The punishment is excessive as **** and has NOTHING to do with teaching integrity. And whose “integrity” at that? Firing all the coaches? Yes. Disbanding the team? Stupid and unfair and only proves that punishments only flow towards those ill-equipped financially to fight it.
As I always say,
@OriginalGatorHater is heavy-handed as **** (an occupational hazard if he doesn’t think that way) … but he ain’t wrong! The world is NOT a meritocracy and good guys do finish last (read up on David Sarnoff and how he built RCA/NBC…).
separately, I read this article a while back (yeah, it’s huffington post, get over it)
Elites are finding more ways to ensure that their children never run out of chances to fail.
www.huffpost.com
…Zach Dell is the son of billionaire tech magnate Michael Dell. Though he
told reporters that he wasn’t relying on family money, Thread’s early
investors included a number of his father’s friends, including Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff.
The app failed almost instantly. Perhaps the number of monogamy-seeking students just wasn’t large enough, or capping users at 10 matches per day limited the app’s addictiveness. It could also have been the mismatch between Thread’s chaste motto and its user experience. Users got just 70 characters to describe themselves on their profiles. Most of them resorted to
catchphrases like “Hook ’em” and “Netflix is life.”
After Thread went bust, Dell moved into philanthropy with a startup called Sqwatt, which
promised to deliver “low-cost sanitation solutions for the developing world.” Aside from an
empty website and a
promotional video with fewer than 100 views, the effort seems to have disappeared.
And yet, despite helming two failed ventures and having little work experience beyond an internship at a financial services company created to manage his father’s fortune, things seem to be working out for Zach Dell. According to his LinkedIn profile, he is now an analyst for the private equity firm Blackstone. He is 22.
America has a social mobility problem. Children born in 1940 had a
90% chance of earning more than their parents. For children born in 1984, the odds were 50-50.
Most accounts of this trend focus on the breakdown of
upward mobility: It’s getting harder for the poor to become rich. But equally important is the decline of
downward mobility: The rich, regardless of their intelligence, are becoming more likely to stay that way.
…But billionaire heirs are only a tiny part of the problem. Over the last 30 years, nearly every institution of social mobility, from education to work to government spending, has been systematically tilted toward the wealthy.
Rather than sending our most brilliant minds up the income ladder, America is ensuring that the wealthy, no matter their mediocrity, retain their grip on the highest rung.
…
Last month, a Duke University study revealed that 43% of white Harvard students were not admitted on merit. They were ALDCs: recruited athletes, legacies, students on the dean’s interest list, and children of faculty and staff. The “dean’s interest list” is a roster of applicants with ties to wealthy donors.
…
Over the last 20 years, selective universities have become just as dominated by the wealthy as the elite colleges — while receiving a fraction of the attention. Notre Dame, the University of North Carolina and the University of Southern California, for example, admit higher percentages of legacy students than Princeton. Thirty-eight colleges — including upper-crust mainstays Colgate and Tufts — admit more students from the top 1% than from the bottom 60%. At Washington University in St. Louis, the worst offender, the ratio is 3-to-1.
“These aren’t just elite institutions, they’re elitist institutions,” Reeves said. “They end up serving the children of today’s elite rather than preparing tomorrow’s elite.”
Public colleges are subject to the same trend. In 2017, University of Georgia students had a
median family income of $129,800. Two-thirds of the students at the University of Michigan
came from the richest fifth of the income distribution; just 1 in 30 came from the poorest fifth.
Everyone knows this to be true; and one of the reasons why immigrants are so successful is that they don’t see many of the “obstacles”, rules and inhibitors that hold back native-born. Interestingly enough, another successful group that doesn’t see the “inhibitors“…ironically the dyslexic.