forums

Off-Topic Mass killings

OriginalGatorHater said:
he is not 100% correct and your data proves it. 55% of the single parent mothers were not college educated. AKA most likely poorer. So it all comes back to poverty.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, the 55% are continuing the cycle of poverty by having kids out of wedlock.
 
Advertisement
OriginalGatorHater said:
100%. The columbine kids had the perfect sitcom parents and look what they did. No one was saying "the 2 parent household caused that". The kid was obviously a depressed loser and was crazy.
Click to expand...
So, at 18, was able to spend megabucks in a short period of days buying 2 ARs and a ton of ammo without raising an eyebrow at the gun shop. Just going hunting for armadillos or whatever I guess.
 
JD08 said:
The women's revolution coincided with economic changes that necessitated a two income family to enjoy a standard of living previously enjoyed by a household with a breadwinner. See the end of Bretton-Woods for more details.
Click to expand...

Yeah but why does that impact family structure? You would think that would have the opposite affect. It also affected different groups of women differently.
 
Advertisement
OriginalGatorHater said:
Its not even just that, but just getting stopped for looking like a drug dealer, could end up with you getting charged with "resisting arrest" or similar. Plenty of people get convicted of resisting with no other charges filed. You don't even actually have to resist to be charged either, since unless someone is filming or they have their bodycam on. Its your word vs theirs.
Click to expand...
I think you are taking "looking like a drug dealer" to explain what is called reasonable suspicion. If you are in a designated high crime area, out just hanging around at 230am, and a police officer drives by and you make movements that can be interpreted as hiding something or acting "suspiciously," then an officer has a legal right to detain you (this does not mean in handcuffs, it means to tell you you cannot leave without identifying yourself, and explaining why you are there and what you are doing.) This also means that you can be frisked for weapons in the interest of the officer's safety and yours. If you have nothing to hide and are just out for a stroll or whatever, comply with the officer and you'll be on your way. It's simple.
 
NC_Canes_11 said:
Doesn’t help anything during and if you think defunding police for social workers is smart, you’re part of the problem.
Click to expand...
I think defunding the police for social workers is a great idea. Especially in poorer communities. If you don't agree then you should stay tf out of our communities. Your all about state and local rights, when it comes to things that fit your agenda. But when we want to keep our towns safe from oppression that is where you draw the line.
 
Advertisement
clg003 said:
I was actually referring to his point that there is tons a research in this area...

College Degree by family Structure. 75% two parent households, 25% one parent household.

The point is family structure determines poverty. It also determines education. Poverty doesn't make people avoid marriage.
Click to expand...
That point is not correct though. Your stats clearly show that poverty makes people avoid marriage since the majority of unmarried people are poor. They aren't becoming poor after they had a child. They are poor, according to your stat, when they have a child.
 
OriginalGatorHater said:
That point is not correct though. Your stats clearly show that poverty makes people avoid marriage since the majority of unmarried people are poor. They aren't becoming poor after they had a child. They are poor, according to your stat, when they have a child.
Click to expand...
How does poverty "make people avoid marriage"?
 
Where are we on this early quote from Lt. Chris Olivarez of DPS???

"Police officers rushed into the school to get their own children out of the school"

Probably going to need to change that one, Chris.
 
OriginalGatorHater said:
I think defunding the police for social workers is a great idea. Especially in poorer communities. If you don't agree then you should stay tf out of our communities. Your all about state and local rights, when it comes to things that fit your agenda. But when we want to keep our towns safe from oppression that is where you draw the line.
Click to expand...
You're in the minority of your minority. While many black do feel your sentiment about their interatcions with the police, they still want the police there.

news.gallup.com

Black Americans Want Police to Retain Local Presence

It's not so much the volume of interactions Black Americans have with the police that troubles them or differentiates them from other racial groups, but rather the quality of those interactions.
news.gallup.com news.gallup.com
 
Advertisement
OriginalCanesCanesCanes said:
Clearly that would mean he was having a more or less normal adolescent experience. Even if he only had a fraction of that. Certainly not all loners end up being mass murdering shooters, but there is one thing that is starting to become clear about all these guys, is that they really don’t interact a whole lot with human beings at least from what I see, they sure spend a lot of time in chat rooms and online and that crap.

I mean honestly I would never do anything like this but I might go half crazy if that’s all I did, I crave being around people I love being around other people and talking shlt - I’ll talk to anybody. The other day I just started a conversation with a pilot at the airport and you just learn so much from talking to strangers, by the way this guy was flying from MIA to Delhi. We talked for about 15 minutes almost made him late.

Point is these loners don’t have any social skills they don’t know how to function in society, and a tiny tiny percentage of them act out in a just bizarre way .
Click to expand...
I 1000000% agree with you. Literally every single thing you said. The guys that live in their moms basement are the types to look out for. They have no friends and get no puzzy. And even if they claim " this is how I enjoy my life" its not the case. They may think that because its all they know, but they would enjoy it way more if they actually did things humans were designed to enjoy. Such as *** or interacting with others.

I would never shoot up a school either, but I would be depressed af if all I did was stay by myself all day and only interaction I got was in chat rooms and *********ing.

I am the same as you. I chat with everybody. I also can take a hint too. I am not the annoying chatterbox that bothers the guy next to me in line. But I will start a convo up with a guy in the line and if he takes to it, we chat. And like you said I learn a lot that way. It also helps with women, because if I see a hot girl. I ask for her number. Not in a creep construction worker way, but just in a nice normal way and don't linger around or press the issue if she says no(which more often than not is because she is married or has a BF-or at least claims to lol). I wouldn't have it any other way, since a good chunk of the girls I get are girls I met on the street.
 
WanderFranco said:
How does poverty "make people avoid marriage"?
Click to expand...
I have no idea, but that is what his stat is saying. Maybe because they don't want to pay for the wedding. Maybe because they are less educated so they use less contraceptives. Maybe because they have nothing to spend their time enjoying besides ***. IDK.
 
Advertisement
OriginalGatorHater said:
I have no idea, but that is what his stat is saying. Maybe because they don't want to pay for the wedding. Maybe because they are less educated so they use less contraceptives. Maybe because they have nothing to spend their time enjoying besides ***. IDK.
Click to expand...
I think you're assuming causation that doesn't actually exist. The poverty doesn't "cause" the resistance to marriage.
 
JD08 said:
Have you heard about our war on drugs?
Click to expand...
that one is a massive success from a government perspective. They bootstrapped a stazi style spy state that gutted the 4th amendment onto an asset seizure regime that smoked the “takings clause.” Big win for the government.

Oh you meant boondoggle for the plebs? Oh yeah it’s been bad for them.
 
Caneinator said:
I think you are taking "looking like a drug dealer" to explain what is called reasonable suspicion. If you are in a designated high crime area, out just hanging around at 230am, and a police officer drives by and you make movements that can be interpreted as hiding something or acting "suspiciously," then an officer has a legal right to detain you (this does not mean in handcuffs, it means to tell you you cannot leave without identifying yourself, and explaining why you are there and what you are doing.) This also means that you can be frisked for weapons in the interest of the officer's safety and yours. If you have nothing to hide and are just out for a stroll or whatever, comply with the officer and you'll be on your way. It's simple.
Click to expand...
You are wrong. Number one in NY that was not the case you can stop anyone you want for any reason. and it turned into . You are black and we are bored so we will search you. Second, even by your definition its your word against mine. I can be walking down the street and you could say "he reached in his pocket or he did such and such motion" when in reality its just because I was black and you wanted to search me.

You even said it yourself. being in a high crime area at 2:30 am hanging around is suspicious? Its my **** neighborhood and its a free country. I shouldn't have to deal with armed men forcing me put my hands up in the air, because I want to stand in front of my house late at night. Maybe I work the night shift and I just got home from work(which was the case numerous times for me since I worked after school).

As far as just comply and you will be on your way. That is *********. I learned not to talk to you guys besides saying my name and that is it. I do what I am told. I keep my mouth shut and that ends up ****ing a lot of you guys off. Not to mention if I was upset, because I was coming home from work late at night and I started getting harassed and I cursed you out(Which I have never done, but its a reasonable action) I should not get cracked with a baton or whatnot for using words. You should act like adults and ignore it. If you are such a scardy cat that you are terrified of a blackman with his hands in his pocket that you will shoot him because of him making a quick movement. You shouldn't have become a cop.

As far as your study you posted before. That is just a small group who were willing to talk to interviewers. It is in no way a comprehensive study that proves blacks love the cops.

Lucky for us, most states are forcing you guys to wear bodycams, so future generations won't have to deal with it as much.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top