This is pathetic. They don't have a single guy on that roster that we recruited or would have signed. Let that sink in.
Is their coaching that much better than ours where the game is virtually a toss up when they don't have a single player we wanted to sign? I hope not. We should fck these bytches really hard.
I think I saw that they have 1 or 2 guys in PFFs top 100
I'm not talking about now. You don't recruit guys after they've been on a college team for several years. We didn't recruit anyone on that team. Therefore, we should hammer them. It's pretty simple. Jimmys and Joes.
Or do you worriers think Satterfield is some hidden genius HC and better than Rick?
Which is it? Do they have better players than us or better coaches? Or both?
This is pathetic. They don't have a single guy on that roster that we recruited or would have signed. Let that sink in.
Is their coaching that much better than ours where the game is virtually a toss up when they don't have a single player we wanted to sign? I hope not. We should fck these bytches really hard.
I think I saw that they have 1 or 2 guys in PFFs top 100
I'm not talking about now. You don't recruit guys after they've been on a college team for several years. We didn't recruit anyone on that team. Therefore, we should hammer them. It's pretty simple. Jimmys and Joes.
Or do you worriers think Satterfield is some hidden genius HC and better than Rick?
Which is it? Do they have better players than us or better coaches? Or both?
Saying we should smash somebody because we didn't recruit any of their players is absolutely stupid. It's not like this is a team from Florida. Also what does it matter how good they were as recruits?
They're not going to beat us, but you're making it seem like they have no one that could play on our team, which isn't true, mainly because their OL is their strongest position group, and one we aren't exactly great at.
Dear Blake James,
This is why you don't schedule these games. Win, you're suppose to win. Lose, it's the "biggest upset" of the year. We gain nothing from playing this game.
Sincerely,
Common Sense
This is pathetic. They don't have a single guy on that roster that we recruited or would have signed. Let that sink in.
Is their coaching that much better than ours where the game is virtually a toss up when they don't have a single player we wanted to sign? I hope not. We should fck these bytches really hard.
I think I saw that they have 1 or 2 guys in PFFs top 100
I'm not talking about now. You don't recruit guys after they've been on a college team for several years. We didn't recruit anyone on that team. Therefore, we should hammer them. It's pretty simple. Jimmys and Joes.
Or do you worriers think Satterfield is some hidden genius HC and better than Rick?
Which is it? Do they have better players than us or better coaches? Or both?
Saying we should smash somebody because we didn't recruit any of their players is absolutely stupid. It's not like this is a team from Florida. Also what does it matter how good they were as recruits?
They're not going to beat us, but you're making it seem like they have no one that could play on our team, which isn't true, mainly because their OL is their strongest position group, and one we aren't exactly great at.
No. What's absolutely stupid is your weak brain that processes information from a position of fear. Anyone who thinks a team full of 2 stars should beat a team that recruits a top 20 class every year is an idiot.
This is ultimately a players' game, and we have a massive advantage there. On top of that, we have the better staff. So where's the advantage that makes a sissy's lip quiver? A 23k seat stadium?
This is pathetic. They don't have a single guy on that roster that we recruited or would have signed. Let that sink in.
Is their coaching that much better than ours where the game is virtually a toss up when they don't have a single player we wanted to sign? I hope not. We should fck these bytches really hard.
I think I saw that they have 1 or 2 guys in PFFs top 100
I'm not talking about now. You don't recruit guys after they've been on a college team for several years. We didn't recruit anyone on that team. Therefore, we should hammer them. It's pretty simple. Jimmys and Joes.
Or do you worriers think Satterfield is some hidden genius HC and better than Rick?
Which is it? Do they have better players than us or better coaches? Or both?
Saying we should smash somebody because we didn't recruit any of their players is absolutely stupid. It's not like this is a team from Florida. Also what does it matter how good they were as recruits?
They're not going to beat us, but you're making it seem like they have no one that could play on our team, which isn't true, mainly because their OL is their strongest position group, and one we aren't exactly great at.
This is pathetic. They don't have a single guy on that roster that we recruited or would have signed. Let that sink in.
Is their coaching that much better than ours where the game is virtually a toss up when they don't have a single player we wanted to sign? I hope not. We should fck these bytches really hard.
I think I saw that they have 1 or 2 guys in PFFs top 100
I'm not talking about now. You don't recruit guys after they've been on a college team for several years. We didn't recruit anyone on that team. Therefore, we should hammer them. It's pretty simple. Jimmys and Joes.
Or do you worriers think Satterfield is some hidden genius HC and better than Rick?
Which is it? Do they have better players than us or better coaches? Or both?
Saying we should smash somebody because we didn't recruit any of their players is absolutely stupid. It's not like this is a team from Florida. Also what does it matter how good they were as recruits?
They're not going to beat us, but you're making it seem like they have no one that could play on our team, which isn't true, mainly because their OL is their strongest position group, and one we aren't exactly great at.
Assuming it's true that their strongest position group is OL, the actual analysis is how it will do against our strongest position group, which is our DL based on performance year-to-date. As for our OL, we should be able to run successfully against App. State, which will make it easier to run our play action. We'll be fine.
82% of public bets are on Miami's side and the line still moved in App St. favor from -4.5 to -3.5.
We should win this by 20+.
Seriously, no one would be worried or know who Appalachian State was if they didn't upset Michigan in 2007. A Michigan team quarterbacked by wunderkind Chad Henne and coached by the Larry Coker...er...Lloyd Carr (Admittedly, not much difference between the two).
We're worried about a Sun Belt team? This is what Miami football has rapidly deformed to? I know the Golden years were rough, but shytting our collective pants about a team from the Sun Belt???
We should win this by 20+.
Seriously, no one would be worried or know who Appalachian State was if they didn't upset Michigan in 2007. A Michigan team quarterbacked by wunderkind Chad Henne and coached by the Larry Coker...er...Lloyd Carr (Admittedly, not much difference between the two).
We're worried about a Sun Belt team? This is what Miami football has rapidly deformed to? I know the Golden years were rough, but shytting our collective pants about a team from the Sun Belt???
The Belt is ranked higher than the C-USA right now. If you knew anything about the entirety of CFB and not just the newly coined term Power 5 (an ESPN creation no less), you'd know that the talent gap didn't suddenly just appear out of no where. This is one division, FBS, and you are visiting a place that will likely be louder than everywhere you play except Virginia Tech and UNC. A natural amphitheater keeps sound in quite nicely.
Should win by 20+, but playing an option team, in the rain, isn't an ideal situation for Miami.
We should win this by 20+.
Seriously, no one would be worried or know who Appalachian State was if they didn't upset Michigan in 2007. A Michigan team quarterbacked by wunderkind Chad Henne and coached by the Larry Coker...er...Lloyd Carr (Admittedly, not much difference between the two).
We're worried about a Sun Belt team? This is what Miami football has rapidly deformed to? I know the Golden years were rough, but shytting our collective pants about a team from the Sun Belt???
The Belt is ranked higher than the C-USA right now. If you knew anything about the entirety of CFB and not just the newly coined term Power 5 (an ESPN creation no less), you'd know that the talent gap didn't suddenly just appear out of no where. This is one division, FBS, and you are visiting a place that will likely be louder than everywhere you play except Virginia Tech and UNC. A natural amphitheater keeps sound in quite nicely.
Should win by 20+, but playing an option team, in the rain, isn't an ideal situation for Miami.
And to get the intended goal, you would want the most realistic looking line to get a 50/50 split, no? They may not be trying to pick an exact outcome, but that becomes an unintended consequence.
You have a desired result (50/50 money split) which may lead to a certain outcome.
It isn't a guaranteed result. The spread follows the money, not the outcome. Things change (injuries, suspensions, weather etc.) and as a result people change their decisions.
Also, if the spread changes (which it goes up and/or down or stays the same), when do we judge? At the end of the week right before the game? At that point, the spread has been set and then shifted for awhile and the only thing Vegas is doing is trying to even the money. Once they set it (by the experts in Vegas) all their doing is balancing the money.
My point is that the outcome of the game and the spread (should they match or not) is a random occurrence and not the intended purpose.
Side note: Not sure what is considered close either. If the goal (like you said) was to hit the outcome and you don't hit, is it close? If the favorite is favored by 2 and loses by 1, is that close? Sure it is 3 points but the underdog won.
The line is now down to -3
We should win this by 20+.
Seriously, no one would be worried or know who Appalachian State was if they didn't upset Michigan in 2007. A Michigan team quarterbacked by wunderkind Chad Henne and coached by the Larry Coker...er...Lloyd Carr (Admittedly, not much difference between the two).
We're worried about a Sun Belt team? This is what Miami football has rapidly deformed to? I know the Golden years were rough, but shytting our collective pants about a team from the Sun Belt???
The Belt is ranked higher than the C-USA right now. If you knew anything about the entirety of CFB and not just the newly coined term Power 5 (an ESPN creation no less), you'd know that the talent gap didn't suddenly just appear out of no where. This is one division, FBS, and you are visiting a place that will likely be louder than everywhere you play except Virginia Tech and UNC. A natural amphitheater keeps sound in quite nicely.
Should win by 20+, but playing an option team, in the rain, isn't an ideal situation for Miami.