MaRiO NeEds his OwN GuYs

Advertisement
His "argument" is that blue-chip ratio means everything, yet his own chart shows that, outside the top 3, blue chip ratio literally means nothing.

It can be both. The blue chip ratio absolutely matters. Not even Saban is winning a title with a roster of three stars.

However, you need the ratio and at least good to great coaching and you have the formula for a 'ship.

Meeting the ratio with ****** coaching, you're right, doesn't mean a whole lot.
 
It can be both. The blue chip ratio absolutely matters. Not even Saban is winning a title with a roster of three stars.

However, you need the ratio and at least good to great coaching and you have the formula for a 'ship.

Meeting the ratio with ****** coaching, you're right, doesn't mean a whole lot.
Blue chip ratio doesn’t take into account mental toughness. I see a team that panics when things don’t go their way.
 
On CIS you need popcorn ready in hand 24/7

B4EE58D2-8725-4DB2-AE0B-28BB44C97B47.jpeg
 
It can be both. The blue chip ratio absolutely matters. Not even Saban is winning a title with a roster of three stars.

However, you need the ratio and at least good to great coaching and you have the formula for a 'ship.

Meeting the ratio with ****** coaching, you're right, doesn't mean a whole lot.

"Blue chip ratio" doesn't matter when half of the blue chips you signed are no longer there or are too inexperienced to contribute right away. Looking at "blue chip ratio" with no context is a pretty basic mistake.
 
Advertisement
"Blue chip ratio" doesn't matter when half of the blue chips you signed are no longer there or are too inexperienced to contribute right away. Looking at "blue chip ratio" with no context is a pretty basic mistake.

I don't disagree. But it absolutely does matter. Nobody wins a title without reaching it, but there are other contributing factors to success.
 
I don't disagree. But it absolutely does matter. Nobody wins a title without reaching it, but there are other contributing factors to success.
Correct. That's why it's not intelligent to post someone's "Blue Chip Ratio" chart and say that we should be better just because of that number.
 
So you dont believe facts to be truth?


You think wake forest is more talented than miami?


They are way better coached and prepared.

lol

clawson has redshirted his entire freshman class for like 7 years straight, solely to try and take advantage of playing with 22-23 yr olds that have been in his scheme for 5 years

and you think that approach would work with this fanbase and our recruiting pool, lol you sure are a dummy
 
lol

clawson has redshirted his entire freshman class for like 7 years straight, solely to try and take advantage of playing with 22-23 yr olds that have been in his scheme for 5 years

and you think that approach would work with this fanbase and our recruiting pool, lol you sure are a dummy

Umm you have to redshirt 2star recruits.


Lmao you dont understand talent difference between who wake recruits and miami recruits.
 
Advertisement
"Blue chip ratio" doesn't matter when half of the blue chips you signed are no longer there or are too inexperienced to contribute right away. Looking at "blue chip ratio" with no context is a pretty basic mistake.


You think the blue chip ratio is factoring in guys who are no longer with the program????



This fantasy world you live in must be awesome.



Making excuses for bad coaching when there is enough talent to win the coastal. Dont worry i did that under golden. I just learned from my mistakes.
 
Lmao you dont understand talent difference between who wake recruits and miami recruits.

Could you quantify that for us in something other than "stars"? For example, what is it about our offensive line that makes them "better" than theirs, considering our offensive linemen can't make a push for a yard.
 
Back
Top