Stat of the season

He caught one vs Temple but I don’t think it was a red zone throw. It may have been a longer pass.

But the point is that he is not being used properly in all phases of the game. It’s criminal so why would other receivers not see that and just say, nah, I’ll pass on Miami?

It’s very concerning.

Tunnel Screen vs Ohio
28yard vs Temple
Play out of the backfield vs ATM (RZ)
Emory to Young vs Clemson (RZ) (against Wiggins one on one)
 
Advertisement
RZ targets to Young
NCSt 0. 2 incompletions on the first drive otherwise caught all other targets. One I'm pretty sure was PI not called.
UVA 0. 0 incompletions
Clemson 1 = 1 TD. 2 incompletions outside the RZ
UNC 0. 3 incompletions (one was a holding call)
GT 0. 1 incompletion

How in the F can you not target your 6'5 WR at least once a game in the RZ? Especially after winning the jump ball vs 6'2 Nate Wiggins in his only ACC RZ target?
 
What point did you think you were making with this? I'm honestly confused.

The penalties are absorbable. There are many, many, many historical data points of very good football teams being ranked towards the bottom of the league in penalties.

Turnovers are a completely different discussion. Almost no teams ever have significantly negative turnover margins and win a lot of games. I'm not saying I'm happy with the penalties, but IMO the penalties are about a 3/10 concern while the turnovers are a 10/10, or worse. We're at DEFCON 1 with the turnovers.
 
Disagree on turnovers being a DIRECT correlation to coaching

Watch TVDs picks and tell me how it’s not on him… also scratch off changes BS turnover as well…

Not 100% on TVD when 6'5 young has 1 target in the redzone vs the ACC! That is 100% on the coaches.
 
This is why I NEVER hang my hat on 1st year starter success, NCAA or NFL.

Every player has weaknesses. Give hundreds of coaches a full off season to focus on all the plays you didn't make, and what caused you to not make them, and they will force you into those plays the very next season to see if you overcome those deficiencies.

The best players know what they stink @ and work hard on those weaknesses so its not easy to key on them.

Coaches were able to sniff out TvD weaknesses and gameplan it. Imo, coach Armstrong at Southern Miss was the 1st to show TvD true flaws in reading pre to post snap coverages.

We won that game but all watching saw exactly what I'm talking about.
I think back to a post @Brooklyndee made a couple springs ago when everyone was crowning TVD as the next 1st rd pick after his freshmen season and he said TVD still needed to progress in alot of areas because going through his progressions, intermediate throws, pocket presence all needed major improvement to be the qb people were saying he was and that Lashlee and playing bad comp hid those flaws. people thought he was just being a hater but it was nothing but facts.
 
Advertisement
The penalties are absorbable. There are many, many, many historical data points of very good football teams being ranked towards the bottom of the league in penalties.

Turnovers are a completely different discussion. Almost no teams ever have significantly negative turnover margins and win a lot of games. I'm not saying I'm happy with the penalties, but IMO the penalties are about a 3/10 concern while the turnovers are a 10/10, or worse. We're at DEFCON 1 with the turnovers.
I still dont get the relevance. Are you implying that penalties are not a reflection of coaching?
 
Miami is now 126th in the nation in turnovers. Terrible for any team, poison for a team that is trying to run the ball and play complementary football.

And this is not to blame one player- it is a team stat that falls on the players and coaches.
Well I’m blaming one player. I’m sorry I have too

He’s basically the nfl version of Daniel jones he’s lost weak *** arm can’t run only in a straight line and can’t read coverages
 
Really?

The point is that penalties and coaching literally have zero correlation. But that's what you claimed in the post I quoted.
You are bat**** crazy. You listed teams that win in spite of penalties as if that absolved blame. Thats the same stupid **** that you idiots pass of as fact. Miss me with that ****.
 
Advertisement
You are bat**** crazy. You listed teams that win in spite of penalties as if that absolved blame. Thats the same stupid **** that you idiots pass of as fact. Miss me with that ****.

So the teams with the best coaching in the country commit a lot of penalties which is an indictment against coaching. Got it.
 
How about Vanderbilt sucks and Tennesee doesn't suck. You are an imbecile.
Yes, Vanderbilt sucks, but they don't commit penalties.

Tennesse doesn't suck, but they commit a lot of penalties.

You making the connection yet?
 
Back
Top