- Joined
- Jan 12, 2014
- Messages
- 67,251
Sure. That 2/3rds has a cash-value though.
Cali, you should challenge TOC to a dance-off.Your porsts are ******* beyond stupid.
Sure. That 2/3rds has a cash-value though.
Cali, you should challenge TOC to a dance-off.Your porsts are ******* beyond stupid.
Yeah right… until you go full Rerun on him.I'm sure he would beat me. He is great at dancing around the truth.
Yeah right… until you go full Rerun on him.
View attachment 365079
I knew you’d appreciate RerunLove me some Fred Berry!
Did you know that Rerun and his dance troupe, The Lockers, appeared on the THIRD EVER episode of Saturday Night Live in 1975, hosted by Rob Reiner (I have the first 5 seasons on Blu-Ray)? Plus, he's from The Lou.
Married 6 times. To 4 women. Crazy stuff.
IT’S ABOUT **** TIME
OK, so @Hufftwoseven asked my thoughts. Well, we’re in a weird situation.
Let me preface this by saying that I fully expect us to re-up w Adidas. A while ago I said based upon what I was informed, it made me feel very uneasy & stated I felt it was 75% Adidas / 25% Nike. I will now say 85% Adidas / 15% Nike just b/c I know who’s involved.
Now, here’s y I say this is a weird situation:
•Back in 2015, we signed a “monumental deal” w/ Adidas making us the “Flagship of Adidas” in The ACC.
•2 yrs later (this is important), UL’s deal trumped ours
•2 yrs later, KU’s deal trumped ours
•3 yrs later, UW’s deal trumped ours
But here’s the kicker, Texas A&M decided not to do a long term deal w Adidas; they took a 5 yr deal that expires the same exact day as us.
Here’s what’s interesting:
1. Adidas spent a ****, & I mean a **** ton of $$ to both PSU & UTenn.
2. UL, TAMU, & Miami all r expiring around the same time.
3. Allegedly, Adidas wants in on Utah now, whose contract ALSO expires at the same time as us & TAMU.
As I said yrs ago, signing the 12 yr deal was going to bite us in the *** due to being outdated & now….coming off our best season since 2002, here we r having to compete w TAMU, Adidas potential overpay for Utah, & UL.
So it’s going to be interesting.
Lastly, as I check Miami x Adidas branded merchandise via Adidas: 23
Miami x Adidas via Fanatics: 106
FSU via Nike: 97
FSU x Nike via Fanatics: 335
UF x Nike/JB via Nike: 131
UF x Nike/JB via Fanatics: 292
Then there’s this
There’s also this little habit of Adidas:
At the end of the day, what’s going to happen is going to happen, & it’s going to be interesting to see how this plays out.
Nike had us wearing this garbage for 7 years. The uniforms before that only lasted from 2004-2006. The ones before that only from 2000-2003. I didn’t understand why we kept changing uniforms so quickly and then they left us stuck with this bs for so long smh.
Cut the crap and be real for a minute.
Nike didn't force us to do that. Review the timeline. We had THREE different AD's during that time (Hocuntt, the Shermanator, and Beta Blake). That's not an excuse. It's an explanation for the fact that the Athletic Department was largely rudderless during that time. Hocuntt was busy trying to get back to his alma mater, the Texas Tech Gamblin' Raiders. The Shermanator was busy trying to get back to his alma mater, Nebraska.
And then, for the last two years of the Nike deal, Beta Blake was busy converting our equipment and uniform allotments into straight cash payments. Yes, what @Brooklyndee says about the last couple of years of the Nike deal is true, but not because Nike "didn't love Miami". It was because Beta Blake was cutting our equipment and uniforms in order to take cash payments prior to awarding the deal to adidas.
Sad, but true.
does nike do this?
Cut the crap and be real for a minute.
Nike didn't force us to do that. Review the timeline. We had THREE different AD's during that time (Hocuntt, the Shermanator, and Beta Blake). That's not an excuse. It's an explanation for the fact that the Athletic Department was largely rudderless during that time. Hocuntt was busy trying to get back to his alma mater, the Texas Tech Gamblin' Raiders. The Shermanator was busy trying to get back to his alma mater, Nebraska.
And then, for the last two years of the Nike deal, Beta Blake was busy converting our equipment and uniform allotments into straight cash payments. Yes, what @Brooklyndee says about the last couple of years of the Nike deal is true, but not because Nike "didn't love Miami". It was because Beta Blake was cutting our equipment and uniforms in order to take cash payments prior to awarding the deal to adidas.
Sad, but true.
Thanks for the details bc I was young during that time and had no idea of the politics and issues surrounding Miami and its athletic department. **** I didn’t really become a Cane fan until the 2002 season bc of McGahee, Winslow, Taylor and Rolle. But I just knew I hated those uniforms it made Miami look like a hand me down school.
does nike do this?
They did the blue ribbon deal with LSU recently.. Trey Dez and Dj Pickett were featured athletes in that but obviously already on roster..
I dont think they will, Nike had us looking like clowns compared to other schools unfortunately..They talked about the new Nike deal with LSU a lot locally. With that said, from my fan perspective, if Nike would offer a similar deal as the LSU deal to Miami, I would be in favor of going with Nike. But, if not, and the players feel the Adidas apparel and footwear is adequate I'm fine with staying with Adidas.
I dont think they will, Nike had us looking like clowns compared to other schools unfortunately..
What Ahmmon said on the pod today about Adidas footwear was interesting. He said he thinks Adidas cleats are the reason he started getting hamstring injuries, and he is interested in seeing Nike school v. Adidas school injury reports. It's a great listen.They talked about the new Nike deal with LSU a lot locally. With that said, from my fan perspective, if Nike would offer a similar deal as the LSU deal to Miami, I would be in favor of going with Nike. But, if not, and the players feel the Adidas apparel and footwear is adequate I'm fine with staying with Adidas.