There's a good example above in the sequence
@skyman described. Between the wonky approach to stepping on the gas (pace) and slowing down, the general desire to stay on schedule seemingly at a bad cost/benefit with riskier plays, and the fact we end up in predictable tendencies that empower lesser teams, I think we unnecessarily punch beneath our actual weight. Sure, there are times where it makes sense, and there are many times it's just bad math. If the defense is as good as you think it is (I think it's solid, but have to see more from our LBs in coverage to be sure), then you should be empowered to take even more necessary risk on offense.