2016 Richt had 15 years of SEC head coaching experience. He didn’t exist in a vacuum. But I think I answered your question. His first two years at UM were unquestionably better than Mario’s. He won the coastal and was coach of the year at UM. So what’s the punchline?
No, u’re using a lot of fillers vs. answering yes or no. The 15 yrs of experience is a moot point, b/c
-UGA was trying to fire him for 3 straight seasons
-By the time he came here, he was a complete shell of his former self due to health reason.
Nevertheless, this is a quote u made:
“Some people seem strangely oblivious to the state of the program that Mario inherited despite having witnessed it unraveling for 20+ years. They're looking only at the tip of the iceberg. For a long time we have been miles away from the Alabama's and OSU's of the world in every possible respect. Not even close. Our program infrastructure was ostensibly a joke compared to what is occurring at big time programs”
That’s an interesting statement; it’s one that I, myself, once used to support & justify Mario’s 1st season. However, here’s why that’s a strawman’s argument, in particular to this current situation:
1. We’re not competing against The Bama’s & OSU’s of the world; we’re competing against The Pitt’s, UNC’s, UVA’s, VA Tech’s, GT’s, & Duke’s of the world, so a moot point.
2. The deterioration of this program has been, in large part, to ****** coaching hires. I won’t criticize the Coker hire, too, much, b/c a lot of teams tend to hire in-house from a successful coach’s branch for continuity. HOWEVER, every coaching hire thereafter could absolutely be ridiculed and criticized. We’ve had the talent to not only compete in the ACC, but dominate the Coastal.
3. Mark Richt proves this conjecture is bull ****. He had to come behind both Randy Shannon, AND a mid-season fired Al Golden’s squad, but was IMMEDIATELY successful as a washed up coach past his prime.
4. Despite 20 yrs of futility, The University of Miami produced just as many NFL draft picks from 2018-2021 as Mario Cristobal did, which meant the rhetoric was, we didn’t have a talent issue, but rather a coaching and development issue. Hence, this is why we through a bag at Mario
At this point, there’s literally no viable excuse available to reason what’s transpiring. Mario has been given absolutely everything he’s asked for, so what’s the point of bringing up 20 years, when he’s been underperforming:
Shannon: 12-11 after 23 games
Golden: 12-11 after 23 games
Richt: 19-4 after 23 games
Diaz: 14-9 after 23 games
Cristobal: 11-12 after 23 games
It’s unfathomable that a coach, where our entire boosters have put their financial weight behind, struggle this mightily compared to a group of guys who didn’t remotely get the same support. Richt completely blows the 20 yr excuse out of the water.