Stadium

There will never be stadium in Coral Gables, but if they had a vision they could find a better venue than what they currently have.

Their wildest dreams and visions consist of an indoor practice facility and a couple of new squat racks.
 
Advertisement
This is what I don't get about the people who run Miami....

They care about money, however, they don't spend any to make any.

Folks wouldn't even know who Miami was w/o the vaunted history of the football program. Like USC (the real one), Miami is a private school. Expect USC know exactly where their bread and butter comes from, the football program. Therefore, they do everything in their power to make sure it's on the up and up including having a stadium they could call their own, in the Coliseum. When the city of Los Angeles was thinking about turning the Coliseum into a Museum after the Raiders bounced, USC stepped in, put in the necessary money to get it rehabbed and the rest is history.

Are we even making money from renting from SLS? I don't see why this admin can't see the bigger picture as in investing in our own stadium and w/in several years, make that money back and keep it flourishing. They could make a bid for concerts and other ventures, and all of the money would go to us. I don't get them, at all.

USC has about 40k students and a ton more alumni. Which means a ton more donors.

(((sigh))) you always have an excuse, don't you?

First off, whenever MIAMI has decided to put it's mind to anything they wanted, they've gotten PLENTY of donations that numbers into the BILLIONS. So stop with this whole small school/big school argument. It's old. Save that ish for the birds that don't have the internet, dog.
 
The City did not have the money secured to hold up their end of the bargain. That was common knowledge at the time, and it should be common knowledge now. The City also knew that they could get the money for the Marlins, which was the real prize. The OB was sacrificed for the Marlins. UM was just along for the ride. End of story. The City was NEVER serious about keeping the OB, no matter what any BS quotes anyone can find in some BS Herald article. People can rightfully spew hate on Donna for any number of things. The OB getting torn down and UM getting stuck in that morgue of a stadium in Miami Gardens is not one of them.

It's really freaking amazing how folks have forgotten or chosen to ignore how the city screwed UM. In the scramble to blame Shalala for everything, they've ignored that the city officials planned to push UM out the door from the beginning.

Let me ask you a question, why is it that anyone says something against Shalala you are the first to respond? You don't respond about the make of the team, you don't respond about Golden, you don't respond about w's and l's....only Shalala....what's up with that? And don't give no b/s answer about you're just making sure she's not lied upon...I want to know, seriously, why you defend her through tooth and nail. Are you related to her? Her love interest? Ex lover? Clinton? What's really going on w/ you?
 
The City did not have the money secured to hold up their end of the bargain. That was common knowledge at the time, and it should be common knowledge now. The City also knew that they could get the money for the Marlins, which was the real prize. The OB was sacrificed for the Marlins. UM was just along for the ride. End of story. The City was NEVER serious about keeping the OB, no matter what any BS quotes anyone can find in some BS Herald article. People can rightfully spew hate on Donna for any number of things. The OB getting torn down and UM getting stuck in that morgue of a stadium in Miami Gardens is not one of them.

It's really freaking amazing how folks have forgotten or chosen to ignore how the city screwed UM. In the scramble to blame Shalala for everything, they've ignored that the city officials planned to push UM out the door from the beginning.

Let me ask you a question, why is it that anyone says something against Shalala you are the first to respond? You don't respond about the make of the team, you don't respond about Golden, you don't respond about w's and l's....only Shalala....what's up with that? And don't give no b/s answer about you're just making sure she's not lied upon...I want to know, seriously, why you defend her through tooth and nail. Are you related to her? Her love interest? Ex lover? Clinton? What's really going on w/ you?

Let me ask you something...why do you feel the need to insult instead of have a legit discussion? How old are you, 12?

IMO, there's nothing to respond to about Ws/Ls, the makeup of the team, etc. Everything's on hold till Golden gets out and we get a new coach; no sense in discussing Xs and Os till the next guy comes in. We all know Golden misuses talent, that D'Onofrio sucks, that Coley is questionable at best, etc, etc. We all know we shouldn't have lost to Cinci, that we let Cook kill us against FSU, that we looked like crap in the 2nd half of Nebraska, etc, etc, etc.

There were more things to talk about a few years ago, and I definitely talked more then. Since maybe the end of 2013, it's been one big ***** and moan fest around here, so I only post about things which we can still have legit arguments about.

I definitely have responded to other topics re: coaching searches and recruits.

FWIW, I'm not defending Shalala here. I'm pointing out the facts. The facts are that the city screwed UM and wanted to shut down the OB from the very beginning. That has been well established.
 
Last edited:
This is what I don't get about the people who run Miami....

They care about money, however, they don't spend any to make any.

Folks wouldn't even know who Miami was w/o the vaunted history of the football program. Like USC (the real one), Miami is a private school. Expect USC know exactly where their bread and butter comes from, the football program. Therefore, they do everything in their power to make sure it's on the up and up including having a stadium they could call their own, in the Coliseum. When the city of Los Angeles was thinking about turning the Coliseum into a Museum after the Raiders bounced, USC stepped in, put in the necessary money to get it rehabbed and the rest is history.

Are we even making money from renting from SLS? I don't see why this admin can't see the bigger picture as in investing in our own stadium and w/in several years, make that money back and keep it flourishing. They could make a bid for concerts and other ventures, and all of the money would go to us. I don't get them, at all.

USC has about 40k students and a ton more alumni. Which means a ton more donors.

(((sigh))) you always have an excuse, don't you?

First off, whenever MIAMI has decided to put it's mind to anything they wanted, they've gotten PLENTY of donations that numbers into the BILLIONS. So stop with this whole small school/big school argument. It's old. Save that ish for the birds that don't have the internet, dog.

You're wrong. We've been over this before. Most of UM's donations are earmarked for other purposes, not football. In other words, UM cannot use that money for football.

The donations that go to UM athletics are paltry in comparison to other schools.
 
This is what I don't get about the people who run Miami....

They care about money, however, they don't spend any to make any.

Folks wouldn't even know who Miami was w/o the vaunted history of the football program. Like USC (the real one), Miami is a private school. Expect USC know exactly where their bread and butter comes from, the football program. Therefore, they do everything in their power to make sure it's on the up and up including having a stadium they could call their own, in the Coliseum. When the city of Los Angeles was thinking about turning the Coliseum into a Museum after the Raiders bounced, USC stepped in, put in the necessary money to get it rehabbed and the rest is history.

Are we even making money from renting from SLS? I don't see why this admin can't see the bigger picture as in investing in our own stadium and w/in several years, make that money back and keep it flourishing. They could make a bid for concerts and other ventures, and all of the money would go to us. I don't get them, at all.

USC has about 40k students and a ton more alumni. Which means a ton more donors.

(((sigh))) you always have an excuse, don't you?

First off, whenever MIAMI has decided to put it's mind to anything they wanted, they've gotten PLENTY of donations that numbers into the BILLIONS. So stop with this whole small school/big school argument. It's old. Save that ish for the birds that don't have the internet, dog.

You're wrong. We've been over this before. Most of UM's donations are earmarked for other purposes, not football. In other words, UM cannot use that money for football.

The donations that go to UM athletics are paltry in comparison to other schools.

Bingo
 
The City did not have the money secured to hold up their end of the bargain. That was common knowledge at the time, and it should be common knowledge now. The City also knew that they could get the money for the Marlins, which was the real prize. The OB was sacrificed for the Marlins. UM was just along for the ride. End of story. The City was NEVER serious about keeping the OB, no matter what any BS quotes anyone can find in some BS Herald article. People can rightfully spew hate on Donna for any number of things. The OB getting torn down and UM getting stuck in that morgue of a stadium in Miami Gardens is not one of them.

It's really freaking amazing how folks have forgotten or chosen to ignore how the city screwed UM. In the scramble to blame Shalala for everything, they've ignored that the city officials planned to push UM out the door from the beginning.

Let me ask you a question, why is it that anyone says something against Shalala you are the first to respond? You don't respond about the make of the team, you don't respond about Golden, you don't respond about w's and l's....only Shalala....what's up with that? And don't give no b/s answer about you're just making sure she's not lied upon...I want to know, seriously, why you defend her through tooth and nail. Are you related to her? Her love interest? Ex lover? Clinton? What's really going on w/ you?

Let me ask you something...why do you feel the need to insult instead of have a legit discussion? How old are you, 12?

IMO, there's nothing to respond to about Ws/Ls, the makeup of the team, etc. Everything's on hold till Golden gets out and we get a new coach; no sense in discussing Xs and Os till the next guy comes in. We all know Golden misuses talent, that D'Onofrio sucks, that Coley is questionable at best, etc, etc. We all know we shouldn't have lost to Cinci, that we let Cook kill us against FSU, that we looked like crap in the 2nd half of Nebraska, etc, etc, etc.

There were more things to talk about a few years ago, and I definitely talked more then. Since maybe the end of 2013, it's been one big ***** and moan fest around here, so I only post about things which we can still have legit arguments about.

I definitely have responded to other topics re: coaching searches and recruits.

FWIW, I'm not defending Shalala here. I'm pointing out the facts. The facts are that the city screwed UM and wanted to shut down the OB from the very beginning. That has been well established.

Usually when someone answers a ? w a ? implies guilt. Who insulted you?? Didn't call you out your name or anything. Slow down, re-read my questions. I'm asking you questions. So are you 12?
 
Advertisement
The City did not have the money secured to hold up their end of the bargain. That was common knowledge at the time, and it should be common knowledge now. The City also knew that they could get the money for the Marlins, which was the real prize. The OB was sacrificed for the Marlins. UM was just along for the ride. End of story. The City was NEVER serious about keeping the OB, no matter what any BS quotes anyone can find in some BS Herald article. People can rightfully spew hate on Donna for any number of things. The OB getting torn down and UM getting stuck in that morgue of a stadium in Miami Gardens is not one of them.

It's really freaking amazing how folks have forgotten or chosen to ignore how the city screwed UM. In the scramble to blame Shalala for everything, they've ignored that the city officials planned to push UM out the door from the beginning.

Let me ask you a question, why is it that anyone says something against Shalala you are the first to respond? You don't respond about the make of the team, you don't respond about Golden, you don't respond about w's and l's....only Shalala....what's up with that? And don't give no b/s answer about you're just making sure she's not lied upon...I want to know, seriously, why you defend her through tooth and nail. Are you related to her? Her love interest? Ex lover? Clinton? What's really going on w/ you?

Let me ask you something...why do you feel the need to insult instead of have a legit discussion? How old are you, 12?

IMO, there's nothing to respond to about Ws/Ls, the makeup of the team, etc. Everything's on hold till Golden gets out and we get a new coach; no sense in discussing Xs and Os till the next guy comes in. We all know Golden misuses talent, that D'Onofrio sucks, that Coley is questionable at best, etc, etc. We all know we shouldn't have lost to Cinci, that we let Cook kill us against FSU, that we looked like crap in the 2nd half of Nebraska, etc, etc, etc.

There were more things to talk about a few years ago, and I definitely talked more then. Since maybe the end of 2013, it's been one big ***** and moan fest around here, so I only post about things which we can still have legit arguments about.

I definitely have responded to other topics re: coaching searches and recruits.

FWIW, I'm not defending Shalala here. I'm pointing out the facts. The facts are that the city screwed UM and wanted to shut down the OB from the very beginning. That has been well established.

Usually when someone answers a ? w a ? implies guilt. Who insulted you?? Didn't call you out your name or anything. Slow down, re-read my questions. I'm asking you questions. So are you 12?


Pretty sure I answered your questions in full, chief.

Of course you didn't call me a name...you just alleged that I only post to defend Shalala, that I may be related to her, or may be her (*******) lover. Those are insults on the board.

Pretty sure I explained my posting history, and why and where I've posted.

Now it's your turn. Are you, in fact, 12? Or retarded? Or maybe just a little developmentally disabled? Or just a homophobic asshat who doesn't have the mental capacity to actually have a cogent discussion?
 
Last edited:
How convenient. The University of Miami's Football program made the University one of the biggest household brands in the country and created a lot of $ to attract students and raise buildings. Yet, when the Football program is in desperate need of support (stadium, coaches, etc.) the University washes its hands.

Miami may not have the "donors" but more importantly has lacked true leadership and a vision for the program.
 
I remember what Doak Campbell looked like in the early 80's. If you look at that place now you can see what consistent winning can do for a program. I think they are about to do another $250 million renovation. That's what being serious about football gets you. Bowl money, ACC money, imagine what the OB could've looked like now. It's just a shame how the whole situation at Miami has been ****ed up.
Take a look at what some college football teams are worth annually-
What's your college team worth.
Florida State isn't even in the top 20 and they are worth $68 million a year.

Bot, what the **** is so hard to understand about how much college football is worth? You idiots are sitting on a goldmine and you are ****ing it away. Pay attention dumbasses, just because you don't care about football doesn't mean the rest of the country doesn't. The U brand could be easy money.
 
It's really freaking amazing how folks have forgotten or chosen to ignore how the city screwed UM. In the scramble to blame Shalala for everything, they've ignored that the city officials planned to push UM out the door from the beginning.

Let me ask you a question, why is it that anyone says something against Shalala you are the first to respond? You don't respond about the make of the team, you don't respond about Golden, you don't respond about w's and l's....only Shalala....what's up with that? And don't give no b/s answer about you're just making sure she's not lied upon...I want to know, seriously, why you defend her through tooth and nail. Are you related to her? Her love interest? Ex lover? Clinton? What's really going on w/ you?

Let me ask you something...why do you feel the need to insult instead of have a legit discussion? How old are you, 12?

IMO, there's nothing to respond to about Ws/Ls, the makeup of the team, etc. Everything's on hold till Golden gets out and we get a new coach; no sense in discussing Xs and Os till the next guy comes in. We all know Golden misuses talent, that D'Onofrio sucks, that Coley is questionable at best, etc, etc. We all know we shouldn't have lost to Cinci, that we let Cook kill us against FSU, that we looked like crap in the 2nd half of Nebraska, etc, etc, etc.

There were more things to talk about a few years ago, and I definitely talked more then. Since maybe the end of 2013, it's been one big ***** and moan fest around here, so I only post about things which we can still have legit arguments about.

I definitely have responded to other topics re: coaching searches and recruits.

FWIW, I'm not defending Shalala here. I'm pointing out the facts. The facts are that the city screwed UM and wanted to shut down the OB from the very beginning. That has been well established.

Usually when someone answers a ? w a ? implies guilt. Who insulted you?? Didn't call you out your name or anything. Slow down, re-read my questions. I'm asking you questions. So are you 12?


Pretty sure I answered your questions in full, chief.

Of course you didn't call me a name...you just alleged that I only post to defend Shalala, that I may be related to her, or may be her (*******) lover. Those are insults on the board.

Pretty sure I explained my posting history, and why and where I've posted.

Now it's your turn. Are you, in fact, 12? Or retarded? Or maybe just a little developmentally disabled? Or just a homophobic asshat who doesn't have the mental capacity to actually have a cogent discussion?

First racism now the "r" word? C'mon. A) That's not very progressive of you and B) you're better than that. We'd expect this out of DK72 but not you. Not you. I'm very disappointed.
 
How convenient. The University of Miami's Football program made the University one of the biggest household brands in the country and created a lot of $ to attract students and raise buildings. Yet, when the Football program is in desperate need of support (stadium, coaches, etc.) the University washes its hands.

Miami may not have the "donors" but more importantly has lacked true leadership and a vision for the program.

The lack of donors is as much on the school over the years as it is on anything else. They choose and chose to go a different route in their fundraising efforts. They always default to the easy route of relying on a few "significant" donors/gifts in lieu of the hard work of cultivating thousands of smaller ones. Then when pressed they cite the smaller nature of our alumni base while conveniently never factoring in the the years of fundraising neglect on their end when they sat atop one of the hottest commodities in all of sports.

We can agree or disagree with Chuck Todd's political leanings but even he (as a non-alum that gives thousands per year) has spoken out about how they're content with only putting in the real fundraising work in relation to the "major" gifts. Btw, this doesn't absolve the university as a whole in relation to how they financially deal with the athletics dept but that's a whole other topic.
 
How convenient. The University of Miami's Football program made the University one of the biggest household brands in the country and created a lot of $ to attract students and raise buildings. Yet, when the Football program is in desperate need of support (stadium, coaches, etc.) the University washes its hands.

Miami may not have the "donors" but more importantly has lacked true leadership and a vision for the program.

The lack of donors is as much on the school over the years as it is on anything else. They choose and chose to go a different route in their fundraising efforts. They always default to the easy route of relying on a few "significant" donors/gifts in lieu of the hard work of cultivating thousands of smaller ones. Then when pressed they cite the smaller nature of our alumni base while conveniently never factoring in the the years of fundraising neglect on their end when they sat atop one of the hottest commodities in all of sports.

We can agree or disagree with Chuck Todd's political leanings but even he (as a non-alum that gives thousands per year) has spoken out about how they're content with only putting in the real fundraising work in relation to the "major" gifts. Btw, this doesn't absolve the university as a whole in relation to how they financially deal with the athletics dept but that's a whole other topic.


As part of the Momentum 2 fundraising drive, there was an option to give to athletics...as there always is for anyone who wants to donate. It was part and parcel of the larger fundraising effort. Of the ~2 billion raised between 2012 and now, I think a little over 100 mil was raised for athletics. So it took UM 3 years to raise 100 mil, out of a goal of 125 mil for athletics.

LINK

Meanwhile, Duke raised 144 mil for athletics in the first 9 months of their recent university-wide fundraising campaign.
And Tennessee's athletic department raised 48 mil in one year, without the benefit of a university-wide campaign--their average per-year giving to athletics is about 44 mil.

Bottom line is that UM has a smaller donor base than many schools, and the donors we DO have don'tt give to athletics in the same way that other schools do.
 
Let me ask you a question, why is it that anyone says something against Shalala you are the first to respond? You don't respond about the make of the team, you don't respond about Golden, you don't respond about w's and l's....only Shalala....what's up with that? And don't give no b/s answer about you're just making sure she's not lied upon...I want to know, seriously, why you defend her through tooth and nail. Are you related to her? Her love interest? Ex lover? Clinton? What's really going on w/ you?

Let me ask you something...why do you feel the need to insult instead of have a legit discussion? How old are you, 12?

IMO, there's nothing to respond to about Ws/Ls, the makeup of the team, etc. Everything's on hold till Golden gets out and we get a new coach; no sense in discussing Xs and Os till the next guy comes in. We all know Golden misuses talent, that D'Onofrio sucks, that Coley is questionable at best, etc, etc. We all know we shouldn't have lost to Cinci, that we let Cook kill us against FSU, that we looked like crap in the 2nd half of Nebraska, etc, etc, etc.

There were more things to talk about a few years ago, and I definitely talked more then. Since maybe the end of 2013, it's been one big ***** and moan fest around here, so I only post about things which we can still have legit arguments about.

I definitely have responded to other topics re: coaching searches and recruits.

FWIW, I'm not defending Shalala here. I'm pointing out the facts. The facts are that the city screwed UM and wanted to shut down the OB from the very beginning. That has been well established.

Usually when someone answers a ? w a ? implies guilt. Who insulted you?? Didn't call you out your name or anything. Slow down, re-read my questions. I'm asking you questions. So are you 12?


Pretty sure I answered your questions in full, chief.

Of course you didn't call me a name...you just alleged that I only post to defend Shalala, that I may be related to her, or may be her (*******) lover. Those are insults on the board.

Pretty sure I explained my posting history, and why and where I've posted.

Now it's your turn. Are you, in fact, 12? Or retarded? Or maybe just a little developmentally disabled? Or just a homophobic asshat who doesn't have the mental capacity to actually have a cogent discussion?

First racism now the "r" word? C'mon. A) That's not very progressive of you and B) you're better than that. We'd expect this out of DK72 but not you. Not you. I'm very disappointed.

I know. It sucks that I abandoned my principles like that. Sometimes I gotta stoop to this level on the board.

I'll do some penance and listen to Rachel Maddow interview Bernie Sanders while the game is on later today.
 
Advertisement
I remember what Doak Campbell looked like in the early 80's. If you look at that place now you can see what consistent winning can do for a program. I think they are about to do another $250 million renovation. That's what being serious about football gets you. Bowl money, ACC money, imagine what the OB could've looked like now. It's just a shame how the whole situation at Miami has been ****ed up.
Take a look at what some college football teams are worth annually-
What's your college team worth.
Florida State isn't even in the top 20 and they are worth $68 million a year.

Bot, what the **** is so hard to understand about how much college football is worth? You idiots are sitting on a goldmine and you are ****ing it away. Pay attention dumbasses, just because you don't care about football doesn't mean the rest of the country doesn't. The U brand could be easy money.

You do know that the renovations at Doak were largely funded by state tax dollars, right? FSU uses the rooms inside Doak for administrative offices and classrooms, so they were able to claim it as an academic/administrative use facility and got funding from the state to do the reno.
 
I remember what Doak Campbell looked like in the early 80's. If you look at that place now you can see what consistent winning can do for a program. I think they are about to do another $250 million renovation. That's what being serious about football gets you. Bowl money, ACC money, imagine what the OB could've looked like now. It's just a shame how the whole situation at Miami has been ****ed up.
Take a look at what some college football teams are worth annually-
What's your college team worth.
Florida State isn't even in the top 20 and they are worth $68 million a year.

Bot, what the **** is so hard to understand about how much college football is worth? You idiots are sitting on a goldmine and you are ****ing it away. Pay attention dumbasses, just because you don't care about football doesn't mean the rest of the country doesn't. The U brand could be easy money.

You do know that the renovations at Doak were largely funded by state tax dollars, right? FSU uses the rooms inside Doak for administrative offices and classrooms, so they were able to claim it as an academic/administrative use facility and got funding from the state to do the reno.

Do you have a source for that? Most of what I've found is boosters and through the sale of bonds for the renovations they are doing now. That's all private funding.
 
Last edited:
I remember what Doak Campbell looked like in the early 80's. If you look at that place now you can see what consistent winning can do for a program. I think they are about to do another $250 million renovation. That's what being serious about football gets you. Bowl money, ACC money, imagine what the OB could've looked like now. It's just a shame how the whole situation at Miami has been ****ed up.
Take a look at what some college football teams are worth annually-
What's your college team worth.
Florida State isn't even in the top 20 and they are worth $68 million a year.

Bot, what the **** is so hard to understand about how much college football is worth? You idiots are sitting on a goldmine and you are ****ing it away. Pay attention dumbasses, just because you don't care about football doesn't mean the rest of the country doesn't. The U brand could be easy money.

You do know that the renovations at Doak were largely funded by state tax dollars, right? FSU uses the rooms inside Doak for administrative offices and classrooms, so they were able to claim it as an academic/administrative use facility and got funding from the state to do the reno.

Do you have a source for that? Most of what I've found is boosters and through the sale of bonds for the renovations they are doing now.

I was talking about the renos from what it was like in the 80s to now. Back then it looked like an erector set; when they put the brick exterior on it in the 90s, they put admin offices and classrooms on the inside.

Not sure about the latest renos; I'll look to see what I can find.
 
Last edited:
I remember what Doak Campbell looked like in the early 80's. If you look at that place now you can see what consistent winning can do for a program. I think they are about to do another $250 million renovation. That's what being serious about football gets you. Bowl money, ACC money, imagine what the OB could've looked like now. It's just a shame how the whole situation at Miami has been ****ed up.
Take a look at what some college football teams are worth annually-
What's your college team worth.
Florida State isn't even in the top 20 and they are worth $68 million a year.

Bot, what the **** is so hard to understand about how much college football is worth? You idiots are sitting on a goldmine and you are ****ing it away. Pay attention dumbasses, just because you don't care about football doesn't mean the rest of the country doesn't. The U brand could be easy money.

You do know that the renovations at Doak were largely funded by state tax dollars, right? FSU uses the rooms inside Doak for administrative offices and classrooms, so they were able to claim it as an academic/administrative use facility and got funding from the state to do the reno.

Do you have a source for that? Most of what I've found is boosters and through the sale of bonds for the renovations they are doing now.

I was talking about the renos from what it was like in the 80s to now. Back then it looked like an erector set; when the put the brick exterior on it in the 90s, they put admin offices and classrooms on the inside.

Not sure about the latest renos; I'll look to see what I can find.
Exactly, stadium was disgusting back in the day. I read it cost $250k to build 65 years ago. I'm not full arguing about the funding, it's easily possible some of that money came from the state. But what they've done with that stadium is really nice. That program is worth a lot of money. I think they plan to fully fund all sport scholarships with interest from their 'war chest' before to long. Them boys up there take their football seriously. Miami should take a look at the money being made up there.
 
Back
Top