- Joined
- Oct 2, 2017
- Messages
- 8,620
Be careful what you wish for.
Don't think that's right. The decision is the NCAA can't ban those types of payments or benefits, not that the schools have to do any of that. You will be at a competitive disadvantage if you don't, but from what I have seen schools are not compelled to. Now, if every school does not change anything, that may spur a second anti-trust lawsuit, but that is a different story.
Some schools may want to. Plus, some of the expenses are funny money anyways. Like tuition for graduate school. It's nonsense. There are no unit costs to another person in an MBA program. You aren't hiring more professors for that one person or buying more desks for them.I meant that “can” could be construed to mean they actually want to when the polar opposite is the truth.
Unfortunately those dopes extended him recently
https://www.cbssports.com/college-b...-should-draw-disappointment-but-not-surprise/
Correct. Basically schools have greater flexibility to give students when they need to complete their education. This has nothing to do with paying players for NIL.Don't think that's right. The decision is the NCAA can't ban those types of payments or benefits, not that the schools have to do any of that. You will be at a competitive disadvantage if you don't, but from what I have seen schools are not compelled to. Now, if every school does not change anything, that may spur a second anti-trust lawsuit, but that is a different story.
A childhood friend is an AD (yes you've heard of the school, no they aren't a big power). Here is their take on today's ruling (apparently much broader $$$ impact to smaller schools than bigger):All this means is schools can pay players more.
As I understand, this case focuses on COA vs GIA $$$ determinations.Correct. Basically schools have greater flexibility to give students when they need to complete their education. This has nothing to do with paying players for NIL.
So how does this benefit the University of Miami?Supreme Court rules against NCAA, opening door to significant increase in compensation for student athletes
A unanimous Supreme Court said on Monday that student athletes could receive education-related payments, in a case that could reshape college sports by allowing more money from a billion-dollar industry to go to the players.www.cnn.com
FIFY.A great day for the SEC
Love it!!!Don't know if this helps or hurts Miami.... but I'm going with "helps."
If the NCAA / Emmert doesn't like it, then that means Alabama and the SEC don't like it, and that means I DO like it.