Shalala Sponsoring a bill to limit coaching salaries

She sucks and ruined football here with this mindset, but wouldn't this be a plus for us? If every college was on the same playing field when it came to pay coaches wouldn't we benefit from this being a smaller school that doesn't have Bama or other big time money?
 
Advertisement
Here ya go Donald. I want you to read this very very slowly, so you really understand what's being discussed. Afterwards, let me know if you have any questions. Thanks

I call B.s. Mr. Marx. But don't let me stop your ignorant ways. Btw it's not Donald. It's your "Daddy " refer to me properly next time.
 
Advertisement

If anyone thought she wasn’t sabotaging UM football.

And if anyone this troll needs to consult with, its coach shannon, he's already real familiar with this bill. The troll low-balled that man and still tried and didnt want to pay him what was left on the contract. Anything to do with the castration process, that troll is all in, i bet that troll wont try and sponsor a bill to cap off women's sports/coaches salaries. Their are only 3 women's sports that i can watch and enjoy them seriously and get hype, that's women's track & field, tennis and volleyball, after that, i have little interest in the other sports.
 
I'm w her as it applies to public colleges. Public Universities should only be able to pay coaches a certain amount from tax payer funds. Theres no reason why the HC of the states main public university should be the highest paid public employee in the state.

Funds and benefits from boosters however should be unlimited. If a university wants to pay their coach 20 mill a season that's fine, but it needs to come from private sources. My opinion anyway.
 
I'm w her as it applies to public colleges. Public Universities should only be able to pay coaches a certain amount from tax payer funds. Theres no reason why the HC of the states main public university should be the highest paid public employee in the state.

Funds and benefits from boosters however should be unlimited. If a university wants to pay their coach 20 mill a season that's fine, but it needs to come from private sources. My opinion anyway.
I dont think coaches salaries come from tax dollars, not typically. The athletic department flips those bills.
 
Advertisement
The original purpose of state universities when they were founded was to provide the public with access to a low cost, quality public education. Prior to the establishment of the state university systems, the country had all private universities that were typically attended by wealthy people. There was very little social mobility. The state universities were an attempt to remedy that.

I disagree with your views of the purpose of a state university. The purpose of a state university is not to be a bastion of progressive thought- however, that's what they have turned into through leftist professors. The state university is supposed to be a bastion of free thought, which is not the same as progressive thought.

Ultimately that's not really pertinent to my point which is that the federal government has a duty to the taxpayers to ensure that federal funds are being spent wisely. I don't think that coaching salaries should be capped simply because they are making too much money. However, if the fact that universities are paying coaching staffs millions of dollars is causing tuitions to be higher than they would otherwise be and schools are not controlling their own costs, the federal government has every right to set conditions on the universities to receive federal taxpayer money. Again, state university systems can freely decide to forgo the federal funds and pass the costs onto the students or the state taxpayer. It's like the recruiting example I gave above. Many state universities openly embraced anti-military neo-marxist students and professors that would harrass military recruiters, right up until the federal government set conditions and told universities that they HAD to provide access or they would lose funds. And wouldn't you know it, state schools suddenly became much more military friendly.

Lastly- my support of the cap only goes for public non profit universities. I don't believe it should apply to private non profits. Since private universities are not taxpayer funded, the federal government does not have an interest in their tuition costs or the amount being paid to coaches. The biggest winners will be Miami, USC, and Notre Dame.

Agreed. I'm not saying that public flagship schools SHOULD be a bastion of progressive thought as my opinion. I think that's how they're viewed, now, by their trustees and administrators. There's a lot of incest in people graduating from state schools going on to become state administrators. Look at the debacle with Pam Bondi (who is an utter disaster to begin with) and Jameis Winston. But further, to your point, maybe they just have too much **** money? There are basically three ways they're teaching these wildly irrelevant classes now:

1) They already had too much money and they allocated it to something stupid,
2) They said they didn't have enough and needed more, said what they needed it for and went to the state for budgetary purposes (not sure how that process works), OR
3) Some rich person donated money specifically to endow that type of class.

These brings me back to my initial points as to how limiting specifically the HC salary is idiotic. The money is the problem, and money can always be reallocated in myriad creative ways. It's like tax law. Some pencil pusher will say "you can't do this," so some dude with three degrees from Yale goes "OK, then we'll do that instead."
 
Advertisement
This isn’t really a Left or Right issue.

The explosion of Federal money into state and private schools since the Seventies has led to spiraling salaries, costs, and tuition. It’s a huge racket, based on the inflationary principle of too much money chasing after too few goods.

In a rational universe, textbooks shouldn’t cost 150.00. Nick Saban shouldn’t pull down 7 million so Dabo can kick his a$$, but he does.

Our private university has to go hat in hand to the BOT so we can compete with big state schools for good Assistant Coaches because of this entire process.

If Shalala’s bill were to become law, all that would happen is that the Boosters at Bama and Clemson would find compensation packages that would be tailored to the law.

Everything about this.

Except I'd love to have paid $150 for textbooks. My accounting books almost 20 years ago were over $200 a piece.
 
How about term limits for these idiots in congress that have nothing better to do than come up with countless new ways to micromanage everyone else's lives?

How about forced economics education to keep people who don't understand how it works from having an opinion on it?
 
Advertisement
Highest Paid College Football Coaches

0 Private Schools in the Top 10.
2 Private Schools in the Top 20.
6 Private Schools in the Top 50.

You're right. Socialism is ruining college football. Just not in the way that you think.


That’s because private schools aren’t required to release salaries.

I don’t think anybody really knows what Diaz and his staff are making. It was pretty widely known that Shannon and Golden were getting a pittance to pay assistants. Richt and now Diaz have gotten the admin to dish out more money. And Diaz is still flopping.
 
Would think Private schools would be exempt. Hence the word Private.

they’ll tie it to “federal funding” or “federal grants” to enforce.

I don’t mind if say the Florida legislature did something wrt state tax dollars at state institutions.

but there can’t be limits on spending from privately funded sources
 
how?? Unless it’s implemented nationally that would put all Florida schools at a disadvantage.

I'm operating under the assumption it would be implemented nationally.

This isn't the first time such legislation has been proposed, but doing it at a state level would be completely idiotic.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top