If so that's likely not how they'd been trained - or at least supposed to have been. FEDS paid big bucks after Columbine to train LEO on active shooter situations. Directives were engage - alone if necessary - and neutralize the threat.
Please expound...
Yeah that's not quite what I'm saying. But even beyond that - letting a daughter grow up without a father might be even more of a travesty.
Street violence occurs less when there is an active and strong police presence so no, they can't stop an in progress drive by, but the likelihood of one happening in the first place decreases. This isn't rocket science.
I do wonder if there were issues between local and federal officials at the scene. It wouldn't be the first time. I hope that an agency ****ing match didn't get in the way of a forceful and quick response.
they all like to cosplay like they are badasses, but this is the only one amongst them
What is rocket science is why cops let crimes happen, when they are present and able to intervene, I guess.
www.statista.com
www.statista.com
www.statista.com
blackdemographics.com
If true that is a bad emmeffer . Training, equipment and experience mean nothing if you're to afraid to act.
CA, followed by FL and TX. Coincidentally the top 3 for population too. NY is a little further down.
www.statista.com
Yes, but that doesn't mean blacks are poor because they are not getting married. It could also(and IMO the more likely reason) mean they are not getting married because they are poor. When you are poor you are way more likely to have unprotected *** and have kids early. Just look at your average poor school. You will see countless kids having babies. In the more wealthy schools, if a teen has a kid its a big deal since its so rare. That is the point I am making. Of course married blacks are going to be wealthier as a whole since they are more likely to come from wealthier backgrounds. Of course single parents are going to be poor on a whole because they come from poorer backgrounds.There are certainly more factors facing blacks, no doubt but the numbers simply do not show those factors are as large of an impact as single parent households.
The poverty rate for all Married couples in the US is 4.7%
The poverty rate for Black Married couples is 6.2%
The poverty rate for Blacks in the US is 19.5%
That means as of 2020 blacks households are about 3.15 times less likely to be in poverty when housed by a married couple.
52% of whites are married and 30% of blacks are married. White households are married 76% more than black households.
Family structure in the US is now the single largest indicator of poverty in the US. Race is another but it not even in the same ball park as being from a single parent family. There is still a lot of work ahead of us but discounting the value of the family structure isn't going to help. This was not the case 30 years ago.
Poverty rate married-couple families U.S. 2022 | Statista
In 2022, around five percent of married-couple families in the United States lived below the national poverty level.Poverty rate Black married-couple families U.S. 2022 | Statista
In 2022, 5.6 percent of Black married-couple families were living below the poverty line in the United States.Poverty rate by race and ethnicity U.S. 2022 | Statista
In 2022, 17.1 percent of Black people living in the United States were living below the poverty line, compared to 8.6 percent of white people.BLACK MARRIAGE - BlackDemographics.com
Black Marriage in America | Statistics: 30% of African Americans were married compared to 48% of all Americans. Half or 50% have never been
Apologies . I should read better. Please disregard my other replies if you have seen them.
Don't be so modest.
Dude. I'm sitting in an auditorium 3 hours ago - my daughter is singing her first solo in a chorus ensemble. Half the time I'm staring at the exits wondering how sht would play out if an incel came through those doors; I have my spyderco - but left my g19 at home because I'm stupid/good little citizen.