forums

So, I thought the Gaytors were going to take a step back, but...

Advertisement
TheOriginalCane said:
It's actually what the chart is saying. Sorry that you misread it. Why did you post it? What do YOU think it is saying?
Click to expand...
The chart is comparing schedules. It means that UF winning 8 games would give them a comparable resume to us winning 10. It's not a commentary on team quality.
 
ALLoverCANE said:
Lmaoooo

Amazing stuff. Complete capitulation by you.
Click to expand...
You don't even know what that means. Keep going though. Each one of your replies corroborates my position. Your mental illness coupled with your complete lack of intelligence is on display for all to enjoy. Maybe you can post it in a graphic for all to enjoy, then you can tell them that they're all wrong and type out "lol" to let everyone know how funny it is (to you only) and when they "lol" back, you can add them to the dunce list.

Are you an Alabammy fan or Auburn? I can smell the incest on your breath.
 
ALLoverCANE said:
This is a function of schedule. If they win 9 games they're a playoff lock, while we likely need 11. 7.5 o/u for UF is equivalent to 9.5 for us.
Click to expand...

confused-thinking.gif
 
TheOriginalCane said:
I'm not going to argue too much here, even though I think the Gator floor is 7-5.

The main reason Florida can get to 7 wins is that the SEC is, as always, overrated. That is not to say that there is not talent out there. Yes, there are many talented SEC teams. But playing an SEC schedule AND taking tough losses usually causes a "coulda/woulda/shoulda" Top 25 team to finish unranked. So this concept that there are 10 SEC teams that can win 9 or more regular season games is just bull****.

I doubt Florida goes 6-6 or worse, unless Lagway is on the sidelines for most of the year. But 7-5 is definitely possible.
Click to expand...

It's going to happen.

6-6 floor, 8-4 ceiling. Most likely outcome = 7-5
 
Advertisement
BigDikDaddyFromCincinnati said:
You don't even know what that means. Keep going though. Each one of your replies corroborates my position. Your mental illness coupled with your complete lack of intelligence is on display for all to enjoy. Maybe you can post it in a graphic for all to enjoy, then you can tell them that they're all wrong and type out "lol" to let everyone know how funny it is (to you only) and when they "lol" back, you can add them to the dunce list.

Are you an Alabammy fan or Auburn? I can smell the incest on your breath.
Click to expand...
Lol yes it's very funny to me. Keep it coming!
 
ALLoverCANE said:
Oh here's another guy that defends our pathetic conference lol weird that there are so many of you that want to go down with this sinking ship
Click to expand...

The only one that is going down is you, going down on the gaytors. Give the lizard love some rest, man.
 
Last edited:
ALLoverCANE said:
Oh I'm another guy that defends and sucks Gator **** while alking sh8t on my supposed team the Canes lol weird that I am the only one that wants to go down with this sinking ship of swallowing gator jsim because I'm a punk ***** dingbat ***aloon
Click to expand...
FIFY, ****boy

P.S. thread banned this **** sucker and send his ***** *** to purgatory

Lucky Im not a maude, you would've been muted
 
ALLoverCANE said:
The chart is comparing schedules. It means that UF winning 8 games would give them a comparable resume to us winning 10. It's not a commentary on team quality.
Click to expand...


It absolutely is. It is saying that the SEC is soooooooooooo good that Florida is automatically more equal to Pitt and K-State and UNC and 7 other ACC schools BY THREE GAMES. Not because of the inherent goodness of the team itself (Florida), but they are ALREADY more deserving because of their conference.

I've never said it is INTRINSIC "better". I'm saying it is RANKING "better", right off the bat. False myths are created, and then they are validated. Quite literally, that chart says it would be a tossup on whether to give the 12th spot in the playoffs to an 11-win Pitt or an 8-win Vanderbilt. That is how Vandy is "3 games better than" Pitt. Not because of what might happen on the field. But because that chart indicates that an 11-win Pitt and an 8-win Vanderbilt are at the same level in the conversation. They have been equated. They are comparable.

And it's bull****.
 
Advertisement
ALLoverCANE said:
Oh here's another guy that defends our pathetic conference lol weird that there are so many of you that want to go down with this sinking ship
Click to expand...
As a friend, I'd encourage you to take a step back and look at the way you're being perceived here. I understand that might not be easy because it's hard to see the forest for the trees but ask yourself how your argument would differ from a hardcore Gator fan's. A smart person once told me that if you're in an argument and having to defend and explain, you're not going to get your point across.

It's best to just walk away.
 
They messed up big time IMO not going after more DL in the portal. Their starting DL is definitely strong as Banks (was in a boot) Sapp, and Gumbs can play - I legit see nothing behind them of value.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3271.png
    IMG_3271.png
    319.3 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_3272.png
    IMG_3272.png
    316.8 KB · Views: 0
filmcane said:
...I've been reading about the Gates the last couple of days that they are better than I thought they would be this season. I thought they lost a lot and their QB seemed OK, but not special. But, I'm guessing.

For you experts out there, how good will they be this year and how do they line up against us?
Click to expand...
greece looks GIF
 
Back
Top