forums

Official Michael Irvin* Sues Marriott for $100 Million

PIPO said:
@ben

One of the Maudes is trying to put me out of business:

pulp fiction GIF
Click to expand...
One?
 
Advertisement
Cryptical Envelopment said:
The NFL would have certainly signed a contract for a block of rooms as a "group" through the "group sales" department of the hotel in advance of the announcement of the SB being assigned to Arizona, as agreed to with the city and local hotels as part of the conditions of granting the SB to Phoenix, controlled the rooms, and then assigned each room individually to their group members. As Irvin was a guest in the "group," in the event of an issue, especially an HR issue like an employee lodging a complaint against a member of the group, the primary group contact and yes, payer, would certainly be contacted, without any harm or violation of Irvin's privacy, as agreed to in the terms and conditions all parties accepted when the sales contract was signed.
Click to expand...
Makes sense. Obviously I don’t know what was alleged specifically and what was known by who and with what evidence. With that said, I’d guess it’s even possible that Marriott complied with what they were supposed to and the NFL Network took an action that may turn out to be an overreaction pending what is learned. Again, I have no idea what happened. Whatever transpired does have limits though.

It seems that it was about 90 seconds in a public place with no physical contact. It has to be limited to an allegation of some kind of verbal harassment of sorts and so what did he say and what was the lady’s response and then his follow up???

Anyhow, I am curious to learn what the witnesses say so that the full story and context comes to light. I’ve seen accusers be correct and I’ve seen accusers lie.
 
Advertisement
JeddTheFisch said:
I owned Oxman's Torts class. Pretty good for a 2.9 guy who was twice academically probated.
Click to expand...
i booked Oxman´s Tort class. i was in shape, handsome and funny. and i wrote my name at the front of each blue book. i didn´t do the anonymity thing when taking tests. i WANTED the professor to know who i was, for good and bad. it worked for the three times i took Hausler (he told me i was a glutton for punishment. i felt outed. how did he know?) in constitutional crim procedure i had to walk with a can of mace because i wasn't agreeing with certain "legal" views, the professor hated me and some of the students probably wanted to jump me. still wanted that spineless f@g to know my name.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Back
Top