- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 41,293
Felt that way. Didn’t rewatch yet but yeah it seemed the plays were thereGuys are running open
Gotta find a way to make it click for TVD though too, if he can
Felt that way. Didn’t rewatch yet but yeah it seemed the plays were thereGuys are running open
Can't believe he said that.There are worse press conferences. Like the Pitt one where Narduzzi said they didn't do a good job replacing the players that left.
The game winning score by Fletcher has even taken a back seat to TVD’s play. I think it’s more than appropriate to hear from the young man himself.
Players already reacted on Twitter.Can't believe he said that.
I've got multiple kids at Pitt and they seem to love him and their staff.
One would think if it was physical, it would show up in practice. It's easy to pull a wr aside and ask if his passes have the same velocity.Part of the reason why I believe his struggles are not just bad decision-making, but partially due to physical limitations.
Even in the condensed TV real time view, wide open receivers can be seen. When the all 22 replay is shown, it’s even more obvious.Well if he checked the ball down more vs UVA, we win that game going away. He mentioned "checkdown" at least 10 times for a reason. Dawson likely hammered him about the INTs because UVA was dropping 7 into deeper zones leaving the flats WIDE OPEN for 5+ yards. You keep throwing that until they stop dropping 7 into deep zones.
Nowhere near as much as some people think. Teams are dropping 7 majority of the plays. We normally send out three wr’s, an Ol occasionally in McCormick and backs in the flats. 7 on 3-4 isn’t good odds. No creativity from the rb or te’s. No choice routes by the rb’s / te’s and no pressure on the seams. The O is very predictable.Guys are running open
I don't have the expertise in Air Raid route trees to say, but do we simply not sit our guys down in zones? I know there's the "choice" concept and option routes, but I feel like our guys are running directly into zone defenders.Nowhere near as much as some people think. Teams are dropping 7 majority of the plays. We normally send out three wr’s, an Ol occasionally in McCormick and backs in the flats. 7 on 3-4 isn’t good odds. No creativity from the rb or te’s.
Because they are.I don't have the expertise in Air Raid route trees to say, but do we simply not sit our guys down in zones? I know there's the "choice" concept and option routes, but I feel like our guys are running directly into zone defenders.
Any insight as to why Dawson has gone into a shell? Trying to protect TVD?Because they are.
X runs choice routes. I wouldn’t want too many of the other guys having that responsibility, some guys can’t run the normal routes like they’re supposed to and have caused a few int’s themselves.
There’s no creativity the last few weeks, it’s literally drop backs with very little motion , movement or it’s run. There’s the occasional orbit motion to BS but he goes to the flats.
We go max protect even though teams aren’t even blitzing us lol. Sending out three wr’s into 7 men dropping. Nobody respects the te’s or rb’s because it’s the same ole sane ole.
When we keep our te’s or rb’s in to block lb’s automatically come because they know there’s zero chance we run a delay behind the Lb coming. Which is a HS level adjustment when you’re showing max protection on film. Btw when’s the last time we’ve ran an actual route to a rb? Like an angle route ? A choice route in man allowing the rb to run the route dictated by coverage? Have we seen any wheel routes to a te or rb? Lashlee used them every game and had rb’s / te’s running open.
It’s X, JG, and Colby going out majority of the plays with nothing from the backs and te’s. On top of that the formations are getting more and more congested. Just like last year.
Tvd hasn’t played well against GT and UVA but the offense and route concepts have left a lot to be desired. Opposing coaches have obviously found something in the film and we need to adjust.
Would you credit the coaching philosophy change due to Mario being Mario or just an abundance of caution due to a TF making his first start and a banged up TVD?Because they are.
X runs choice routes. I wouldn’t want too many of the other guys having that responsibility, some guys can’t run the normal routes like they’re supposed to and have caused a few int’s themselves.
There’s no creativity the last few weeks, it’s literally drop backs with very little motion , movement or it’s run. There’s the occasional orbit motion to BS but he goes to the flats.
We go max protect even though teams aren’t even blitzing us lol. Sending out three wr’s into 7 men dropping. Nobody respects the te’s or rb’s because it’s the same ole sane ole.
When we keep our te’s or rb’s in to block lb’s automatically come because they know there’s zero chance we run a delay behind the Lb coming. Which is a HS level adjustment when you’re showing max protection on film. Btw when’s the last time we’ve ran an actual route to a rb? Like an angle route ? A choice route in man allowing the rb to run the route dictated by coverage? Have we seen any wheel routes to a te or rb? Lashlee used them every game and had rb’s / te’s running open.
It’s X, JG, and Colby going out majority of the plays with nothing from the backs and te’s. On top of that the formations are getting more and more congested. Just like last year.
Tvd hasn’t played well against GT and UVA but the offense and route concepts have left a lot to be desired. Opposing coaches have obviously found something in the film and we need to adjust.
No clue.Would you credit the coaching philosophy change due to Mario being Mario or just an abundance of caution due to a TF making his first start and a banged up TVD?