Should have said 'if'Do you have a link? all I could find said 3:30 ESPN
Should have said 'if'Do you have a link? all I could find said 3:30 ESPN
Up to -6.5 at a lot of places now.
Remember 2014 when we ran the ball 95% of the time and blew them out?
Could we see some I-formation on Saturday?
Are you joking? Moving that fast in that direction means they want you to take VT. No wonder Awsi gets so frustrated watching you people try to talk about sports betting.
If I were a betting man, I’d say we lose by 17.
Where's Assy Booger with a long winded sonnet involving permutations and combinatory theory?
That was 2015. Richt wasn't here yet.Remember a couple years ago when UNC was historically bad against the run. Rickety couldn’t budge them with our run game. Then they gave up 600 yards rushing to Baylor with Baylor forced to play a WR at QB because their top 3 QBs were unavailable.
With Rickety’s run schemes we are never going to just line up and ramrod the run game. We are going to need to be competent in the throw game.
LMAOIf I were a betting man, I’d say we lose by 17.
Let me get this straight:
We are expected to not just win on the road in cold weather against a team most thought would be our main competition for the Coastal, but we have to do so by at least 4 points to cover. And we've got in-fighting and are in the midst of a pathetic four game losing streak.
Right.
The "Armani suit wise guys" you reference drove the line against GT from Miami +3.5 to PK. So, just like you, they don't know ****.
I didn't bet the game, but the massive line movement was indicative what the right side was. I'd never bet the opposite side of a 3.5 point move.Good call.