- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
- Messages
- 5,583
So we're unproductive, getting negative recruited, and are losing kids left and right, but the ESPN alert three minutes ago says we have the #3 class.
Fair or not it’s his narrative. Once it exists it’s hard to shake. I’m sure he’s heard it. I’m not convinced he thinks he needs to shake itI said last year there was a narrative on Mario in football circles, him
and his offenses were already getting negative recruited and it’s even worse now. I know for an absolute fact kids went elsewhere for less NIL to play in better systems. And I’m not just talking the obvious one.
You have to be right, because how in the world could the opposite be true? Our games were unwatchable. I'm apparently and sadly stuck being a fan. A hs recruit or transfer isn't.I said last year there was a narrative on Mario in football circles, him
and his offenses were already getting negative recruited and it’s even worse now. I know for an absolute fact kids went elsewhere for less NIL to play in better systems. And I’m not just talking the obvious one.
I don't see how a neutral observer couldn't conclude that his stubborness isn't an issue. You going to change some or think 25 offensive guys are going to magically change?Fair or not it’s his narrative. Once it exists it’s hard to shake. I’m sure he’s heard it. I’m not convinced he thinks he needs to shake it
That aggregate statistic tell you nothing about the non oline offense recruitment, which is MC driven. You remind me of the 6 foot tall statisticisn who drowned in a river averaging 5 feet.So we're unproductive, getting negative recruited, and are losing kids left and right, but the ESPN alert three minutes ago says we have the #3 class.
Mario comes off as stubborn to everyone who wasn’t an oregon or Miami fan. So yeah when he gives off stubborn with no substance behind it you get WR’s running from you as fast they can. It’s actually been quite alarmingI don't see how a neutral observer couldn't conclude that his stubborness isn't an issue. You going to change some or think 25 offensive guys are going to magically change?
That aggregate statistic tell you nothing about the non oline offense recruitment, which is MC driven. You remind me of the 6 foot tall statisticisn who drowned in a river averaging 5 feet.
And my question to everyone is what vision can Mario Cristobal sell you to come here if you’re a top 100 WRUnless someone has unwavering faith in Mario and or TVD. It’s 100% a deal breaker. You spend 90% of your time in college with your position coach. If you’re a transfer you know the deal. Gambling on your position coach is like gambling with your life
It’s bait friend , just ignore.That aggregate statistic tell you nothing about the non oline offense recruitment, which is MC driven. You remind me of the 6 foot tall statisticisn who drowned in a river averaging 5 feet.
It’s bait friend , just ignore.
Then that is a Mario issue whether fair assessment or not. What does it matter who the OC is if they are running Mario's system? I do know this: running backs, tes, and oline seem to love it.I said last year there was a narrative on Mario in football circles, him
and his offenses were already getting negative recruited and it’s even worse now. I know for an absolute fact kids went elsewhere for less NIL to play in better systems. And I’m not just talking the obvious one.
Smart take…Just been thinking about this a little more and the fact we are not getting any outside wrs this cycle supposedly because our OC situation is in limbo. Are we making too big a deal of this? And are recruits making a mistake committing to position coaches and not so much the head guy?
We know each year position coaches usually get shuffled or get promoted to other programs. They tend to have shorter term contracts so longevity is always a question.
Kids, imo, should really be committing to the head guy and his vision. He is the one that likely will be around the next 4 years while a position coach is not guaranteed a spot for more than maybe 1-2 years. Maybe that is what Mario is thinking and selling. There's always exceptions but even a guy like Hartline who is the best in the biz was rumored for a HC position this year and will likely be rumored every year vacancies occur. So if I commit to OSU to be coached by Hartline in the back of my mind I am thinking the guy may be gone before I graduate. The program I commit to better have more going for it than just my position coach or I will end up disappointed.
So in the end if I commit to the head guy it is because I trust the head guy, his vision for the program, and that he will be competent enough to hire competent assistants to develop me. I don't necessarily need to know who my position coach (or OC) is. Maybe nice if I do, but should not be the deal breaker as long as I am good with the head guy.
Dudes talk out of both sides of their mouths.Then that is a Mario issue whether fair assessment or not. What does it matter who the OC is if they are running Mario's system? I do know this: running backs, tes, and oline seem to love it.
Rb’s and OL should want to play play for him.Then that is a Mario issue whether fair assessment or not. What does it matter who the OC is if they are running Mario's system? I do know this: running backs, tes, and oline seem to love it.
Fair or not it’s his narrative. Once it exists it’s hard to shake. I’m sure he’s heard it. I’m not convinced he thinks he needs to shake it
It’s bait because you’re the oldest troll on the board and have a scouting report of trying to take the skip Bayless approach to get attention. Now get back to trolling Jagr.Is it bait, or is it a point that "Cribby" can't refute?