The Work 8-9: Fall Camp Edition

View as article
Pete should absolutely source that report. If you read this post it would lead you to believe Pete was at the practice
 
Advertisement
Maybe Pete is just relaying info from the numerous sources who have allowed him to beat Matt Porter and the rest on every single recruiting story this year. Maybe.
so Pete is "posting" and not reporting? He reads reads threads, talks to friends and watches videos/interviews.
Porter was talking about Pete's practice report fwiw NOT some recruiting story. Pete does a great job, but Porter had a valid point. Reporting about what you see at practice, without watching practice is silly. He should have been more clear about his information being of the second hand type.


Pete never said he was at practice. It's pretty common knowledge he wasn't. If he was, you'd see a lot more quality content than what the credentialed media has been putting out.

273.gif
 
I don't understand what's up with the Ariz haters. He does his thing, Matt does his, caneinsider does theirs. Leave Pete alone and worry about your own work. I like that for the most part Pete has let his Work do the talking.
 
Advertisement
I don't understand what's up with the Ariz haters. He does his thing, Matt does his, caneinsider does theirs. Leave Pete alone and worry about your own work. I like that for the most part Pete has let his Work do the talking.

Lotta losers on this board. See the guy with the Teddy Bear avatar. He thinks cancer is hilarious.
 
I don't understand what's up with the Ariz haters. He does his thing, Matt does his, caneinsider does theirs. Leave Pete alone and worry about your own work. I like that for the most part Pete has let his Work do the talking.

Lotta losers on this board. See the guy with the Teddy Bear avatar. He thinks cancer is hilarious.

Yep....especially when the cancer has hit a former Cane.
Not sure how/why that depraved POS remains on this forum.
 
Maybe Pete is just relaying info from the numerous sources who have allowed him to beat Matt Porter and the rest on every single recruiting story this year. Maybe.
so Pete is "posting" and not reporting? He reads reads threads, talks to friends and watches videos/interviews.
Porter was talking about Pete's practice report fwiw NOT some recruiting story. Pete does a great job, but Porter had a valid point. Reporting about what you see at practice, without watching practice is silly. He should have been more clear about his information being of the second hand type.


Pete never said he was at practice. It's pretty common knowledge he wasn't. If he was, you'd see a lot more quality content than what the credentialed media has been putting out.

How was it common knowledge?
 
Maybe Pete is just relaying info from the numerous sources who have allowed him to beat Matt Porter and the rest on every single recruiting story this year. Maybe.
so Pete is "posting" and not reporting? He reads reads threads, talks to friends and watches videos/interviews.
Porter was talking about Pete's practice report fwiw NOT some recruiting story. Pete does a great job, but Porter had a valid point. Reporting about what you see at practice, without watching practice is silly. He should have been more clear about his information being of the second hand type.


Pete never said he was at practice. It's pretty common knowledge he wasn't. If he was, you'd see a lot more quality content than what the credentialed media has been putting out.

How was it common knowledge?

Spin job going on.
 
Advertisement
Pete never claims info as his own. I would be one of the first in line to say otherwise if it were true. Matt Porter is a complete **** and acting like a **** on Twitter is flat out the most pussified thing a man can do with himself.

So if he doesn't claim that the info is his own shouldn't he credit his source? Not that I care either way just trying to see both sides. And yes porter is. Douche.

As far as I know, most sources don´t want (or can have) their names in public...
 
It's important to get caught up in who brings you the news, rather than the news they bring you. Why? Just, cuz, is why.
 
I don't understand what's up with the Ariz haters. He does his thing, Matt does his, caneinsider does theirs. Leave Pete alone and worry about your own work. I like that for the most part Pete has let his Work do the talking.

Lotta losers on this board. See the guy with the Teddy Bear avatar. He thinks cancer is hilarious.

lmao @ teddy bear avatar
 
Advertisement
Pete never claims info as his own. I would be one of the first in line to say otherwise if it were true. Matt Porter is a complete **** and acting like a **** on Twitter is flat out the most pussified thing a man can do with himself.

So if he doesn't claim that the info is his own shouldn't he credit his source? Not that I care either way just trying to see both sides. And yes porter is. Douche.

As far as I know, most sources don´t want (or can have) their names in public...

That's fine.. Then mention the sources as being anonymous. Either way, if a reporter is not getting the information firsthand he should make mention of it.
 
Pete never claims info as his own. I would be one of the first in line to say otherwise if it were true. Matt Porter is a complete **** and acting like a **** on Twitter is flat out the most pussified thing a man can do with himself.

So if he doesn't claim that the info is his own shouldn't he credit his source? Not that I care either way just trying to see both sides. And yes porter is. Douche.

As far as I know, most sources don´t want (or can have) their names in public...

That's fine.. Then mention the sources as being anonymous. Either way, if a reporter is not getting the information firsthand he should make mention of it.

The issue is if hes is getting info from other publications. Those places should absolutely be mentioned as sources
 
Pete never claims info as his own. I would be one of the first in line to say otherwise if it were true. Matt Porter is a complete **** and acting like a **** on Twitter is flat out the most pussified thing a man can do with himself.

So if he doesn't claim that the info is his own shouldn't he credit his source? Not that I care either way just trying to see both sides. And yes porter is. Douche.

As far as I know, most sources don´t want (or can have) their names in public...

That's fine.. Then mention the sources as being anonymous. Either way, if a reporter is not getting the information firsthand he should make mention of it.

The issue is if hes is getting info from other publications. Those places should absolutely be mentioned as sources

why are yall trying to play pete like he dont have any sources. Where the **** do you think he has been getting his other info in the past from ?.........
 
Advertisement
I didn't know that there were so many journalism teachers on our board critiquing if Peter cited his sources correctly or not.
 
I didn't know that there were so many journalism teachers on our board critiquing if Peter cited his sources correctly or not.

exactly they trying to act like pete aint legit lol. Sh*t is crazy man....
 
I didn't know that there were so many journalism teachers on our board critiquing if Peter cited his sources correctly or not.

Yeah like this fanbase that has never coached a down of football critiquing how Golden is handling the QB battle.
 
I am not saying he doesnt have sources. I not saying he isnt good at what he does, but if he is making practice reports off of other's publications he should list them as the source.

Thats All
 
Advertisement
Back
Top