

The margin increases the more volume increases. Same theory here. Be efficient, but have high volume. That’s how you make the babies.
I get what you’re saying, but I look at teams that try the high-tempo thing and are there really any that were dominant championship teams? Sure they’re fun and flashy, but if you run into a team that can stop you, all you’re doing is speeding up putting your defense back on the field with little rest, which hurts your overall team. I love this offense so far. It’s fun but it’s still grounded and Mensah is completing 90% of throws. Obviously that won’t hold for the season, but it’s an absolute dagger to defensive morale and confidence when you systematically pick them apart.

I prefer to use tempo strategically to catch defenses off guard. Suddenly go fast and they start wondering if they have time to sub and what defense to run.
 
I get what you’re saying, but I look at teams that try the high-tempo thing and are there really any that were dominant championship teams?
My counter argument to this has always been, how many teams have ever gone high tempo that weren’t playing at a massive talent disadvantage against championship level teams? Teams have used tempo to overcome a talent disadvantage, what’s to say teams having a talent advantage wouldn’t further widen the gap by utilizing it.

It’s a really similar conversation to spread offenses prior to SEC teams adapting to modern football. It was always “that doesn’t win championships” until it did.
 
I get what you’re saying, but I look at teams that try the high-tempo thing and are there really any that were dominant championship teams? Sure they’re fun and flashy, but if you run into a team that can stop you, all you’re doing is speeding up putting your defense back on the field with little rest, which hurts your overall team. I love this offense so far. It’s fun but it’s still grounded and Mensah is completing 90% of throws. Obviously that won’t hold for the season, but it’s an absolute dagger to defensive morale and confidence when you systematically pick them apart.

I prefer to use tempo strategically to catch defenses off guard. Suddenly go fast and they start wondering if they have time to sub and what defense to run.

I’m not saying go berserk. We don’t need to be Alex Golesh. But instead of 130th in the country, which se were last year, can we get to 50th? We have a massive athletic advantage, the more plays you run, the more you can exploit that advantage.
 
Underrated post.

I know people have PTSD from D’Onofrio’s “bend and break” system but good defenses make opponents execute over and over to score. Explosive plays mean everything in college football and nothing breaks a defense worse than giving up a 60 yard play because you got overly aggressive trying to stop a three yard gain.

Before some idiot quotes me and says “are you supposed to let teams just move up and down the field?” Of course not. It’s just the idea that if you’re faced with the decision of “should I risk giving up the long play to make a play that saves my defense three yards?” You protect against the big play and you live to fight another down.

College offenses, even the good ones, struggle to consistently move the ball by executing perfectly for ten+ plays. Even if they manage to move the ball between the 20’s, many offenses stall in the red zone where the defense doesn’t have to defend against the deep pass at all. Make your opponent have to execute multiple plays in a row and if they manage to do that, hold them to a field goal attempt.
Slam the QB on his head and kill him.
 
- Turnovers.

We need to force some turnovers to kill a few of their early momentum drives they'll have in the 2nd & 3rd quarter.

INT's & Fumbles, whatever it takes, get to the fuxkin money.

View attachment 372873

The great equalizer.

2 of the last 3 national champions were #1 in the country in turnover margin.

We forced 23 in 15 games last year. Zero so far this year. I hope they’re on the way.
 
The great equalizer.

2 of the last 3 national champions were #1 in the country in turnover margin.

We forced 23 in 15 games last year. Zero so far this year. I hope they’re on the way.
The way you slow down a fast & unorthodox Offense like Wake's, it take the ball from them.

It forces their OC to go away from the gameplan & start calling their sequences more cautiously.

Mario is very familiar with Jake ****ert from when he was at Wash ST, he also has history with Rob Ezell from the Bama days. That should/could be a caveat to give Dawson & Heatherman some pretty good psychological insight into their tendencies as play callers.
 
Back
Top