I agree, he just had red zone issues his first year but the offense improved significantly his 2nd year and Matty Ice had 35TDs 5K yards.i agree. As a Atlanta Falcons fan Sark was the best OC we had since Kyle Shanahan. He went down with the bad coaching we had here, never should have been fired. Sarks play calling and scheme is top notch.
Bro I been a Falcons fan since '97 when I moved to ATL. 33 points a game is unheard of besides the Super Bowl season. It was one historically great season and unreasonable to think anybody could keep that pace going.The Falcons went from 33 points a game to 22 points a game.
There's a reason he was only there two years. Going from the Atlanta Falcons OC to the Alabama OC isn't a promotion.
The Super Bowl season placed unrealistic expectations going forward. Of course the first person they wanted to blame was Sark and the offense. Instead of the HC or GM.I agree, he just had red zone issues his first year but the offense improved significantly his 2nd year and Matty Ice had 35TDs 5K yards.
The NFL is the smarter play for the ol' scumbag. You give up the dictator nature of being a college head coach but in many other ways there's less outside pressure (especially in media markets like Jax or San Diego) and stress at the pro level.he supposedly turned it down. Doesn't want to deal with the transfer portal, impending "free agency" in college. Too much aggraavation for his health. Rumors he is feeling out jobs at Jacksonsville and Chargers.... interested maybe in NFL
I meant bust at the CFB level. Haskins did well at OSU.Dwayne haskins
Gunna be interesting on Defense for sure. I want to see change made off UNC aloneI used to be willing to give a coach 5 yrs, but data now shows by year 4 u should see the dividends, but year 3 will tell u if year 4 is warranted.
I know my boy is heated at the hire, but the justification is Sark had previous coaching experience, was considered a good recruiter, & now he’s been polished up under Saban. I don’t like the hire, but it’s not my team so Idgaf. I’m saying we don’t need weeks & weeks to make a decision to fire staff.
To ur point, we sure as **** didn’t think twice to fire two offensive staffs, but now all of sudden when the defense has come under scrutiny, firings don’t take place like this? Lol.
Imagine being so bad at your job they are willing to pay $15m to get rid of you, and it’s normal at this point. what a world we live in
You mean like Texas spending $40 million on coaching buyouts to run out and hire a drunk that’s going to fail? Only one ship like in the last 100 years, bro.
Or Michigan keeping the guy that’s the real problem, a human cumstain in pleated khaki dockers?
Use better comparators, bro. Those absolutely suck.
Texas has A LOT more moneyTexas is everything Miami thinks they want to be with the exact same results.
That's what people refuse to accept about Miami. We don't have nearly endless money like many other programs.Texas not playing around anymore. You got 3 years or your gone. With the endless resources and bank vault available to any HC..I don’t blame them.
Lol; what r u talking about? You r actually making my point even further. Lol. Schools r paying big money to buy out coaches, and we have a problem firing staff members. Lol.
No need to respond; I just need everyone to stop trying to adjust a narrative or point a finger when we are taking about MIAMI football.
Let me very clear to you & everyone else:
I right give at about Texas. I don’t give af about Michigan. I don’t give af about Bama or any other program not named Miami. However when I see these fck programs constantly shell out $ to make major changes & we drag our feet to make a slight change, that irks me. Idgaf bout how much $ these teams shell out, when we as fans ain’t asking for that.
Who do you guys think they’ll hire in 3 to 4 years?
We spent $4m for the right to hire our DC.That's what people refuse to accept about Miami. We don't have nearly endless money like many other programs.
I’m feeling optimistic for once. I hate itDo you think he’ll last that long?