And Larry Coker was a genius because he was undefeated his first two years.
Great argument. I'd like to think you're better than that, but apparently you're not.
Record isn't indicative of everything, but Golden does have several coaching flaws. Of course he speaks well, recruits well (other than DT), so I guess all is forgiven.
All I'm saying is that Golden isn't perfect, like half of this board seems to think he is.
Same argument you made, ***. You claimed our coaches are (whatever word got the asterisks) because their record is 13-11, and our defense has struggled. I told you that Larry Coker is a genius because he was undefeated for two years and had great offenses and defenses. It's the other side of the same exact dopey argument you made.
Golden has coaching flaws? Who doesn't? List these coaching flaws. And who said he was perfect? No one. Some of us are happy to have him, though, because we know he's going to have the program rolling. That seems to be frowned upon by the perpetually mopey internet heroes.
Some of you UM fans try too hard to be critical of the program to show how unbiased you are so all the opposing fan turds who hang around here will admire you. You're trying too hard to be real by being such a tough critic, and it's lame.