- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
- Messages
- 7,442
...after 2 games 
Well they were efficient in getting their butts whooped and then running a glorified HS team into the turf…so yea based on that number 2 sounds about right…lol at bama at number 2
people like Manny Diaz love analytics. football guys like saban, Kirby, Mario, probably Lanning, dont care as much.Analytics have value, but college football is about conventional wisdom. Alabama dominated for two decades of the “modern” era with a classic formula.
Veteran, smart QB. Elite offensive line. Power running game. Dudes on DL. Long, man-coverage corners who tackle. Win the turnover battle.
That’s our identity through two games and it is more proven than goofy algorithms.
If I said what I felt you would ban me.
They’re just making up measurements to make the SEC look good at this pointlol at bama at number 2
Always have been.They’re just making up measurements to make the SEC look good at this point
This metric, as ESPN's FPI, matter to CFPO Selection Committee.The only rankings that matter to me are win/loss column followed by point differential. Fight me