- Joined
- Dec 22, 2011
- Messages
- 54,756
Frenk is probably more liberal personally than Shalala so the blanket argument that all Donna vitriol is politically based doesn't hold water. Sure, it's obviously a factor with some (as it is with some of her defenders) but it's certainly not an end-all-be-all.
And to keep poo-poo'ing any validity in the University of Miami having political and public relations sway when it WANTS to exercise it is disingenuous at best.
I'm personally checking out of this one though as it's about the 1000th time this topic has been broached. Shame on Donna for bringing it back up just to serve he current and never-ending political ambitions. Thank God (and Stevie Ross), we finally have a real stadium.
It's not a question of liberal. Bernie Sanders is liberal, but people don't blame him for everything that goes wrong at UM.
It is Donna's long-time association with the Clintons. And, yes, "hating" the Clintons is very political.
Also, please go back and re-read what I wrote. I am not saying that UM does not have political and PR sway. I am saying two things, and both are valid. First, you don't use your "public relations machine" to jump into issues where you have no ownership. And second, even if I agreed with you, IT JUST DIDN'T MATTER. From a public relations standpoint, the public vote to renovate the Orange Bowl was a smashing success. It passed.
Again, as I have asked of others, BE SPECIFIC about what Shalala could have or should have done to prevent a handful of Miami politicians from spurning a SIGNED CONTRACT WITH HAMMES. The deal was done. The deal was signed. The Latin Builders Association and Jeffrey Loria worked behind the scenes to pressure Miami politicians to incur millions of dollars in legal fees and penalties to repudiate a SIGNED CONTRACT.
Just BE SPECIFIC about how anyone, or any "public relations machine", can change THAT ONE FACT.
