Oh im fine pal....Im easy like Sunday morningAre you gonna be ok?
Good TimesOh im fine pal....Im easy like Sunday morning
Donna and company used program for a cash cow, did not invest a a dime .10 cents in program. this was compounded by arms race in facilities(by college football) during her reign of error. Decision to replace B.James and reorganize AD dept was a palace coup by Columbus High group with $$$$ and like entire fan base was sick and tired of 5-3 in Coastal division.CMD was in over his head and it showed he should have accepted Temple job and made his mistakes(on a smaller stage) then maybe made a big time jump .For the reason that just in case it didn't work out, I would have to see some CIS members curse the name of one of the greatest legends in UM Football history. To this day I will never understand that mentality. I still see angry posts about Manny who actually did some good things and worked is *** off. ****, some are still blasting Golden and Shannon. I just dont get it. These guys did not come here to destroy the program. They tried their best and it did not work out. I for one hope Manny has the second best D in the country this year. If you absolutely need to be angry, direct it towards the administration who you could argue got lazy on their hires in hindsight. In the end these guys are all still human beings....spare me your "they make millions" BS. Still no reason for such hate. With that said, welcome Coach Gattis. What a terrific hire!! Side question: in any of the 3455 page insider threads, did anyone mention Coach Gattis as a possibility? I mean no disrespect to those who do have inside info...it is appreciated but you have my vote to get rid of the thousands of pages threads....wait. Are we voting on that?
Also, I don't care if it's unpopular and I get 50 down votes, Manny's defense (first stint as DC) revitalized this program. We were right neck and neck with clemson for most categories and our defense was dominant. The chain brought life to our program and that D was what got us to #2 in 2017.
I don't have the energy to die on this hill but if you look up the actual statistics we were top 10 and in some cases top 3 in nearly all important categories through that tenure. Maybe dominant isn't the word you like but it was the best defense we've had since the early shannon daysIt definitely was not "dominant"
But yes it did some good things early on, and then started to slide.
They did it to Randy Shannon and RS was a Cane through and through.Did you really try and compare Dorsey to Manny Diaz smh
I for one hope Manny has the second best D in the country this year.
Adjusted for schedule...We simply were not.I don't have the energy to die on this hill but if you look up the actual statistics we were top 10 and in some cases top 3 in nearly all important categories through that tenure. Maybe dominant isn't the word you like but it was the best defense we've had since the early shannon days
Adjusted for schedule...We simply were not.
Carry on
eh I changed my mind,.... yeah I was providing factual information, not actually debatable. HOWEVER since you want to factor in SOS and competition, i looked that up too
so we went from al golden and 'NO D' to immediately the next season:
2016- #13
2017 - #13
2018 - #8
so you're wrong pal, according to just about any and every metric out there
I'm not saying I want manny ever calling plays here again, i'm just not ignorant and letting his HC tenure cloud the reality of his DC tenure
View attachment 176774
View attachment 176772
View attachment 176773
I stated the metrics where we were top 3 in the original post. Then showed other metrics against competition as you changed your point.Lol...
No "Pal"
First off...I wouldn't consider two #13 ratings as "elite"....I mean you were telling me about all these "top 3s"...We weren't top 3. We were a good defense this year.
Secondly...FEI attempts to gauge how each team would do against a national "Average" team....It does not always translate when stepping up in class, even though it attempts to
I stated the metrics where we were top 3 in the original post. Then showed other metrics against competition as you changed your point.
You're really hanging on to a irrelevant point in arguing that our best defense in nearly 20 years wasn't good enough for you.
Not gonna talk to a wall anymore, so carry on
No grandpa, I'll make a mental note that #8 defense is just plain average. Being top 3 in the nation in turnovers, sacks, tfl, 3rd down %, and ypp doesn't mean anything and that your personal opinion holds more weight than FEIYou're trying to tell me the defense was elite
I simply said it wasn't top 3 when you adjust for schedule....And I was correct. Any problems here, junior?
No grandpa, I'll make a mental note that #8 defense is just plain average. Being top 3 in the nation in turnovers, sacks, tfl, 3rd down %, and ypp doesn't mean anything and that your personal opinion holds more weight than FEI