I provided the link to the article because I agreed with the writer's sentiment in this particular case. However, after reading your link and surfing the dudes twitter account for a bit, I can definitely see why you would question his motivation for writing it.
The fact that her mama threw her under the bus blows all of mama's credibility IMO. If she'd said "no comment" or "my daughter believes in what she thinks happened" then I'd be inclined to think mama knows it's bs but isn't going to call her daughter a straight up vindictive liar to the entire world. To come out and straight up say that she thinks her daughter is lying convinces me that there is bad blood between mama and her daughter.
Elementary!!!!Oh, and if mama is to be believed and the daughter is making it up because she is vindictive, then why did Meyer fire Zach Smith? If Smith is innocent, Meyer wouldn't have fired him. Both things can't be true.
If all this is true, why’d Urban Meyer fire Zach Smith?
By the time they finish the “investigation” people will have forgotten it even existed I haven’t seen coverage on it in days.
Man, this ******* dude isn't fired yet?
True but once they announce he’s being retained they will get a **** show coming their way. This #metoo movement is pretty serious.
Story gets better and better. Also makes me wonder if that Maryland story coming out now was a coincidence. Texas has them on the schedule this year.
Now your getting it....Hold up didn’t Tom Herman work for Urban Meyer before he became a HC?