ThisWe beat Duke & VT next 2 weeks get to the ACX championship and win get Mali back and go on a run
ThisWe beat Duke & VT next 2 weeks get to the ACX championship and win get Mali back and go on a run
Agreed. Made some plays in the second half, but struggled under pressure in the opening half. Just not sure he’s the guy you hand keys to franchise. Not sure Carr is either.And not a criticism of Mensah, but if I’m an NFL team I’m not sure he’s my franchise player
He’s accurate, but if the play is not on schedule he can’t make that up with physical traits and his arm is very average at best
Look I’m thankful he’s here and it sound be great if he came back but the NFL trusts are not high level for a QB
This isn’t your prototype player
View attachment 379539
View attachment 379540
He does not drop it while taking the 3rd step. Still has possession.
Still shots do nothing except expose the poster. He's juggling it there.
I've watched this call made repeatedly. As in a player gets 2 feet in, just like this one, and hits the ground and drops the ball after, but possession was established with the 2 feet down and control first.Sadly, shouldn’t be a TD anywhere. Previous play with Upshaw could have been PI. Mensah call probably wasn’t target, but backside defender appeared to have a hand inside his collar as he was going down.
View attachment 379542
View attachment 379543
Still shots are literally how half the calls in football are made via replay. That’s firm possession, 2 feet down, steps out of bounds with possession. Nowhere does it say you have to tuck the ball away for it to be a catch.
Or LSUCould be worse. We could be ole Miss fans
I do know. You have to complete the catch whether it's when you fall to the ground or take another step. This is only a controversy to Miami fans who don't watch football
Lol. Everyone keeps saying you have to complete the catch, but nobody can define what that means in the context of being in the end zone. He had control of the ball with one foot down, then a second foot. Wouldn’t that count as a step? What if he lands on both feet but never takes another step. Can the DB come up and knock the ball out 10 seconds later? If not, where’s the cutoff? 3 seconds! 2?You have to complete the catch all the way. It got knocked out in the continuation of the play.
Would you think it was a catch if it was a Notre Dame player? Be honest with yourself.
Unfortunately, didn’t bring it into his chest & maintain possession long enough.I've watched this call made repeatedly. As in a player gets 2 feet in, just like this one, and hits the ground and drops the ball after, but possession was established with the 2 feet down and control first.
You have valid points. The more I watch the play, the more confused I get.Lol. Everyone keeps saying you have to complete the catch, but nobody can define what that means in the context of being in the end zone. He had control of the ball with one foot down, then a second foot. Wouldn’t that count as a step? What if he lands on both feet but never takes another step. Can the DB come up and knock the ball out 10 seconds later? If not, where’s the cutoff? 3 seconds! 2?
For how long?Think the other way
He catches right on goal line and same happens
Has to keep control
Everyone is saying make a football move bc they’ve heard it on TV. There’s no football move to be made when you catch it in the end zone. Pure judgement call from the refs as to what constitutes a completed catch on that. Call just didn’t go our way.I do know. You have to complete the catch whether it's when you fall to the ground or take another step. This is only a controversy to Miami fans who don't watch football
Lol. Everyone keeps saying you have to complete the catch, but nobody can define what that means in the context of being in the end zone. He had control of the ball with one foot down, then a second foot. Wouldn’t that count as a step? What if he lands on both feet but never takes another step. Can the DB come up and knock the ball out 10 seconds later? If not, where’s the cutoff? 3 seconds! 2?You have to complete the catch all the way. It got knocked out in the continuation of the play.
Would you think it was a catch if it was a Notre Dame player? Be honest with yourself.
I’ve seen people catch the ball holding it high in the air away from the DB and never bring it into their body as they get a foot down and then step out of bounds. He didn’t go to the ground, and he’s in the end zone, so there’s no need for a football move. I’d just like to know how the actual rule defines a catch in the end zone that doesn’t go to the ground.Unfortunately, didn’t bring it into his chest & maintain possession long enough.
Are you blind? He caught the ball and landed with 2 feet, then took a step out of bounds.It wasn't three steps. You're really reaching now. We lost. We will bounce back.
Since when is that a requirement? I guess OBJ 1 hander isn't a catch either. That's never been a thing.Unfortunately, didn’t bring it into his chest & maintain possession long enough.