scrantoncane
Sophomore
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 3,195
My answer to this specific question would be that, the best guy to lead you back from down XYZ points at half is not necessarily the guy that gives you the best chance to win.So then explain why Nick Saban felt Hurts was not the right guy to win a national championship and Tagovailoa was (which proved true), but now the very next season with no intervening games in between, he suddenly feels Hurts is once again the guy who should start?
You honestly don't think seniority has anything to do with that? The fact he doesn't want Hurts to transfer? The fact Hurts brings leadership and other qualities that - although they would not have translated to a win in the national championship -- they benefit the team?
At the end of the day, I don't care who wins as long as he's the best QB on the roster. I simply question if CMR has the cojones to do that which no one on this board can cite a single example of: redshirt senior incumbent starting QB getting benched for the opener in favor of a freshman (injury/discipline aside). Never been done before and it's myopic to think that in the history of CFB it was invariably because the redshirt senior QB was "better".
Hurts can't sling it up and down the field and score points in a hurry. So for the same reason you put Bird, Curry and Reggie Miller on the court when you are down 3 with 2 seconds to go (and not Kareem, Shaq and Duncan), is the same reason Saban went with Tua over Hurts.
I'm with the crew that thinks Malik doesn't have anything locked up yet. I don't see how anyone that watched him last year can think otherwise.