skillydoo
Junior
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2015
- Messages
- 2,447
Oh how I wish we had grabbed an RB from the portal....this one stands out, wonder if he has issues?
David Bailey
Thad Franklin says hi.
Oh how I wish we had grabbed an RB from the portal....this one stands out, wonder if he has issues?
David Bailey
Like we are in great shape at RB. Chaney will be coming off injury and be better than ever. King will be a running threat coming off surgery and recruits will take up the slack. Can't find any official stats on yesterday but we certainly didn't seem very threatening against our own defense that let NC embarrass us, oh, I forgot Diaz is the DC now therefore our defense was awesome yesterday against the run. Sorry but Alabama MIGHT have some offensive issues against us but their defense is their strength and a powerful back like Bailey just MIGHT up our chances just in case things go go as optimistic as planned. How dare I question our RB depth.
I'm stealing that for my tagline.When I see a Fraggle authored thread, my hand trembles in joyous anticipation as I lower my finger to click on the header while my brain cells long to absorb those plump morsels of wisdom and mirth.
We have 5 RB's on the roster including Burns (?) and a walkon. To expect a new entry RB to be ready for Bama is a reach. Also injuries don't always recover and those returning need to get in condition and prepare fully.
From 247: "That means a three-man competition at running back between Chaney, Cam’Ron Harris, and Jaylan Knighton is now down to two. "
We have our leading RB back, great, a 600 yard RB. Throw in the fact we had no legitimate TE's for spring so blocking schemes that include TE's have not been practiced.
Butch always had a room full of RB's and used them all. I hope at least one of our RB's is comparable to Butch's RBs.
With wide receivers like Pope and Wiggins, we wont need to run the ball.
Oh my gosh...... my mind was not ready for this. And I can’t unsee it.
I disagree with the OP about a transfer. Our RB situation is good and a strength. A transfer RB isn't needed.
That being said - I can see the "This is our best backfield since 2001" hype train has left the building, and there are no brakes. Posters be damned if you say anything critical about our RB's.
I hope there's a faction that understands we might have a collection of good RB's, but none that are great/special (fingers crossed on Chaney).
Will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Did he forget about the transfer from UT? We have a stable of backs. Just need the OL to block and we are golden.
This is just another one of those ridiculous "I keep it real-er than anyone else, because I say CRITICAL things about our players" nonsense posts.
Nobody is "damned" for saying anything "critical" about our RBs.
We are just pointing out the whining overreaction about "desperately seeking Portal help" when we have our Top 3 RBs back (yes, one has a minor shoulder issue) AND we are adding two sizeable 4-star freshmen. And I'm not sure how taking a Portal RB (or FIVE Portal RBs) will fix D'Eriq King.
That is all. If anything, we should be BETTER at RB than we were last year. That does not mean we have anointed the RB room as "best ever" or "best since 2001". But, honestly, which of those 5 guys is Dyral McMillan or Nick Williams or Jarrett Payton or Jason Geathers? Beyond our Top 2 or 3 best RBs, we have normally had a big drop-off, but we have five legitimate threats once the freshmen arrive.
As people have pointed out, RB is one of the easiest positions to plug-and-play a freshman (assuming that Soldinger is no longer keeping them off the field for lack of pass-blocking skills).
So we should bring in a SIXTH blue-chip running back because Chaney has a minor shoulder issue?
Man, 225 times a game? We're going to break the record for most plays by a wide, wide margin.I agreed there's no reason to add a transfer. We have plenty of depth and good players at RB.
What I'm saying is I can tell fans are thinking we have more juice at RB than we actually do. And I can see the backlash coming.
I think "Depth" and being "Better" is skewing away from the most important question which is - how good is our starter?
If we don't have a starter on the level of a Lamar Miller/Duke Johnson that we can give the ball 225+ times a game to, then what does it matter if our 4th-6th RB is better than it usually is? Forget the Butch backfields - they shouldn't even be mentioned.
Right now we're hoping Chaney can reach the Miller/Duke level but have no evidence of that yet and the shoulder is a setback. Cam & Knighton aren't that level.