TrueFloridian
Sophomore
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2013
- Messages
- 4,652
I don’t think he’s soft like Pope dude. He maybe butt hurt about not playing but rarely is a RB a pu$$y.No sorry Lingard is a *****. Patchan's a good dude.
I don’t think he’s soft like Pope dude. He maybe butt hurt about not playing but rarely is a RB a pu$$y.No sorry Lingard is a *****. Patchan's a good dude.
We all are projecting but IF they decide to dip, I think that gives some credence to their attitude about it. Drop after drop, awful play after awful play they kept getting chances and kept getting trotted out. Then in Spring they see their snaps start to dwindle and immediately hit the portal? That's soft. For the record, I rarely want ANY cane to transfer, I want lifers. But in this scenario I cannot see how that is acceptable or forgivable. There always can be an exception but unless that comes out it is what it is.
Yeah. NCAA needs to do something about this IC rule lol.
Thankfully they're totally competent and proactive with their product. /s
What happens if we stay at this 25 number, then kids in limbo gotta drop down a division and then the domino effect just fvcks over athletes in lower divisons?
I remember dudes saying that about Hankerson too. Let it work it’s way out. We see they are not performing but no need trash the kidsWho would start over **** and Wiggy
well Emmert just got extended so I'm sure this will be his first order of business especially if Saban tells him it needs to be done..Not to derail the thread but my proposal would be this:
25 ICs (your choice between HS and portal)
1:1 exemption ratio for any of your current players that hit the portal (for example, 3 of your current players hit the portal, you can now bring in an additional 3 ICs so you could bring in a total of 28 ICs)
85 limit stays in effect (once Covid eligibility runs out)
This allows more HS kids to get offers and teams to have a fighting chance to be near the 85 limit. All those portal kids have better odds of finding a landing spot.
well Emmert just got extended so I'm sure this will be his first order of business especially if Saban tells him it needs to be done..
So they get demoted, presumably told they aren’t going to play and they should still stay?
Would you?
funny you say this because I can't remember ever seeing anyone with worse body language than Pope. He looks so indifferent, drives me nuts. There is another characteristic to his movement that I will not comment on but is very noticeable.Pope is mentally soft but cares. Wiggins don’t even look like he cares. His body
Language is horrible
I am calling assists on every like this post receives.Drop the ball as some would say...
Hankerson just wasn’t a team player. He was all about himself and didn’t care what happened when he wasn’t playing. When he finally got the PT he played really well. Pope and Wiggins already started for an entire season. Completely different situations.I remember dudes saying that about Hankerson too. Let it work it’s way out. We see they are not performing but no need trash the kids
I remember dudes saying that about Hankerson too. Let it work it’s way out. We see they are not performing but no need trash the kids
Not to derail the thread but my proposal would be this:
25 ICs (your choice between HS and portal)
1:1 exemption ratio for any of your current players that hit the portal (for example, 3 of your current players hit the portal, you can now bring in an additional 3 ICs so you could bring in a total of 28 ICs)
85 limit stays in effect (once Covid eligibility runs out)
This allows more HS kids to get offers and teams to have a fighting chance to be near the 85 limit. All those portal kids have better odds of finding a landing spot.
That's a tough call. Your chance of going to the NFL is pretty bad, seeing as you can't even beat out the younger guys on your team. It's a slim chance that changes just by getting a chance to play somewhere else if that's your bar. I guess you take that chance and uproot your experience instead of just taking the scholarship and taking your major now as the primary career driver and staying at UM.So they get demoted, presumably told they aren’t going to play and they should still stay?
Would you?
Drop the ball as some would say...
Underrated post.We all are projecting but IF they decide to dip, I think that gives some credence to their attitude about it. Drop after drop, awful play after awful play they kept getting chances and kept getting trotted out. Then in Spring they see their snaps start to dwindle and immediately hit the portal? That's soft. For the record, I rarely want ANY cane to transfer, I want lifers. But in this scenario I cannot see how that is acceptable or forgivable. There always can be an exception but unless that comes out it is what it is.
VERY UNDERRATED POSTNot to derail the thread but my proposal would be this:
25 ICs (your choice between HS and portal)
1:1 exemption ratio for any of your current players that hit the portal (for example, 3 of your current players hit the portal, you can now bring in an additional 3 ICs so you could bring in a total of 28 ICs)
85 limit stays in effect (once Covid eligibility runs out)
This allows more HS kids to get offers and teams to have a fighting chance to be near the 85 limit. All those portal kids have better odds of finding a landing spot.