Coach Macho
aka Beardy Ryan
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2012
- Messages
- 13,413
4.5 is not fast for a 5'10" 180lb CB.
Sorry.
When they cash the checks, the bank teller doesn't ask what they ran in the 40.
Uh, okay.
4.5 is not fast for a 5'10" 180lb CB.
Sorry.
When they cash the checks, the bank teller doesn't ask what they ran in the 40.
4.5 is not fast for a 5'10" 180lb CB.
Sorry.
He definitely won't make the National Forty League. He'll have to settle for a 10 year career in the other NFL.
That's cool. Never said he wouldn't, just answered the poster who said 4.5 is plenty fast.
4.5 is not fast for a 5'10" 180lb CB.
Sorry.
He definitely won't make the National Forty League. He'll have to settle for a 10 year career in the other NFL.
The guy who stood out to me was Rayshawn Jenkins. I thought he was a round 5-6 type but that appears too low. He ran well and tested well. I've seen some rave reviews on Seahawk blogs. Some fans want Jenkins in round 3 as a result of his combine testing.
Those Seattle sites are easily the most sophisticated of any team in regard to SPARQ and other metric type analysis. They have figured out the Seahawk formulas in terms of the test results they prioritize at specific positions. Jenkins scored very highly and fits within the guidelines.
On the other end of the spectrum was Dalvin Cook. His test scores were so ghastly they fell within the 9th percentile in terms of NFL running backs. In other words, the league average is 50% and Cook is a 9% athlete on that scale. It won't scare off every team but some teams will downgrade him significantly.
I can't say I'm overly surprised because for all the raves Cook received on this site there were several runs, notably in 2015, in which Cook looked like a klutz and more or less tackled himself. There was no comparison in athletic ability between Cook and Christian McCaffrey. That was glaring in the 3 cone and short shuttle numbers, where McCaffrey dominated while Cook had pathetic numbers. I suppose it could be argued that Cook didn't take those tests seriously. If that's the case, genius maneuver in essentially a job interview process.
The guy who stood out to me was Rayshawn Jenkins. I thought he was a round 5-6 type but that appears too low. He ran well and tested well. I've seen some rave reviews on Seahawk blogs. Some fans want Jenkins in round 3 as a result of his combine testing.
Those Seattle sites are easily the most sophisticated of any team in regard to SPARQ and other metric type analysis. They have figured out the Seahawk formulas in terms of the test results they prioritize at specific positions. Jenkins scored very highly and fits within the guidelines.
On the other end of the spectrum was Dalvin Cook. His test scores were so ghastly they fell within the 9th percentile in terms of NFL running backs. In other words, the league average is 50% and Cook is a 9% athlete on that scale. It won't scare off every team but some teams will downgrade him significantly.
I can't say I'm overly surprised because for all the raves Cook received on this site there were several runs, notably in 2015, in which Cook looked like a klutz and more or less tackled himself. There was no comparison in athletic ability between Cook and Christian McCaffrey. That was glaring in the 3 cone and short shuttle numbers, where McCaffrey dominated while Cook had pathetic numbers. I suppose it could be argued that Cook didn't take those tests seriously. If that's the case, genius maneuver in essentially a job interview process.
If McCaffrey and Cook are both available when the Bucs pick at 19, who do you think they take? Also... Any insight insofar as what formulas Seattle uses or what measures are of most important by position (particularly if it differs from what is commonly known, like 10-yard time for d linemen)
The guy who stood out to me was Rayshawn Jenkins. I thought he was a round 5-6 type but that appears too low. He ran well and tested well. I've seen some rave reviews on Seahawk blogs. Some fans want Jenkins in round 3 as a result of his combine testing.
Those Seattle sites are easily the most sophisticated of any team in regard to SPARQ and other metric type analysis. They have figured out the Seahawk formulas in terms of the test results they prioritize at specific positions. Jenkins scored very highly and fits within the guidelines.
On the other end of the spectrum was Dalvin Cook. His test scores were so ghastly they fell within the 9th percentile in terms of NFL running backs. In other words, the league average is 50% and Cook is a 9% athlete on that scale. It won't scare off every team but some teams will downgrade him significantly.
I can't say I'm overly surprised because for all the raves Cook received on this site there were several runs, notably in 2015, in which Cook looked like a klutz and more or less tackled himself. There was no comparison in athletic ability between Cook and Christian McCaffrey. That was glaring in the 3 cone and short shuttle numbers, where McCaffrey dominated while Cook had pathetic numbers. I suppose it could be argued that Cook didn't take those tests seriously. If that's the case, genius maneuver in essentially a job interview process.
What were Bard Kaayak's numbers in the shuttle?
What were Bard Kaayak's numbers in the shuttle?
Hasn't finished yet.