hoops156
Senior
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2011
- Messages
- 30,550
The reason why you can’t understand that is because it’s not true. First time they took fewer than 20 was 2017 - after they’d already won a chip.
PS - they took 29 last year. 15 3 stars.
facts
The reason why you can’t understand that is because it’s not true. First time they took fewer than 20 was 2017 - after they’d already won a chip.
PS - they took 29 last year. 15 3 stars.
They actually had a lot of top guys, their classes just didn't look as good as a whole bc they would take like 17 guys most cycles.
a good amount of these guys will end up 4 stars to be fair. Let their senior seasons play out.Here comes the "most of our commits should be 4 stars" or the "rankings don't matter" porst.
Personally I’d rather our class look how are storm 18 class looked in the summer of 2017 but this is a process. As long as the blue chip ratio ends up over 50% then it’s more than fine honestly this year.Amazing we’re neck and neck in rankings with a Florida school that won 10 games despite some dudes being undervalued in our class.It’s june and we got over half of the class committed and a way better qb imo. And yes fck them I won’t be happy with a close win regardless of the reasons why it should be.
Theyd take more some cycles, but usually 2 out of every 4 years the class would be pretty small.What I don't understand is how do they ever get close to the 85 man roster taking only 17-18 a year? Are the cloning people?
Just doing the math 17 x 5 = 85, it's as if they redshirt everyone and no one leaves early for the draft. How is that even possible these days?
Ok, what I said was taken a little too literally, they usually sat around 20-22, but the point was their numbers would typically be lower than most. Theyd usually go in that range 3 out of 4 years, then have one class that had like 30. My bad.The reason why you can’t understand that is because it’s not true. First time they took fewer than 20 was 2017 - after they’d already won a chip.
PS - they took 29 last year. 15 3 stars.
Fine, I guess, but that sort of neuters the whole "only reason why Clemson didn't average a top 10 class is because they only take 17 guys a year" argument.Ok, what I said was taken a little too literally, they usually sat around 20-22, but the point was their numbers would typically be lower than most. Theyd usually go in that range 3 out of 4 years, then have one class that had like 30. My bad.
They did and in fact, they wanted Dabo gone bc he kept losing to SCAR.Fine, I guess, but that sort of neuters the whole "only reason why Clemson didn't average a top 10 class is because they only take 17 guys a year" argument.
Clemson was not a recruiting juggernaut until after dabo got his first ring... 7 or 8 (I think) years into his tenure. And I'm sure a lot of people up in south cackalack wanted to throw the baby out with the bath water after geno smith scored 9,000 points on him in that orange bowl. Just saying.
There are a few obvious ones who are underrated though especially Elijah Roberts and Quentin Williams.
Let’s see how the season pans out. How often have we been #1 - 5 to start the season & we falter? UF may experience the same thing.
Furthermore, just so we’re clear, we’re only 8th b/c of the amount of commits. Florida is 6th due to the amount of commits and blue chips in their class. They’re are at a 50/50 blue chip/commit ratio right now. We’re at a 36/64 blue chip/commit ratio right now. Some of our 3 stars will be bumped, and that will bump our rankings. I also feel some of UF’s 4star guys are borderline. They got two guys that can drop a star at any moment, and another guy who’s flip bait for UT or A&M.
At the end of the day, today don’t mean chit. Let’s see how this season pans out & we’ll see if we can close strong for the future.
They had a crazy good oline class last cycle they picked up 4 4 stars along the oline but *****’emThe gaytors actually appear to have a strong DLine class committed. Maybe good at LB as well. Where they’re shîtting the bed is on the OL and at RB. I’m not certain how they’re looking at DB.
It feels like the same type of discussion about which of our players get bumps. The only difference is that they do it repeatedly. It’s not really a focus from our posters.Is this the thread that da Gaytor version of RVA uses for Canes Tears?
It feels like the same type of discussion about which of our players get bumps. The only difference is that they do it repeatedly. It’s not really a focus from our posters.