MEGA New Miami Adidas Ultraboost🔥 - The Shoe and Nike/Adidas Thread.

Seriously, dude won nothing at that school, yet his logo and signature are all over the uniforms. His logo is in the gloves, smh..
He's by far their most famous alum. It's not particularly close. Him being the best player in program history is WHY his logo is on the uniforms. This isn't Michael Jordan, a guy who was fortunate enough to sign with a school that was consistently in the title picture BEFORE he got there, and continues to be. TTU was a nothing program before Mahomes, and will likely always be a second tier program, no matter how much NIL money they throw around. I have no problem with this, no QB can win a title by themselves.
 
He's by far their most famous alum. It's not particularly close. Him being the best player in program history is WHY his logo is on the uniforms. This isn't Michael Jordan, a guy who was fortunate enough to sign with a school that was consistently in the title picture BEFORE he got there, and continues to be. TTU was a nothing program before Mahomes, and will likely always be a second tier program, no matter how much NIL money they throw around. I have no problem with this, no QB can win a title by themselves.
Michael Crabtree won back to back Biletnikoff awards.
Possibly had the a top 2-4 greatest statistical season of a WR ever: 1,962 yards and 22 TDs in 13 games (150 Y/G). I mean Devonta Smith winning Heisman and doing similar while at Bama is definitely greater. Jamarr Chase too. And Tory Edwards had the actual greatest at 1,996 yards and 27 TDs and another 3 TDs and 227 yards rushing (But at LaTech)... oh and that was coming off of 1,707 yards and 13 TDs lol
 
Last edited:
Michael Crabtree won back to back Biletnikoff awards.
Possibly had the a top 2-4 greatest statistical season of a WR ever: 1,962 yards and 22 TDs in 13 games (150 Y/G). I mean Devonta Smith winning Heisman and doing similar while at Bama is definitely greater. Jamarr Chase too. And Tory Edwards had the actual greatest at 1,996 yards and 27 TDs and another 3 TDs and 227 yards rushing (But at LaTech)... oh and that was coming off of 1,707 yards and 13 TDs lol
And Crabtree is STILL a nobody compared to Mahomes. Mahomes is a shoo in for the PFHOF. The only thing that will keep him out of the CFBHOF is him not being a first team all American(Lamar Jackson was unanimous in 2017) I doubt his inability to overcome playing for Kliff Kingsbury will be held against him as a college QB.

There’s a good chance Pat will be a Top 5 QB ALL TIME by the time he retires.

Crabtree was a great college receiver but he wasn’t the phenomenon Mahomes has turned out to be. The gap between the two players is huge, which is more a statement on Pat’s dominance than anything else.
 
So just to prove I don't hate Nike fam, I picked up these zoom structure 24s at the premium outlet for 45 bucks. After I had a few meetings I was right next to outlet and there were the best deal in the outlet mall. Nice and classy look, very comfortable.
View attachment 370200



1787332533952.png

IMG_0886.jpeg
 
He's by far their most famous alum. It's not particularly close. Him being the best player in program history is WHY his logo is on the uniforms. This isn't Michael Jordan, a guy who was fortunate enough to sign with a school that was consistently in the title picture BEFORE he got there, and continues to be. TTU was a nothing program before Mahomes, and will likely always be a second tier program, no matter how much NIL money they throw around. I have no problem with this, no QB can win a title by themselves.

I’m sure u don’t, fan boy. This mutha fcka said MJ was fortunate to go to a school….a school that never won **** until he hit the game winning shot, & is by far the most influential athlete in the history across ALL sports.

U literally can’t make up some ****.
 
What say u all based upon this graphic


Miami obviously should've been on the list. It's a but disappointing because I actually love the trefoil logo.

For the shoe agnostic ones, there are a couple cheap Adidas shoes that you can match with Canes gear. I personally wouldn't use them for running or anytbing like that, but they're good for walking around in and matching for the season


 
@Rellyrell peep the back of the Tennessee jersey. The material between the two panels is the same as the front, unlike the mesh material they used for the canes and other teams last year. I hope Miami gets this refresh to this updated chassis for all jerseys too cause the current ones fit too loose. The fit and finish on Miami’s jerseys overall is lacking.
Glad to see you know what you’re looking at also. Doesn’t seem there are many in this thread/fanbase even though the differences in uniform quality are like I said a few pages back, minor league compared to 1st ballot HOF
 
Well UNC did win a Championship in 1956, Then finished top 16 in 17 out of the next 24 seasons (71%) before Jordan. Finished Top 10 in 11/24 seasons (46%), and Played (and lost) in 3 National Championship Games - including the year before Jordan got there.

But the context is also that John Wooden was at UCLA during this period until 1974 where he won 10 Championships... So they weren't going to win a Championship regardless.
 
Well UNC did win a Championship in 1956, Then finished top 16 in 17 out of the next 24 seasons (71%) before Jordan. Finished Top 10 in 11/24 seasons (46%), and Played (and lost) in 3 National Championship Games - including the year before Jordan got there.

But the context is also that John Wooden was at UCLA during this period until 1974 where he won 10 Championships... So they weren't going to win a Championship regardless.


Yeah, let's count all the segregation-era titles and all the times when the competition level was lower...

Good lord, the garbage you come up with when you refuse to admit you were wrong, and you double down on ****.

You know, Yale used to be pretty good at football too.
 
Yeah, let's count all the segregation-era titles and all the times when the competition level was lower...

Good lord, the garbage you come up with when you refuse to admit you were wrong, and you double down on ****.

You know, Yale used to be pretty good at football too.
I wasn't even involved in the original conversation lol, so how would I be refusing to admit I was wrong or doubling down
The response was literally that UNC had never won anything pre-jordan. You submitted the ******* wiki article lol. I just posted the actual Numbers of their APpoll finishes. You just chose to leave off the yr they won the national championship in the image as well...

Yale? Lol, that was pre 1910s
 
I wasn't even involved in the original conversation lol, so how would I be refusing to admit I was wrong or doubling down
The response was literally that UNC had never won anything pre-jordan. You submitted the ******* wiki article lol. I just posted the actual Numbers of their APpoll finishes. You just chose to leave off the yr they won the national championship in the image as well...

Yale? Lol, that was pre 1910s


Oh, yeah, I was trying to be selective...give me a ******* break. I posted as much as I could from the Dean Smith era, which actually pre-dated the modern Division I basketball history.

Again, when Jordan joined UNC, they had not effectively won ****, at least not while black players were allowed to be on the same court as white players.
 
Oh, yeah, I was trying to be selective...give me a ******* break. I posted as much as I could from the Dean Smith era, which actually pre-dated the modern Division I basketball history.

Again, when Jordan joined UNC, they had not effectively won ****, at least not while black players were allowed to be on the same court as white players.
So is you're ENTIRE comment about me saying they won a championship in 1956? lol
 
Well UNC did win a Championship in 1956, Then finished top 16 in 17 out of the next 24 seasons (71%) before Jordan. Finished Top 10 in 11/24 seasons (46%), and Played (and lost) in 3 National Championship Games - including the year before Jordan got there.

But the context is also that John Wooden was at UCLA during this period until 1974 where he won 10 Championships... So they weren't going to win a Championship regardless.
Why are you wasting your time with this nonsense? It's obvious some people on this board read to argue, not comprehend. UNC has been a power in college basketball for the better part of 70 years. Ring culture has ruined sports discourse, because people don't understand that there are tons of very good to elite entities that have consistently competed for titles, despite not having a billion rings. Context matters. UNC under Dean Smith was as good as there was, period. Anyone trying to argue otherwise isn't a serious person.

I was merely making a comparison between TTU and UNC, as in, TTU wasn't all that great before Mahomes, so his star power is magnified as a result. You can easily make the argument that Jordan wasn't even the best UNC player ever, their history is that **** deep, they have had so many outstanding players, players that won championships and made multiple Final Four runs. It's different when you are part of a machine, compared to being the unquestioned star.

People ignore the fact that Michael Jordan wasn't always the end all be all in regards to basketball players, there was a time when people could have legit arguments about him not being unquestioned GOAT at every level. Honestly, you can still have those arguments, as long as people like Bill Russell, and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar exist.
 
Why are you wasting your time with this nonsense? It's obvious some people on this board read to argue, not comprehend. UNC has been a power in college basketball for the better part of 70 years. Ring culture has ruined sports discourse, because people don't understand that there are tons of very good to elite entities that have consistently competed for titles, despite not having a billion rings. Context matters. UNC under Dean Smith was as good as there was, period. Anyone trying to argue otherwise isn't a serious person.

I was merely making a comparison between TTU and UNC, as in, TTU wasn't all that great before Mahomes, so his star power is magnified as a result. You can easily make the argument that Jordan wasn't even the best UNC player ever, their history is that **** deep, they have had so many outstanding players, players that won championships and made multiple Final Four runs. It's different when you are part of a machine, compared to being the unquestioned star.

People ignore the fact that Michael Jordan wasn't always the end all be all in regards to basketball players, there was a time when people could have legit arguments about him not being unquestioned GOAT at every level. Honestly, you can still have those arguments, as long as people like Bill Russell, and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar exist.
Texas Tech:
•Mahomes: 16-21 record at TTU, 11k+ yrds, 93 TDs & 29 ints.
•Harrell: 28-11 record at TTU, 15k+ yrds, 130+ TDs & 34 ints.

Do u know the difference between Mahomes reputation at TTU vs. Graham’s rep? NFL success & ring culture. Lol.

We’re talking about a player’s name being on a college team’s jersey, or did u forget the premise? Michael Jordan is not just important to UNC, he’s important to shoe culture in general. No Michael Jordan, & there’s no Patrick Mahomes, Kobe’s, LeBron’s, etc. More importantly, if there’s no Jordan, then Nike doesn’t exist as it is. So the POINT was, if Jordan doesn’t have his name on the back of helmets & jerseys as a brand sponsor, including his own alma mater, then y in TF would Mahomes?

I’m amazed every time I come on CIS at the level of contradictions ppl can post in a single response. This **** said ring culture has ruined sports, while simultaneously admitting Mahomes is TT’s most famous alum, not b/c of what he actually did at TT…..but…..b/c…..of…..winning……RINGS at The NFL level! This **** said u can make an argument that Jordan wasn’t even the best UNC player ever (speaking of his time at UNC), when QUITE LITERALLY Mahomes 100000% wasn’t the best TT player ever. Michael Crabtree, Graham Harrell, Kliff Klingsbury all run circles around Mahomes while at TT.

U know what they don’t run circles around at him at? The NFL. U know y? Ring Culture!

🤔🤔🤔🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Man U cannot help but be entertained by this site. Anything for a cape, I tell u.

Oh, & as far as ur Jordan take:
Donald Trump GIF by reactionseditor


Jordan’s first NBA nickname, which he debunked, was Captain Marvel. He debunked it b/c he felt it was disrespectful to Bird & Magic being a rookie.

•Bill has the rings but he don’t have the stats
•Kareem & Jordan r tied for the rings, but Kareem don’t have the records or individual accolades

There’s only one player in the Top 75 that’s:
•Undefeated as a Defending champion
•Can claim they made All NBA, All Def, Scoring Champion, MVP, Finals MVP, & All Star Game MVP in the same season
•Can claim being undefeated in ALL championship games, Collegiately, Professionally, & Internationally.
•Every Finals, he was the undisputed best player on both teams

Michael Jeffrey Jordan, The Be All & End All.
 
Why are you wasting your time with this nonsense? It's obvious some people on this board read to argue, not comprehend. UNC has been a power in college basketball for the better part of 70 years. Ring culture has ruined sports discourse, because people don't understand that there are tons of very good to elite entities that have consistently competed for titles, despite not having a billion rings. Context matters. UNC under Dean Smith was as good as there was, period. Anyone trying to argue otherwise isn't a serious person.

I was merely making a comparison between TTU and UNC, as in, TTU wasn't all that great before Mahomes, so his star power is magnified as a result. You can easily make the argument that Jordan wasn't even the best UNC player ever, their history is that **** deep, they have had so many outstanding players, players that won championships and made multiple Final Four runs. It's different when you are part of a machine, compared to being the unquestioned star.

People ignore the fact that Michael Jordan wasn't always the end all be all in regards to basketball players, there was a time when people could have legit arguments about him not being unquestioned GOAT at every level. Honestly, you can still have those arguments, as long as people like Bill Russell, and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar exist.


What a bunch of nonsense.

Dean Smith was a very good coach. Nobody disputes that.

But he had not broken through to win a championship until Michael Jordan got him there. That's also a fact.

And AFTER Michael Jordan got UNC its first Division I ring, it became much easier for Dean Smith to recruit and win championships at UNC. ALSO A FACT.

All the "what about 1956 when black players couldn't play" nonsense in the world won't change that.

It's funny that you chose to "advise" @Calinative that "some people on this board read to argue" when that is EXACTLY WHAT HE DID. He jumped into a thread to argue, not comprehend.

It is inarguable that Michael Jordan transformed UNC's basketball trajectory, yet here comes @Calinative to argue.
 
Why are you wasting your time with this nonsense? It's obvious some people on this board read to argue, not comprehend. UNC has been a power in college basketball for the better part of 70 years. Ring culture has ruined sports discourse, because people don't understand that there are tons of very good to elite entities that have consistently competed for titles, despite not having a billion rings. Context matters. UNC under Dean Smith was as good as there was, period. Anyone trying to argue otherwise isn't a serious person.

I was merely making a comparison between TTU and UNC, as in, TTU wasn't all that great before Mahomes, so his star power is magnified as a result. You can easily make the argument that Jordan wasn't even the best UNC player ever, their history is that **** deep, they have had so many outstanding players, players that won championships and made multiple Final Four runs. It's different when you are part of a machine, compared to being the unquestioned star.

People ignore the fact that Michael Jordan wasn't always the end all be all in regards to basketball players, there was a time when people could have legit arguments about him not being unquestioned GOAT at every level. Honestly, you can still have those arguments, as long as people like Bill Russell, and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar exist.


What a bunch of nonsense.

Dean Smith was a very good coach. Nobody disputes that.

But he had not broken through to win a championship until Michael Jordan got him there. That's also a fact.

And AFTER Michael Jordan got UNC its first Division I ring, it became much easier for Dean Smith to recruit and win championships at UNC. ALSO A FACT.

All the "what about 1956 when black players couldn't play" nonsense in the world won't change that.

It's funny that you chose to "advise" @Calinative that "some people on this board read to argue" when that is EXACTLY WHAT HE DID. He jumped into a thread to argue, not comprehend.

It is inarguable that Michael Jordan transformed UNC's basketball trajectory, yet here comes @Calinative to argue.
Bruh lmao
 
Back
Top